Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 31;12:13567–13578. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S283656

Table 3.

Comparison of CEUS and DCE-MRI Features Among Benign and Malignant in Mass-Like Breast Lesions

Variables Benign n (%) Malignant n (%) P
CEUS <0.001
 Shape
  Regular 76 (59.4) 5 (6.9)
  Irregular 52 (40.6) 67 (93.1)
 Margin <0.001
  Distinct 98 (76.6) 7 (9.7)
  Indistinct 30 (23.4) 65 (90.3)
 Orientation 0.004
  Parallel (height to width ratio <1) 112 (87.5) 36 (50.0)
  Not parallel (height to width ratio ≥1) 16 (12.5) 36 (50.0)
 Posterior echoes <0.001
  None 91 (71.1) 48 (66.7)
  Decreased posterior echoes 0 (0.0) 18 (25.0)
  Increased posterior echoes 37 (28.9) 6 (8.3)
 Enhancement
  Enhancement pattern 0.003
  Homogeneous 99 (77.3) 31 (43.1)
  Heterogeneous 29 (22.7) 41 (56.9)
 Enhancement degree <0.001
  Hyperenhancement 69 (53.9) 61 (84.7)
  Isoenhancement 21 (16.4) 4 (5.6)
  Hypoenhancement 38 (29.7) 72 (9.7)
 DCE-MRI
 Enhance pattern 0.005
  Homogeneous 87 (68.0) 33 (45.8)
  Heterogeneous 41 (32.0) 39 (54.2)
 TIC curve <0.001
  Persistent 87 (68.0) 9 (12.5)
  Plateau 26 (20.3) 38 (52.8)
  Washout 15 (11.7) 25 (34.7)
ADC value (10−3mm2/s) 1.4 ± 0.16 0.9 ± 0.24 0.002