Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2020 Dec 1;12(12):e11836. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11836

Events Due to Snowblower Use Seen in US Emergency Departments From 2003 Through 2018

Randall T Loder 1,, Dhruv Solanki 2
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC7781562  PMID: 33409076

Abstract

Objective

To comprehensively analyze emergency department (ED) visits associated with snowblower use in the United States.

Methods

Data on National Electronic Injury Surveillance System ED visits due to snow blowers from 2003 through 2018 were analyzed by age, sex, diagnosis, anatomic location of the injury, and year, month, or weekday. The mechanism of injury and alcohol use were noted. Statistical analyses were performed, accounting for the weighted, stratified nature of the data.

Results

There were an estimated 91,451 patients with an average age of 51 years; 91.2% were male. Amputation, fracture, or laceration accounted for 43,524 (47.6%) of the ED visits. The mechanism of injury was placing the hand into the chute (44.5%), a fall/slip (13.3%), medical events (6.1%), and miscellaneous (33.8%). Most (68.9%) occurred at home. Alcohol was rarely involved (0.4%). There were 648 deaths; 647 were due to cardiac events. The five major injury diagnoses were fracture (25.9%), laceration (20.2%), strain/sprain (15.0%), amputation (11.2%), and contusion/abrasion (10.2%); 99.8% of the amputations involved fingers. The incidence of ED snowblower visits was 1.845 per 100,000 US population with no change over time. There was a general correlation between the number of visits and the annual snow cover.

Conclusions

Ample opportunity for injury prevention exists, as there was no change in the incidence over time. Cardiac events accounted for essentially all of the deaths.

Keywords: amputation, fracture, cardiac, medical, snowcover, snowblower

Introduction

Power snow blowers allow for easier, quicker snow removal at homes and businesses. However, they are potentially dangerous and can result in significant injury. Most studies of snowblower injuries discuss those sustained when placing the hand into the chute, resulting in lacerations, fractures, and, frequently, amputations [1-13]. However, other injuries can also occur such as being hit by a missile ejected from the chute, slipping/falling while using the snow blower, and medical issues such as shortness of breath and cardiac events (myocardial infarction/cardiac arrest). Cardiac events have been associated with snow shoveling [14-21] with four case reports involving snow blowers [19]. In that study, four of 36 cardiac deaths associated with snow removal occurred while using a snow blower [19]. There is very little literature reviewing the whole scope of injury associated with snow blowers. It was the purpose of this study to analyze all types of injuries and medical events associated with snowblower use presenting to emergency departments (EDs) in the United States.

Materials and methods

Data source

The data for this study were obtained from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS). This database is in the public domain and can be found at www.cpsc.gov/library/neiss.html. The NEISS is a stratified, weighted dataset managed by the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (USCPSC), which collects injury data from ~100 hospitals in the US and its territories with an ED and designed to study injuries due to consumer products. Further details regarding the acquisition of the NEISS data and guidelines for the use of such data can be accessed from its web site.

Detailed data for ED visits for the period 2003 through 2018 due to snow blowers/snow throwers (NEISS product code 1406) was downloaded from the NEISS website and analyzed by age, sex, diagnosis, race, anatomic location of the injury, and year/month/weekday of the ED visit. Race was classified as White, Black, Amerindian (Hispanic and Native American), and Asian [22]. The use of this publicly available, de-identified data was considered exempt by our local Institutional Review Board. 

The narrative comments for each case were further analyzed to review other parameters. The mechanism of injury was classified into six major groups: 1) put/reached hand into snowblower chute, 2) fell/slipped while using the snow blower, 3) run over by the snow blower, 4) other encounters, 5) missiles projected from the snow blower (eg. snow, ice, sand), and 6) medical issues (eg, syncope, shortness of breath, angina/cardiac arrest). Examples of other encounters are soreness/pain after using the snow blower, injuries while moving/repairing the snow blower, etc. Alcohol involvement was determined by searching the detailed comments with the FIND command in Microsoft Excel™ (Microsoft® Office 365, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA). The terms used to search for alcohol were: alcohol, EtOH, intoxicated, drinking, drank, drunk, club, ethanol, saloon, tavern, liquor, booze, beer, whiskey, brandy, rum, vodka, scotch, tequila, wine, sake, champagne, and cognac. 

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed with SUDAAN 11.0.01™ software (RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 2013), which accounts for the weighted, stratified nature of the data. The estimated number of injuries/ED visits is calculated, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the estimate. When the actual number of patients (n) is < 20, the estimated number (N) becomes unstable and should be interpreted with caution; thus, we report both n and N. The annual incidence of ED visits for assault was calculated using US Census Bureau data. Analyses between groups of continuous data were performed with the t-test (two groups) or analysis of variance (ANOVA) (three or more groups). Differences between groups of categorical data were analyzed by the chi-square test. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

There were 1,921 actual ED visits for snowblower injuries, or an estimated 91,451 (79,800 - 104,894) over the time span of the study. These 91,451 ED visits represent 0.041% of all estimated consumer product related ED (220,819,326) visits in the NEISS data base over the same time span. The average age was 51.0 years (49.7, 52.1) and the median age was 50.9 years (interquartile range (39.1, 62.5 years)). Most of the patients were male (83,409 (81,382 - 85,059) - 91.2%) and released from the ED (79,185 (76,083 - 81,699) - 86.6%). Race was known in 63,752 of the patients and was overwhelmingly White (93.8%) (59,814 - (57,026 - 61,489)). The mechanism of injury was known in 89,658 (98.0%) of the patients. The patient placed the hand into the chute in 44.5% (40,692 (35,611 - 48,112)), other mechanisms in 31.5% (28,835 (25,277 - 33,873)), a fall/slip in 13.3% (12,172 (10,535 - 14,568)), medical events in 6.1% (5,580 (4,563 - 7,078)), a missile/projectile in 1.3% (1,230 (796 - 1,975)), and being run over by the snow blower in 1.0% (871 - (521 - 1,500)). The incident location was at the home in 68.9% (62,989 (49,722 - 73,554)), unknown in 29.3% (26,780 (16,278 - 40,412)), with those occurring on the street, other public property, school, and recreation/sporting facilities accounting for the remaining 1.9%. Alcohol was involved in 0.4% (354 (183 - 695)) of the patients.

Medical events

Patients with medical events (Table 1) were older than those with injuries (60.1 vs 50.4 years - p < 10-4). There were an estimated 648 deaths; all occurred in those with medical events. A cardiac event is a subset of all medical events. Cardiac events were identified when the narrative comments included the following terms: myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac, arrhythmia, angina, cardiovascular disease, heart attack. Those with a cardiac event were again older (68.1 vs 50.7 years - p < 10-4) (Table 2) than those with other events and all were male. There was one death in the non-cardiac group. The narrative comments of that case stated the patient was a 76-year old male who went into his home due to shortness of breath after using a snow blower and was dead on arrival. This may or may not have been a cardiac event as well.

Table 1. ED visits associated with snow blowers by a medical event or injury.

n = actual number of ED visits, N = estimated number of ED visits, L% = lower 95% confidence interval of the estimate, U% = upper 95% confidence interval of the estimate

  Medical Injury  
  n N L% U% % n N L% U% % p value
Total 128 5,580 6,190 4,463 6.1 1,793 85,871 86,988 84,501 93.9  
Age (years)                      
Mean [95% CI] 60.1 {56.8, 63.5} 50.4 {49.2, 51.6}   <10-4
Median [interquartile] 63.6 {49.8, 70.5} 50.4 {38.6, 61.3}  
Sex                      
Male 122 5,303 4,980 5,456 95 1,644 78,106 76,090 79,740 91.0 0.064
Female 6 277 124 600 5 149 7,764 6,131 9,781 9.0  
Disposition from ED 127 5,510       1,790 85,734        
Release 66 3,020 2,480 3,540 55 1,575 76,165 73,191 78,507 88.8 0.0013
Admit 51 1,842 1,387 2,360 33 215 9,569 7,227 12,543 11.2  
Died 10 648 314 1,254 12 0 0 0 0 0.0  
Mechanism of injury                      
Put hand in 0 0 0 0 0 909 40,969 35,111 46,865 48.7 <10-4
Fall/slip 0 0 0 0 0 230 12,172 10,283 14,344 14.5  
Run over 0 0 0 0 0 17 871 513 1,463 1.0  
Other encounter 0 0 0 0 0 580 28,835 24,626 33,354 34.3  
Snow/ice projectile 0 0 0 0 0 20 1,230 782 1,925 1.5  
Medical 128 5,580     100 0 0 0 0 0.0  
Anatomic location of injury                    
Head/neck 38 1,275 829 1,818 33 123 6,775 5,704 8,033 7.9 0.0001
Upper trunk 29 1,357 857 1,959 35 106 5,092 3,640 7,074 5.9  
Lower trunk 13 700 410 1,128 18 179 9,378 7,203 12,110 10.9  
Upper extremity 5 301 120 705 8 1,217 56,005 51,078 60,576 65.4  
Lower extremity 6 240 88 612 6 161 8,394 6,997 10,029 9.8  

Table 2. Patients with snowblower-associated events by the presence or absence of a cardiac event.

n = actual number of ED visits, N = estimated number of ED visits, L% = lower 95% confidence interval of the estimate, U% = upper 95% confidence interval of the estimate

  Cardiac event No cardiac event  
  n N L% U% % n N L% U% % p value
  27 1,338 2,030 878   1,894 90,113 90,573 89,421    
Age (years)                      
Mean [95% CI] 68.1 {63.5, 72.8} 50.7 {49.5, 51.9} <10-4
Median [interquartile] 66.5 {55.4, 73.3} 51.7 {40.2, 63.2}  
Sex                      
Male 27 1,338 88 2,030 100 1,739 82,071 80,029 83,733 91.1 0.0007
Female 0 0 0 0 0 155 8,041 6,380 10,084 8.9  
Disposition from ED^                      
Release 4 199 67 485 16 1,637 78,985 75,886 81,482 87.8 0.0018
Admit 13 497 263 778 39 253 10,914 8,449 13,973 12.1  
Died 9 572 301 867 45 1 77 9 621 0.1  

Injuries

The five major injury diagnoses, when excluding medical events, were a fracture in 25.9% (23,134 (19,614 - 27,038)), a laceration in 20.2% (18,096 (15,106 - 21,501)), a strain/sprain in 15.0% (13,378 (10,482 - 16,895)), an amputation in 11.2% (9,990 (7,102 - 13,300)), and a contusion/abrasion in 10.2% (7,344 (5,608 - 9,168)). The anatomic locations of the five major injury diagnoses are shown in Figure 1; all the amputations occurred in the upper extremity. The estimated 9,990 amputations represent an actual n of 272; of these 272, 271 involved the fingers and one the hand. An amputation, fracture, or laceration accounted for 43,524 (47.6%) of the 91,451 ED visits. Of these 43,524 visits, a fracture was the most common diagnosis when the injury involved the forearm or wrist, a laceration when the injury involved the hand, and fractures and amputations when the injury involved the fingers (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Injuries sustained from snow blowers.

Figure 1

Anatomic location of the five major injury diagnoses sustained from snow blowers by body area

AMP = amputation, CTAB = contusion/abrasion, FX = fracture, LAC = laceration, STSP = strain/sprain

 

Figure 2. Injuries from snow blowers distal to the elbow.

Figure 2

The 43,524 injuries occurring distal to the elbow

These 43,524 patients accounted for 47.6% of all ED visits due to snow blowers.

Further analyses between those with or without an amputation (Table 3) demonstrated that those with amputations were 97% male and those without amputations were 90% male. Patients with amputations were more frequently admitted to the hospital (36.3% vs 7.8%). All who sustained an amputation had put their hand into the chute; however, of the 40,969 patients that placed their hand into the chute, only 9,990 (24.4%) sustained an amputation.

Table 3. Demographics of snowblower injuries (excluding medical events) by presence/absence of an amputation.

n = actual number of ED visits, N = estimated number of ED visits, L% = lower 95% confidence interval of the estimate, U% = upper 95% confidence interval of the estimate

  Amputation No amputation  
  n N L% U% % n N L% U% % p value
Total 272 9,990 7,256 13,568 11.6 1,521 75,881 72,303 78,615 88.4 -
Age (years)                      
Mean [95% CI] 50.7 {48.2, 53.2} 50.3 {49.1, 51.5} 0.77
Median [interquartile] 51.2 {38.3, 61.9} 50.3 {38.7, 61.3}  
Sex                      
Male 264 9,694 9,193 9,883 97.0 1,380 68,413 66,578 69,917 90.2 0.0009
Female 8 296 107 797 3.0 141 7,468 5,964 9,303 9.8  
Race                      
White 110 6,226 5,757 6,431 94.8 893 49,957 47,427 51,450 93.6 0.24
Black 4 253 78 768 3.9 47 1,945 1,120 3,345 3.6  
Amerindian 3 89 16 454 1.4 25 1,204 432 3,265 2.3  
Asian 0 0 0 0 0.0 6 250 80 774 0.5  
Alcohol involvement                      
Yes 1 16 2 114 0.2 6 306 152 622 0.4 0.29
No 271 9,974 9,876 9,988 99.8 1,515 75,575 75,259 75,729 99.6  
Geographic location                      
Not recorded 79 2,640 1,415 4,386 26.4 421 22,818 13,666 34,685 30.1 0.05
Home 188 7,220 5,521 8,453 72.3 1,053 51,542 40,020 60,766 67.9  
Industrial 5 130 37 446 1.3 31 838 372 1,882 1.1  
Injury mechanism                      
Put hand in 272 9,990 7,256 13,568 100.0 637 30,979 26,235 35,940 41.8 <10-4
Fall/slip 0 0 0 0 0.0 230 12,172 10,417 14,158 16.4  
Run over 0 0 0 0 0.0 17 871 519 1,452 1.2  
Other encounter 0 0 0 0 0.0 580 28,835 25,257 32,576 38.9  
Snow/ice projectile 0 0 0 0 0.0 20 1,230 793 1,911 1.7  
Disposition from ED                      
Release 180 6,364 5,719 6,963 63.7 1,395 69,800 67,359 71,578 92.2 0.0001
Admit 92 3,626 3,027 4,271 36.3 123 5,944 4,166 8,385 7.8  

Temporal variations

The ED visits peaked on January and February weekends (Figure 3). The average incidence of snowblower visits to EDs in the USA was 1.845 per 100,000 US population and did not change over time (Figure 4). There was a general correlation between the number of ED visits per year with the snow cover area that year [23] (Figure 5). The average incidence of ED visits was normalized by the average annual snow cover area in the contiguous 48 US states, using data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Rutgers University Global Snow Laboratory) [23-24]. Even when correcting for the average annual snow cover area, there was no change in the incidence of snowblower injury ED visits over time.

Figure 3. Snowblower ED visits by month and weekday.

Figure 3

The number of emergency department (ED) visits by month and day of the week as demonstrated on a topographical projection

The peak occurred on Saturdays and Sundays from mid-January to mid-February.

Figure 4. Incidence over time.

Figure 4

The overall incidence was 1.845 per 100,000 US population and did not change over time (r2 = 0.005, p = 0.81) (filled rhomboids represent the incidence for each year and the hatched line represents linear regression over time).

Figure 5. Snowblower ED visits per year and annual snow cover area.

Figure 5

The number of ED visits per year (solid orange line) and the average annual snow cover (km2) in the 48 contiguous states per year (solid blue line)

Snow cover data from Robinson [23] as described by Estilow [24]

Discussion

The overall prevalence of amputation for ED visits associated with snow blowers was 10.9% (9,990 of 91,451 ED visits). Essentially, all of the amputations involved the digits. One study noted that 2.1% of snowblower hand injuries involved the thumb [8] while most others note no thumb amputations [1-2,5]. The exact location of the amputation and the involved digit is not systematically coded in NEISS data. The narrative comments could be used to ascertain such information, but this is likely not very accurate, as some coders may give information regarding the level of the amputation, involved digit, and level of amputation while others may not. For this reason, we did not review the narrative comments for the amputations and attempt to discern between right/left hand, finger/thumb, and level of amputation, as such data is likely incomplete and thus inaccurate.

We noted no overall change over time in the incidence of snowblower injury ED visits for the entire US population (Figure 4). Rubenstein et al. [11] noted an increase in snowblower-related hand injuries using the NEISS database for the years 2001 through 2016 when normalizing the incidence per inch of snowfall. When using the average annual snow cover area for all 48 contiguous states as a surrogate for snowfall, we did not find any change in the incidence over time. This is likely due to different ways of assessing snowfall between the two studies. Rubenstein et al. used the annual snowfall for each state’s capital city or largest city [11]; we used the actual annual snow cover as determined by satellite imaging and did not find any change over time. However, the change noted by Rubenstein et al. was minimal [11], indicating that the results from both studies are very similar.

The finding that these injuries peaked in the winter months is not surprising. Seasonal trends in traumatic digit amputations have been previously described [12], with winter having the highest percentage of snowblower amputations in a study from the North Eastern United States (Rhode Island). Such percentages would likely differ depending on the geographic location of the study (eg. a study of amputations in the southern US would likely show different results, as snowblower activity is minimal there). Interestingly, there was also a peak on the weekends in this study. Snowfall is not prejudiced toward particular days of the week. This increase during weekend days likely reflects when the person responsible for snow removal has time to perform said job. This would likely mean at home. In this study, 68.9% of the events occurred at home, confirming this supposition.

A major finding of this study is that cardiac events can be associated with the use of snow blowers. Shoveling snow is well-known to be associated with major cardiac events [14-21]. A previous study of 36 snow removal cardiac-related events in the Detroit metropolitan area found that four were associated with snow blowers and 32 with snow shoveling [19]. We have more formally described the association of cardiac events with snow blowers at the national level. Such a finding was unexpected, as one goal of a snow blower is to reduce the physical exertion needed for snow removal [1,9,17,20]. The narrative comments of all 27 patients with cardiac events were reviewed; snow shoveling was not mentioned in any of them. One case noted that strenuous activity had been performed along with the snowblower activity, and another noted that the patient was pushing the snow blower through the snow. These are strenuous events and perhaps precipitated the cardiac event [16]. It is possible that these patients using snow blowers were also using a snow shovel to remove snow from those areas not amenable to the snow blower. However, this is conjecture, as none of the narrative comments mentioned such activity. All of the patients with cardiac events were male; male preponderance with cardiac events and snow shoveling has been noted by others [14-15,18].

Alcohol use was noted in 0.4% of snowblower-associated events but could be greater if such cases were not noted in the narrative comments. This 0.4% is less than that for many recreational activities occurring in the autumn/winter months. For traditional winter sports of skiing and snowboarding, alcohol involvement is 2.1% [25]. However, in one study of Austrian skiers, it was 30.0% for males and 16% for females [26]. In a British study of skiers admitted for the care of an injury compared to a non-injured cohort [27], injury was 7.1 times more common in those with alcohol consumption. Hunting, which occurs in the late autumn and early winter, has a 1.5% prevalence of alcohol use [28] and 2.4% when a hunter falls from a hunting stand [29].

Limitations

Large data sets inherently possess some inaccuracy. However, the NEISS data collection protocols have 89%-98% accuracy [30]. Second, the NEISS only captures those who sought care in the ED; those seeking care in physician’s offices or urgent care centers are not captured. This might apply to minor sprains, contusions, but the more severe open injuries, medical events, and fractures are likely captured. This, of course, decreases the number of patients and might skew the results regarding the demographics and types of injuries. Details of the amputations such as the level of the finger amputation (tuft, joint/phalanx level), laterality, and finger versus thumb are not coded in the NEISS data set. Finally, the percentage of amputations described in this study only reflects the immediate number; it is possible that secondary amputations were performed after the initial ED visit. The magnitude of this is unknown.

Conclusions

This study has characterized the demographics and associated injury patterns associated with snowblower use in patients presenting to US emergency departments. The average annual incidence of ED visits for snowblower-associated events was 1.85 per 100,000 US population and did not change from 2003 through 2018. Of the 91,451 estimated ED visits for snowblower-associated events, 9,990 (10.9%) sustained an acute amputation and 5,580 (6.1%) a medical event, with 1.5% a cardiac event (1,378 of 91,451). ED mortality for the cardiac events was 45%. For the non-medical events, the most common diagnoses were a fracture in 25.3%, laceration in 20.0%, strain/sprain in 14.8%, amputation in 10.9%, and contusion/abrasion in 8.1%. Opportunity still exists for prevention, as there was no real change in the incidence of these injuries over this 16-year time span.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the Garceau Professorship Endowment, Indiana University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, and the Rapp Pediatric Orthopaedic Research Endowment, Riley Children’s Foundation, Indianapolis, Indiana.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study. Human Subjects Office, Office of Research Compliance – Indiana University issued approval 1805750391. This study was considered to be exempt by our Institutional Review Board, Indiana University, study number 1805750391

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Injuries to the hand inflicted by rotary snowcutters. Almdahl SM, Sæbøe-Larsen J, Jan D Jr. J Trauma. 1989;29:227–228. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198902000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Surveillance for injuries: cluster of finger amputations from snowblowers. Istre GR, Tinnell C, Ouimette D, Gunn RA, Shillam P, Smith GS, Hopkins R. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1580034/ Public Health Rep. 1989;104:155–157. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Injuries related to snow blowers in the United States: 2002 through 2008. Hammig B, Jones C. Acad Emerg Med. 2010;17:566–569. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00730.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hand injuries associated with reaching into a snow blower to clear clogged snow. Hammig B, Jones C. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38:785–788. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Snowblower injuries to the hand. Millea TP, Hansen RN. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2918563/ J Trauma. 1989;29:229–233. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198902000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Snow-blower injuries--Colorado, New York. Center for Disease Control. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6405183/ MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1983;32:77–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Descriptive epidemiology of a cluster of hand injuries from snowblowers. Proano L, Partridge R. J Emerg Med. 2002;22:341–344. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(02)00451-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Snowblower injuries to the hand. Chin G, Weinzweig N, Weinzweig J, Geldner P, Gonzalez M. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41:390–396. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199810000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Snowblower injuries. Waller JA. J Trauma. 1977;17:122–125. doi: 10.1097/00005373-197702000-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Snowblower injuries to the hand: epidemiology, patterns of injury, and strategies for prevention. Master D, Piorkowski J, Zani S, Babigian A. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;61:613–617. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e318166dafe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.The incidence of snow blower-related injuries to the hand in the United States. Rubinstein AJ, Thomson JE, Siracuse BL, DeCotiis MR, Ahmed IH, Vosbikian MM. Ann Plast Surg. 2019;82:393–398. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Seasonal trends in traumatic digit amputations: experience of a level 1 and level II hospital in a Northeastern state. Harris AP, Goodman AD, Kuczmarski AS, Gil JA, Katarincic JA. Hand. 2019;[Epub] doi: 10.1177/1558944719844347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hand injuries from snow blowers: a report of an epidemic. Tetz DJ, Aghababian R. Prehospital Disaster Med. 1995;10:265–267. doi: 10.1017/s1049023x0004214x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Association between quantity and duration of snowfall and risk of myocardial infarction. Auger N, Potter BJ, Smargiassi A, Bilodeau-Bertrand M, Clément Paris, Kosatsky T. Can Med Assoc J. 2017;189:235–242. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.161064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Snow-shoveling and the risk of acute coronary syndromes. Nichols RB, McIntyre WF, Chan S, Scogstad-Stubbs D, Hopman WM, Baranchuk A. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012;101:11–15. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0356-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Snow shoveling: a trigger for acute myocardial infarction and sudden coronary death. Franklin BA, Bonzheim K, Gordon S, Timmis GC. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:855–858. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89181-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cardiac demands of heavy snow shoveling. Franklin BA, Hogan P, Bonzheim K, Bakalyar D, Terrien E, Gordon S, Timmis GC. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/387498. JAMA. 1995;273:880–992. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.The snow, the men, the shovel, the risk? ER admissions after snow shovelling: 13 winters in Bern. Sauter T, Haider DG, Ricklin ME, Exadaktylos AK. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:14104. doi: 10.4414/smw.2015.14104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sudden cardiac death after manual or automated snow removal. Chowdhury PS, Franklin BA, Boura JA, et al. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92:833–835. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00894-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Coagulation and fibrinolytic responses to manual versus automated snow removal. Womack CJ, Paton CM, Coughlin AM, Nagelkirk PR, Dejong AT, Anderson J, Franklin BA. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1755–1759. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000089254.78325.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Snow shovel-related injuries and medical emergencies treated in US EDs, 1990 to 2006. Watson DS, Shields BJ, Smith GA. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eveleth PB, Tanner JM. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 1990. Worldwide Variation in Human Growth. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce NOAA climate data record (CDR) of northern hemisphere (NH) snow cover extent (SCE), version 1. [Apr;2020 ];Robinson DA, Estilow TW. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/noaa-climate-data-record-cdr-of-northern-hemisphere-nh-snow-cover-extent-sce-version-1 2020
  • 24.A long-term northern hemisphere snow cover extent data record for climate studies and monitoring. Estilow TW, Young AH, Robinson DA. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2015;7:137–142. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Injury patterns and risk factors for orthopaedic trauma from snowboarding and skiing: a national perspective. Basques BA, Gardner EC, Samuel AM, Webb ML, Lukasiewicz AM, Bohl DD, Grauer JN. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018;26:1916–2016. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4137-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.The use of medication and alcohol in recreational downhill skiers: results of a survey including 816 subjects in Tyrol. Menz V, Philippe M, Pocecco E, Ruedl G, Woldrich T, Sommersacher R, Burtscher M. J Sci Med Sport. 2019;22:22–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2019.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Are there risk factors in alpine skiing? A controlled multicentre survey of 1278 skiers. Hasler RM, Dubler S, Menneker LM, et al. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43:1020–1025. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.064741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Injuries from firearms in hunting activities. Loder RT, Farren N. Injury. 2014;45:1207–1214. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Epidemiology of hunting standing injuries presenting to US emergency departments, 2008-2013. Loder RT. Wilderness Env Med. 2015;26:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2014.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.National estimates of nonfatal firearm-related injuries. Beyond the tip of the iceberg. Annest JL, Mercy JA, Gibson DR, Ryan GW. JAMA. 1995;273:1749–1754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES