Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jan 4;16(1):e0240180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240180

Is the Qi experience related to the flow experience? Practicing qigong in urban green spaces

Shih-Han Hung 1, Ching-Yung Hwang 2, Chun-Yen Chang 1,*
Editor: Michael B Steinborn3
PMCID: PMC7781670  PMID: 33395692

Abstract

People experience a healthy energy gained from the environment and an inner feeling, called the Qi experience. The flow experience has been a popular topic in Western studies, especially within the fields of psychology and health, and in all kinds of activities. Our current study used quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze the relationship between the Qi experience and the flow experience. After collecting data using open-ended questions, we integrated and connected the Qi experience into five orientations: (1) the feeling of Qi; (2) the mind; (3) Qi and consciousness; (4) physical, mental, and spiritual benefits; and (5) the feeling of Tao. The results revealed a high level of consistency between the flow experience and the Qi experience (r = 0.90, p<0.00, which supports the conclusion that the concept of the flow experience in Qigong activity seems to be the same as that in East Asian disciplines, called the Qi experience.

Introduction

The Qi experience is the inner feeling that allows Qigong practitioners to adjust their breathing and consciousness, exercise the mind–body, and use consciousness to guide the flow of vital body energy (Qi energy) through the energy pathways (meridians) to maintain the essential health of the body-mind-spirit, which is related to achieving a deep and optimal state [13]. Western sciences consider Qigong to be a combination of meditation, breathing, and physical movements that is used to manage the vital energy (Qi) in the body and improve spiritual, physical, and mental health [4,29]. Enz mentioned that Qigong masters feel a sense of Tao—the laws of balance that harmonize the rhythms in humans and nature [2,5]—when they lose self-consciousness while practicing Qigong; in the same way, concerning Eastern Philosophy, Chuang Tzu stated that the proper way to live without concern for external rewards is enjoyment in untroubled ease, which is the essential connection between happiness, enjoyment, and even virtue [6]. In Taoist philosophy, controlling self-consciousness is a way to “entice the Qi to flow”, which has similar concept of central controlling one’s mind and unity with one in flow experience [7]. A flow experience is the state of focusing on an activity, which leads to an optimal experience [8]. When one balances high levels of both skill and challenge, he/she may feel action–awareness merging, loss of consciousness, and even a sense of being immersed in the environment. We generally consider the state of the flow experience in psychological attributions as the state in which one concentrates on one thing, with the mind automatically doing the movement, feeling the current consciousness, merging with the current state and environment, and then receiving immediate feedback. These psychological states might be similar to what occurs when practicing Qigong.

On the other hand, Qigong, Tai Chi, and yoga are ancient mind–body practices that all share the same three regulators in self-consciousness: body focus (posture and movement), breath, and mind focus (meditation), which benefit physical and psychological health and well-being [1,2,9,10]. Qigong focuses on balancing “Qi” in our body and mind and relaxing to achieve an optimal state of oneness [2]; however, Tai Chi refers to the martial art of meditative movement exercise [11]. The deep breath form of focusing attention on the present moment is similar to any kind of meditation, such as Qigong, Tai Chi, Yoga, or Zen activity, which all share a static form of deep meditation that evokes optimal experience in practicing [3,1214].

In the scope of the present study, we attempted to understand the subjective experience of the relationship between the Qi experience and the flow experience, which are both part of the mental state that influences mental health, well-being, and self-consciousness. To illustrate this point, we use Qigong sensory experience to discuss the overall Qi and flow experiences. We do not focus on discussing the definition of Qi, which has roughly the same scope as Feng Shui, influential in traditional Chinese landscape design, but we do focus on the overall psychological state in the experience of Qi. The psychological mindset of the Qi experience produced in Qigong is similar to the flow experience; therefore, it is the subject of our interest.

Qigong and the essence of the Qi experience

Qigong is an ancient type of mind–body exercise that emphasizes a harmonious interaction between humans and the Qi energy in the environment through breathing or movement, but it also plays a special role in traditional Chinese culture and medical healing and health exercise. In practicing the experience of Qi, natural surroundings, such as the movement of fresh air, wind, and tress, play important roles to connect body, self, emotion, and environment, especially in the process of “breathing” [1,15]. According to the Taoist view, the dynamic Qi energy, Yin and Yang, is a natural phenomenon in our body and in the environment. As one balances Qi, Yin, and Yang, he/she may become aware of Tao—the law of nature [5].

As Qigong practitioners calm down, they relax their body and mind and comply with their surroundings so they can experience Qi. Qi is not part of the imagination [1]—that is, practitioners feel a warm or tingling sensation of Qi energy floating in their blood, called the Qigong state [1,2,5]. From the empirical evidence-based description of the Qigong state, Qi involves the raising of the palm temperature, which is detected by far-infrared radiation [9], and changes in brain activity in the Qigong state, detected through fMRI [16], increasing the alpha and frontal theta in the Qi state [17]. On the other hand, the optimal experience might be found in the Qi experience. A systematic review of psychological well-being outcomes showed that Qigong reduces depression and anxiety and improves mood, self-efficacy, and quality of life [18]. However, what is the Qi (psychological) experience in the present? A quantitative study [19] described the inner psychological aspects of Qi as “the experience of Qi energy,” “Emotion.” “Attention, Concentration,” “Body-Mind awareness,” “Health benefits,” and “other benefits.” These descriptions of the Qi experience represent the main core of our study.

The concept of the flow experience

The flow experience was defined by Csikszentmihalyi, who indicated that whatever activities people involve themselves in, when the activities go smoothly, they experience similar feelings [8]. This is referred to as the flow experience. It comprises people and the environment in a dynamic system, and interactions between people and the environment or a task. The flow experience is a state of task-absorption, cognitive efficiency, and intrinsic enjoyment that makes one completely involved in an activity, balancing the challenges of the activity and the skills of the individual [8,20]. The nine components of the flow experience were recently classified into two categories: condition (Clear Goals, Challenge–Skill Balance, and Unambiguous Feedback) and the subjective state of being in the flow (Autotelic Experience, Concentration on the Task at Hand, Paradox of Control, Action–Awareness Merging, Transformation of Time, Loss of Self-Consciousness) [21]. These categories both influence Qigong practice to achieve a sense of Qi and flow states.

On the other hand, studies have discussed using electromyography to detect one’s emotional state and cortisol levels to measure cardiovascular stress, while fMRI has been used to connect flow and related optimal brain activations with a wide variety of activities [22]. Practicing meditation could be linked to the flow experience, but very few studies have addressed this connection. Hatha yoga is the oldest Eastern method for training and controlling one’s mind and body and for inducing happiness. The inner feeling in Hatha yoga is similar to the flow experience [23]. Studies on yoga practitioners have reported a higher flow experience than in other physical activities chosen by participants [24]. Yoga, flow experience, and mindfulness can promote a positive mental state and decrease anxiety due to total immersion in the activity [13].

A comparison of the flow and Qi experience concepts

There has thus far been relatively little research on the Qi and flow experiences. From the perspective of meditation, we argue that Qigong activity could evoke the psychological flow and Qi experiences. In Eastern disciplines, martial arts influenced by Taoism and Zen Buddhism, such as Tai Chi, Kung Fu, and Judo, represent special forms to evoke the flow experience [23]. These activities all emphasize consciousness-controlling skills to improve the mental and spiritual state that are reminiscent of the concept of the flow experience. From the emotional perspective of practicing Qigong as related to the flow experience in four weeks of training, the results of content analysis described the affective state through open-ended answers as restful, positive affect, balanced, and lucid; the results of self-report questionnaires using the Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) showed that Qigong evoked a positive affective state, with participants being in the flow state for 20 minutes, then 40 minutes, then 60 minutes [25].

As one meets the condition of the flow, he/she may subjectively be in the flow. The subjective state in the flow includes the merging of action–awareness, the transformation of time, the loss of self-consciousness, and autotelic experience, a state which could be described as similar to the Qi experience. Up to this point, we have provided our explanation to assess the possible contribution of comparing the Qi and flow experiences via qualitative studies [19] (see Table 1). Table 1 shows a systematic comparison system for evaluating construct validity in the Qi and flow experiences.

Table 1. A systematic evaluation of the construct validity of the Qi and flow experiences.

Qi experience [13,19] Flow experience [8,20,26] Concept comparison
Definition A Qi experience is the inner feeling that allows Qigong practitioners to adjust their breathing and consciousness to guide the flow of vital body energy (Qi energy) through the energy pathways and maintain the essential health of the body-mind-spirit. The flow experience is a state of task-absorption, cognitive efficiency, and intrinsic enjoyment that makes one completely involved in an activity, balancing the challenges of the activity and the skills of the individual. As one is totally absorbed in the activities, balancing skills and challenges that lead to feeling a sense of Qi, one may gain optimal experience.
Traits The experience of Qi energy
  • energy flows easily

  • feeling energy as the participant is trained

  • perceiving energy moving in the body as a state, not in the imagination

Autotelic experience
  • self-affirmation, self-growth, pleasure, satisfaction, quality of life, well-being, and more as positive psychological benefits

Challenge–skill balance
  • When one balances skills and activity challenges, one is more likely to achieve a sense of flow

Paradox of control
  • When the activity goes smoothly, a sense of control can be generated, one which can control the activity and even the environment of the activity at the moment; this sense of control does not involve consciousness, but rather a feeling that one can handle everything

As one completely focuses on balancing “Qi” in the body and mind, the Qi energy is experienced. It is similar to the concept of challenge–skill balance, since as one balances the skills and challenges of the activities, a sense of flow may be achieved. Furthermore, the descriptions of the Qi experience are similar to the concepts of autotelic experience and paradox of control in the flow.
Emotion
  • positive emotion, happiness, enjoyment, satisfaction after performing well

  • decreased negative emotions

  • less stress

  • happiness

  • internal harmony

  • somewhat rejuvenated

  • pure essence of the soul, something deeper

Autotelic experience
Unambiguous feedback
  • After setting up

  • clear goals, one can successfully complete the goals and clearly feel the feedback from the activity

Loss of self-consciousness
  • When the activity goes smoothly, the participant enters the world of “the self” and does not care about others

The autotelic experience and unambiguous feedback in the flow experience are that “in the state of practicing” and “after practicing,” respectively, people can gain immediate rewards, such as a good mood, enjoyment, and satisfaction, observable in both the flow and Qi experiences.
The loss of self-consciousness is about losing oneself and merging with one’s surroundings without concern about presentation. However, the Qi experience is a state of relaxed awareness with breathing that evokes a sense of deep spiritual feelings, interactions with nature, and even experiencing the Tao. Therefore, the optimal state seems to be the same as that described in the concepts of flow and Qi in this study.
Attention, Concentration
  • concentrate on energy, experiences, breath and movements

  • attention focuses on movements, movement follows thoughts

  • sense of “losing contact” with reality, forgetting about life’s troubles and worries

Loss of Self-consciousness
Concentration on the task at hand
  • When one concentrates on the activities, one can ignore other things without distractions

Clear goals
  • Have a strong sense of knowing what to do, focusing on the goal, and forgetting annoying chores

As one concentrates on one thing, knows the goals, and controls one’s thoughts and actions without worries, the movements merge with the body, and one can feel Qi energy floating in the body and a sense of being lost. These concepts are highly similar to loss of self-consciousness, concentration on the task at hand, clear goals, and action–awareness merging in the flow experience.
Body–Mind awareness
  • better quality, fluency, and smoothness of movement

  • deeper consciousness

  • feel the body’s position in space precisely in every moment

  • movements automatic, meditation-like state

Loss of Self-consciousness
Action–awareness merging
The deeper one is involved in the activity without worries, the higher the coordination and likelihood of spontaneously completing the action
Health benefits
  • obtain health-related benefits

  • feel energy and reduce health imbalances in the body

  • feel better, even much better than normal

  • experience vitality, wellness, and life energy

  • decreased stress or tension

  • relax each muscle with the movement, promoting a sense of emotional wellness and, for example, happiness, joy, or other improved mood

Autotelic experience
Unambiguous feedback
Qi participants feel the Qi state floating in the body and gain physical, mental, and spiritual refreshment and recovery. This unambiguous feedback and autotelic experience from practicing could lead to a Qi experience and to a flow experience.
Others
  • Memory
    • memorize movement patterns,
    • sequences of movements seem to be challenged
    • be distracted, as one cannot remember the movement; be a benefit, as one can remember the movement
    • internal order helps memorize the movements
  • Peak performance
    • minimum effort and maximum concentration
    • remember years after practicing the perfect performance intensively or nervously thinking about the next movement; does not mention peak performance
Autotelic experience
Concentration on the task at hand
Challenge–Skill balance
Concentration on the task at hand to achieve challenge–skill balance leading to autotelic experience could indicate that as one goes into the Qigong state, he/she can feel a sense of peak performance and attain fluent breathing and movements.
Transformation of time The concept of participating in an activity that seems to encourage the feeling of a “different time flow than usual,” which could happen in a deep flow.

Aim and scope of the study

Qigong, Tai Chi, yoga, and other meditation activities decrease depression and anxiety and increase positive emotions and well-being. Researchers have focused primarily on complementary and alternative medicine or on using randomized controlled trials to discuss positive physical and psychological outcomes, such as positive cardiopulmonary effects, improved psychological symptoms, improved immune function and reduced inflammation, beneficial mood changes, and a pleasant emotional state, as opposed to discussing the similarity between psychological concepts in the Qi experience and the flow experience. The psychological phenomena in the mind–body of the Qi experience influence attention, enhance positive emotion, and increase mind–body awareness via the perception of Qi energy moving in the body, especially when interacting in a green environment. This study concerned the psychological states that might be similar to what occurs when totally focusing on practicing Qigong to achieve the Qi experience and the flow experience while practicing in an urban green space. In light of these concerns, the purpose of this article is to describe the relationship between the Eastern concept of Qigong, which induces the Qi experience, and the Western concept of the flow experience as evoked by Qigong. We used a qualitative methodology to generate the Qi experience questionnaire and a quantitative methodology to test the correlation between the Qi experience and the flow experience. More specifically, this study was undertaken to determine whether the Qi and flow experiences refer to the same concept in several respects during the practicing of Qigong in an urban green space.

Methods

Developing the Qi experience questionnaire (QEQ)

The Qi experience in this study was defined as the state of perceiving the Qi experience in the body-mind-spirit while practicing Qigong. We invited students who have practiced primary Qigong as a sample to survey their inner feelings. The study asked the sampled students to, in one sentence or adjective, describe their Qi experience by answering the open-ended questions. Data were collected on 12 occasions during the late spring and late fall (at the end of the semester) from students we considered to be more familiar with the Qi experience. Each primary Qigong course included 26 students who, after practicing, were asked to respond to the open-ended questions on the questionnaire twice in three different practice environments: (a) indoors, (b) the built environment within natural surroundings, and (c) the natural environment, beside an ecological pond (see Figs 13). Based on Table 1, participants described their Qi experiences as “feeling energy in the body,” “concentrating on breath and action,” “losing contact with reality,” “decreased stress,” and “a peak experience”.

Fig 1. The indoor location where primary students usually practice Qigong.

Fig 1

Fig 3. The natural environment, beside an ecological pond, where primary students usually practice Qigong.

Fig 3

The Qi experience questionnaires were actively discussed with three Qigong masters, who had practiced for over 10 years, and with three researchers to rephrase the descriptive sentences or adjectives into one sentence. We identified the similar concepts and integrated and connected them into five categories (and a total of 14 items) (see in Table 2): (1) the feeling of Qi (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90), (2) the mind (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93), (3) the Qi and consciousness (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86), (4) the physical, mental, and spiritual benefits (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.89), and (5) the feeling of Tao (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91) [27,28].

Table 2. A Fourteen questions used to measure the Qi experience based on the open-ended questionnaire responses.

Qualitative method Quantitative method
Open-ended data about the Qi experience 14 questions used to measure the Qi experience (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97)
Describing the Qi experience:
  • Feel the subtlety of the Qi experience

  • Hard to control the Qi experience

  • The obvious presence of Qi energy floating in the body

  • Strong Qi experience

  • No sense of Qi; Less sense of Qi energy; No activation of Qi; No special feeling; Weak Qi; feel good but don’t know how to master Qi

  • Feel the Qi floating

  • Feel a good sense of Qi

  • Sense of Qi

Feeling of Qi (FQ)
1. In this practice, I feel a good sense of Qi.
  • Smoothly practicing Qi

  • Qi is concentrated in one spot but cannot easy flow into other spots

  • Feel more concentrated on Qi floating

  • A little magical; weird

  • Difficult to control the Qi floating

2. In this practice, I feel I am smoothly practicing Qi.
  • Spontaneous and automatic production of Qi feels scary but relaxing

  • The traditional environment of Qi is distributed in this practice, maybe the predecessors’ Qi exists here

  • Easy to go into the Qi state

  • I feel that the Qi energy is much stronger in the natural environment

  • Feel a stronger Qi energy in the outdoor environment and makes the exercises more fluent

  • Strong Qi feeling in an outdoor environment

3. In this practice, I feel my body and mind may quickly go into the state of Qi.
Mind:
  • Sometimes calm, sometimes messy

  • Quiet and peaceful

  • Calm

  • Easy and stress-free

  • Smooth flow

Mind (M)
4. In this practice, I feel tranquility.
  • Comfortable

  • Relaxed

  • Leisurely

  • Happy

  • The overall feeling is quite comfortable, but the degree of practice needs to be strengthened

  • No feeling anxious, uneasy, doubtful, stressful

  • Confused, trance-like

  • Good mood, pleasant

  • Enjoying the moment

5. In this practice, I feel happy and comfortable.
  • Release pressure

  • Release stress

  • No anxiety

6. After practicing, I think my pressure may be released.
  • Restructure thoughts

7. After practicing, I think I can restructure my thoughts.
Qi and Consciousness:
  • Feeling that Qi energy is more concentrated

  • Mindlessness, no distractions

  • Focus on the state of Qi

  • Cannot concentrate on practice

  • Quiet and with no worries

Qi and Consciousness (QC)
8. In this practice, I can focus on my consciousness.
  • Thoughts follow actions

  • Clear goal to make thoughts follow the Qi

9. In this practice, I feel my thoughts follow my actions.
Physical, mental, & spiritual benefits:
  • Full of energy

  • Good mental state

  • Spiritually relaxed

  • The same practice as usual, but feels much better in mental recovery

  • The progress is not ideal, but with more practice, the body and mind will relax

  • Physical and mental relaxation

Physical, Mental, and Spiritual Benefits (PMSB)
10. After practicing, I feel full of energy in body-mind-spirit.
  • Recovery of body and mind

  • Relaxed and happy, refreshing body and mind

11. After practicing, I can totally refresh my body and mind.
  • Whole body is relaxed and comfortable

  • Sense of being healthy

  • Body relaxed

12. After practicing, my whole body relaxes and is more comfortable.
Tao:
  • When practicing, I seem to be too eager to concentrate on the spirit

  • Follow a clear heart

  • Govern by doing nothing that goes against nature (無為而治、順其自然)

  • Be happy and pleased with nature

Feeling of Tao (FT)
13. In this practice, my spirit is clear and has a deep understanding of nature.
  • Unity of heaven and human; Tao follows nature

  • Realize the Tao

14. In this practice, I can feel the meaning of “Tao follows nature” (道法自然).
Others
1. Personal status:
  • Not feel comfortable today

  • Dizzy, uncomfortable, headache

  • Cannot concentrate on practicing due to personal physical condition

  • Lack of sleeping, feeling less active today

  • Went to bed too late, cannot practice well

  • Do not have enough sleep, feel dizzy, and use Tai Chi movements to reduce pain

  • Too tired

  • Anxious because of the exam

  • A further understanding of the body

  • Not meeting goals

A few subjects mentioned problems with their personal routine, such as a lack of sleep, that might influence Qi practicing; however, these statements are not integral to describing “the state of perceived Qi experience in body-mind-spirit.”
2. State of practicing skills
  • No practice and forgetting the skills

  • Not familiar with the skills, but feel good

  • Skills have improved

  • It’s better to practice

  • More familiar with the skills

  • There is room for improvement

  • Skills may go even further, but there is not yet much of a breakthrough

  • Not satisfied with the skill, but it is worth it to practice and make the body and mind more relaxed.

The state of practicing skills is considered as one’s personal skills meeting challenges, but the statement would be too similar to the flow experience (Q9–12 in FSS [Table 3]) for participants to discriminate. Therefore, we did not use this in the questionnaires.
3. Environment:
  • Hot outside, much sunshine

  • Can feel the sunlight

  • The environment is bright and relaxed without burden

  • Outdoors environment is better than the indoors

  • Sunny and warm

  • Can feel stronger Qi in outdoor environment

  • Feel stronger Qi in outdoor environment

  • It's windy and a little bit cold in outdoor environment

  • Indoor classroom is where we usually practice and feel a sense of safety

The research time we chose was late fall in the indoor environment (Fig 1) and in the outdoor environment (Fig 2) about 25.7°C and 20.8°C; outdoor environment (Fig 3) is about 23.8°C and 26.1°C; in late spring outdoor environment (Fig 2) is about 30.8°C and 33.3°C; outdoor environment (Fig 3) is about 29.4°C and 25.1°C. The data were measured by the Central Weather Bureau.
When asked for one sentence or adjective to describe their Qi experience, subjects mentioned that by practicing in outdoor environments, especially within nature, they can feel a stronger Qi experience than indoors. However, a few subjects thought the outdoors was a little too hot or cold.
4. Time:
  • Time passes quickly; time is slow

  • Time passes slowly and differently than usual

  • The Qi practicing time is too short but comfortable

  • The Qi practicing time is too short to stay in the Qi state

  • The Qi practicing time is too short to feel the Qi

Time passing slowly and differently than usual is viewed as “transformation of time” in the flow. However, the statement of transforming into questionnaire would be too difficult for subjects to discriminate the psychological response in the Qi or flow questionnaires. Therefore, we chose to use the flow questionnaires instead
5. Others:
  • The movement generated is natural and comfortable without thinking

This statement, concerning generating natural movement without thinking, is similar to the “paradox of control” in the flow experience. However, this statement would be too difficult for subjects to discriminate the psychological responses in the Qi or flow questionnaires. Therefore, we chose to use the flow questionnaires instead.

aThe Qi experience Questionnaire (QEQ) scale was created using statements about the Qi experience, and the results were similar to those in the qualitative study by Posadzki [19] (Table 1). We then integrated similar concepts about the Qi experience into 14 questions.

In order to justify the Qi traits according to Tables 1 and 2, we used the multi-trait-multi-method (MTMM) matrix [29,30] to assess the convergent validity of the question, “what is Qi,” and the discriminant validity of Qi traits (Table 3). The 1–3 questions in the feeling of Qi category tested one’s ability to sense the Qi floating in the body, smooth and unhindered, which signifies entering the state of Qi. The convergent validity in the correlations matrix was r = 0.70 to r = 0.81 and was slightly different from the other traits (r = 0.60–0.77). The 4–7 questions in the mind category refer to a feeling of tranquility, happiness, and relaxation during the Qi experience. The convergent validity in the correlations matrix was r = 0.71 to r = 0.81 and was slightly different from the other traits (r = 0.62–0.79). The 8–9 questions in the Qi and consciousness category focused on the state of consciousness and concentration and had a correlation coefficient of 0.76, but it was slightly difficult to distinguish between the traits (r = 0.67–0.83). The 10–12 questions in the physical, mental, and spiritual benefits category focused on recovery of the mind and spirit, yielding an acceptable correlation coefficient (r = 0.69–r = 0.78) that was slightly different from other traits (r = 0.65–r = 0.76). The 13–14 questions in the feeling of Tao category were taken from a concept in ancient Eastern disciplines that refers to one who can understand the harmony between man and nature, for which the correlation coefficient of convergent validity was high (r = 0.83). Table 3 shows high reliability and convergent validity for each of the Qi experience traits, however, slightly distinguish between other traits. In the Taoist view, Qigong is an activity undertaken to balance mind-body-spirit and the dynamic of Ying/Yang states, and the movement of Qi floating in the body is related to holistic experience [4,5,31].

Table 3. Using the multi-trait-multi-method (MTMM) to determine the construct validity of the Qi experience.

Qi1 Qi2 Qi3 FQ Qi4 Qi5 Qi6 Qi7 M Qi8 Qi9 QC Qi10 Qi11 Qi12 PMB Qi13 Qi14 FT
Qi1
Qi2 .81b
Qi3 .70b .72b
FQ .92 .92 .89 (0.90)a
Qi4 .67C .70C .76C .78
Qi5 .73C .71C .74C .80 .80b
Qi6 .67C .65C .73C .75 .71b .75b
Qi7 .67C .67C .71C .75 .72b .77b .81b
M .76 .76 .81 .85 .89 .92 .90 .91 (0.93)a
Qi8 .75C .77C .70C .82 .69C .70C .71C .73C .78
Qi9 .69C .71C .74C .78 .75C .79C .77C .78C .85 .76b
QC .77 .79 .77 .85 .77 .79 .79 .80 .87 .94 .94 (0.86)a
Qi10 .68C .68C .75C .78 .72C .78C .78C .79C .85 .74C .83C .84
Qi11 .70C .74C .67C .78 .65C .68C .65C .67C .74 .77C .71C .79 .69b
Qi12 .70C .71C .70C .77 .72C .74C .73C .76C .82 .78C .80C .84 .78b .75b
PMB .77 .78 .78 .85 .77 .81 .80 .82 .88 .84 .86 .91 .90 .90 .93 (0.89)a
Qi13 .65C .66C .66C .72 .65C .71C .67C .71C .76 .72C .73C .77 .71C .68C .76C .79
Qi14 .60C .61C .61C .67 .63C .67C .62C .66C .71 .67C .71C .74 .67C .65C .72C .75 .83b
FT .65 .67 .66 .73 .67 .72 .68 .72 .77 .73 .76 .79 .72 .69 .77 .80 .96 .96 (0.91)a

N = 58, p<0.01**; Abbreviations: FQ = Feeling of Qi; M = Mind; QC = Qi and Consciousness; PMSB = Physical, Mental, and Spiritual Benefits; FT = Feel the Tao;

aThe reliability of Cronbach’s alpha is shown in the main diagonal (denoted blue);

bThe convergent validity in each trait is shown in orange color;

CThe discriminant validity between other traits is shown in yellow color. Significant correlations are shown in this table.

The total internal reliability of Cronbach’s alpha on the Qi experience questionnaires was 0.97. A five-point Likert scale was used to measure the Qi experience, with a higher score meaning a greater experience of Qi.

Instruments of the Flow State Scale (FSS)

In this study, the flow experience was measured as the challenge–skill balance that one achieves to gain an optimal experience state, which can be evoked by practicing Qigong. Jackson and Marsh developed the FSS [26], which showed acceptable levels of reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.93), consisting of 36 items which were based on the nine dimensions of flow: challenge–skill balance, merging of action–awareness, clear goals, unambiguous feedback, concentration on the task at hand, sense of paradox of control, loss of self-consciousness, transformation of time, and autotelic experience [8]. Action–awareness merging refers to thoughts automatically following the movements as practiced. Unambiguous feedback emphasizes that by setting clear goals and completing them, people may get immediate feedback from the activities. Transformation of time means that participants may feel the passage of time differently. Autotelic experience refers to the concept of achieving self-affirmation, self-growth, pleasure, satisfaction, quality of life, well-being, as positive psychological benefits. Research has shown that most practitioners feel autotelic experience, concentration on the task at hand, sense of paradox of control, challenge–skill balance, and unambiguous feedback; however, only the few people who feel transformation of time and loss of self-consciousness can experience the state of deep flow [32]. Abbreviated descriptions of the items on the FSS were used to measure the flow experience in sports players [32]. These items were then translated into Chinese, with the items “Qi experience,” “Qigong practice,” or “Qi” added to describe the active state of the flow experience, which can be induced by practicing Qigong. The modified sentences, however, retained the main statement of the concept. For instance, “experience is extremely rewarding” is the main concept in autotelic experience; therefore, the question was modified as “I think practicing Qigong is extremely rewarding in this time.” Moreover, the original abbreviated description for the concept of loss of self-consciousness included not concerned with others and not worried about others. However, in the current study, due to the extended definitions of concerned and worried and attempts to understand the interaction between the environment and humans, the question was revised from not worried about others to feeling of integration with the environment. The revised version of loss of self-consciousness showed acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79).

For the content validity of the revised FSS, we invited three Qigong novice practitioners to review the comprehensibility of each item, after which we invited three Qigong masters to determine the knowledge and skill level of the content tested in each question. We invited 58 subjects to test the revised FSS, which showed very good reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.98) and used a five-point Likert scale, as seen in Table 4. The higher the score a participant achieved, the deeper his or her flow experience gained from Qigong.

Table 4. The revised Flow State Scale (FSS).

Aspects Items
Autotelic Experience (AE) (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.91) 1. I think practicing Qigong is extremely rewarding.
2. I enjoy practicing the Qigong.
3. I want to recapture the feeling of practicing Qigong.
4. The process of practicing Qigong let me feel great.
Clear Goals (CG) (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83) 5. In this Qigong practice, I know what I want to do.
6. In this Qigong practice, I strongly sense what I wanted to feel from the Qi experience.
7. In this Qigong practice, I know what I need to improve.
8. In this Qigong practice, I clearly know what to do to reach my goals.
Challenge–Skill Balance (CSB) (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88) 9. In this Qigong practice, I think I am competent to meet the demands.
10. In this Qigong practice, I think my abilities match the challenges.
11. In this Qigong practice, I could make the challenge and skills equally high.
12. In this Qigong practice, my skills meet the challenges.
Concentration on Task (CT) (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87) 13. In this Qigong practice, I am total concentrated.
14. In this Qigong practice, I completely focused on the task.
15. In this Qigong practice, I focus my attention and put aside my worries.
16. In this Qigong practice, I keep my mind on what is happening in Qi.
Paradox of Control (PC) (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.88) 17. In this Qigong practice, I could completely control what I was doing in my thoughts and movement.
18. In this Qigong practice, I could easily control what I was doing.
19. In this Qigong practice, I think I could feel total control of the process.
20. In this Qigong practice, I could totally control and smoothly finish every action without thinking.
Unambiguous Feedback (UF) (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.86) 21. In this Qigong practice, I knew how well I was doing by the way I was performing.
22. In this Qigong practice, I clearly knew how well I obtained and controlled the state of Qi.
23. In this Qigong practice, I clearly knew how well I was doing while performing.
24. In this Qigong practice, I was aware of how well I was performing.
Action–Awareness Merging (AAM) (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90) 25. In this Qigong practice, my thoughts automatically followed my actions.
26. In this Qigong practice, my thoughts and Qi were spontaneous and automatically produced.
27. In this Qigong practice, I can automatically lead my thoughts and Qi.
28. In this Qigong practice, I can do correct movements without thinking.
Transformation of Time (TT)(deep flow) (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87) 29. In this Qigong practice, I feel time differently from normal.
30. In this Qigong practice, I often feel altered time.
31. In this Qigong practice, I feel time goes slowly, and the surroundings are in slow motion.
32. In this Qigong practice, I feel time stop and do not know how long I am practicing.
Loss of Self-Consciousness (LSC)(deep flow) (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79) 33. In this Qigong practice, I do not concern myself with others (I lose myself).
34. In this Qigong practice, I have a feeling of integration with the environment.
35. In this Qigong practice, I do not concern myself with presentation.
36. In this Qigong practice, I do not worry about how others look at my performance.

Study site

Data were collected at the National Taiwan University (NTU), a representative of the urban green environment in Taipei City, which provides various landscape types for nearby residential exercise, health, and well-being. Besides, many Qi practitioners choose NTU campus as their practicing sites. Therefore, in this research, we selected 30 study sites, included in Figs 2 and 3, for the process of “breathing” to induce the Qi and flow experiences.

Fig 2. The built environment within natural surroundings where primary students usually practice Qigong.

Fig 2

Participants

The research complies with the main points of the research ethics statement, which is to inform the participants of the research purpose, methods and process, the benefits, the privacy of academic use and anonymous analysis, etc. for ethical considerations. In addition, we ensure the participants’ adult age (20 years) in Taiwan, and then ask them to sign an informed consent form. The research ethics committee (REC) approval was not expected to apply at that time during the funding from Ministry of Education.

In this study, participants were selected based on the criterion that they could sense the Qi state, even if only weakly. We assumed our participants could feel sense of Qi state stability in order to test the relationship between the Qi experience and the flow experience in multiple Qigong practicing. Sixty-two participants were recruited from a primary Qigong course at NTU and from the Taipei Tan Tao Culture Research Association. Thirteen of the 52 students who participated in the study on perceptions of the Qi experience were willing to participate in this study. We randomly assigned the 62 participants to 12 urban green space experimental sites at NTU. However, since four participants did not complete the experiment, a total 58 of participants (NTU students = 40, Taipei Tan Tao Culture Research Association members = 18, M = 33.7 years old) were measured in the statistical analysis.

To verify participants background, willingness, and rights to join the study, they were asked to sign a Qi knowledge letter and an environmental experience informed consent form. They were then given the Qi-questionnaire package with 12 questionnaires that randomly assigned them to 12 urban green space experimental sites at NTU. The description in the consent form read as follows: We appreciate you joining this Qi and environment experiment. This study is designed to understand your inner feelings about practicing Qigong. Our research data are only for academic use. Please pay attention to your physical condition and then practice breathing for 10 minutes at the randomly assigned experimental sites. You may practice breathing at 2–3 experimental sites per day from 7:00–11:00 in the morning, after which you may finish the questionnaire. For returning the completed Qi-questionnaire package, you will get a small gift.

The first part of the questionnaire concerned inner feelings that described the participants’ present psychological state, comprising 36 flow questions and 14 Qi questions. The second part concerned basic information, such as gender, birth year, years practicing Qigong, and date at the time of practicing. After returning the completed Qi-questionnaire package, the participants were given a 30 USD gift card as a reward.

Data collected

Participants were asked to practice at the assigned sites from 7:00–11:00 in the morning in early spring because research [33] suggests that when the human body and internal organs contact the sunlight directly, a good Qi flow may be produced in the body. A total of 659 completed questionnaire packages were returned, for a return rate of 88.58%. Besides, all data were analyzed anonymously in this study.

Results

A descriptive picture of the data

A total of 659 completed questionnaires packages (N = 58, 11–12 times per person) were collected, including five incomplete responses. Therefore, 654 valid packages (n = 444 (67.9%) males; n = 210 (32.1%) females) were measured in the statistical analysis. A t-test of descriptive statistics presented no significant difference (t = 0.87, p = 0.39) between males (N = 39, n = 444, M = 3.50, SD = 0.59) and females (N = 19, n = 210, M = 3.46, SD = 0.59) in the flow experience; however, a significant difference (t = 2.08, p = 0.04) in the Qi experience was found based on these parameters (males [N = 39, n = 444, M = 3.58, SD = 0.72]; females [N = 19, n = 210, M = 3.45, SD = 0.70]). The ANOVA on the number of years of Qigong practice indicated no significant influence on the flow experience: F(2, 651) = 2.59, p = 0.08, p>0.05, η2 = 0.01, for those practicing under half a year (N = 24, n = 276, M = 3.47, SD = 0.55), half a year to under five years (N = 26, n = 291, M = 3.47, SD = 0.60), and six years to over 15 years (N = 8, n = 87, M = 3.62, SD = 0.66). The ANOVA also revealed a group difference concerning the Qi experience: F(2, 651) = 5.04, p = 0.01, p<0.05, η2 = 0.02), for those practicing under half a year (N = 24, n = 276, M = 3.55, SD = 0.66), half a year to under five years (N = 26, n = 291, M = 3.47, SD = 0.72), and six years to over 15 years (N = 8, n = 87, M = 3.74, SD = 0.81). The Games-Howell post hoc test showed a significant difference between half a year to under five years and six years to over 15 years. The more years the participants had been involved in practicing Qigong, the deeper the sense of the Qi experience they could feel.

High correlation between the flow and Qi experiences

The results of the Pearson’s product-moment correlation, shown in Table 5, revealed a high correlation coefficient of 0.90 at the 0.01 level (p = 0.00) between flow experience (M = 3.49, SD = 0.59) and Qi experience (M = 3.54, SD = 0.71). High correlation coefficients ranging from 0.77 to 0.87 (p = 0.00) were found between the flow experience and the following sub-aspects of the Qi experience: Feeling of Qi (M = 3.52, SD = 0.75), Mind (M = 3.61, SD = 0.74), Qi and Consciousness (M = 3.55, SD = 0.78), Physical, Mental, and Spiritual Benefits (M = 3.54, SD = 0.77), and Feeling of Tao (M = 3.42, SD = 0.81). Moreover, there was a positive correlation coefficient of 0.77 (p = 0.00) between the flow experience and the feeling of deep Qi experience (Feeling of Tao).

Table 5. The relationship between the flow experience and the Qi experience.

Aspects F AE CG CSB CT PC UF AAM. TT LSC QI FQ M QC PMSB deepQi
Flow experience (F) 1
 Autotelic experience (AE) .87** 1
 Clear Goals (CG) .82** .68** 1
 Challenge-Skill Balance (CSB) .89** .75** .77** 1
 Concentration on Task (CT) .85** .74** .62** .80** 1
 Paradox of Control (PC) .92** .77** .77** .86** .81** 1
 Unambiguous Feedback (UF) .91** .75** .83** .86** .76** .89** 1
 Action–Awareness Merging (AAM) .90** .72** .81** .83** .73** .88** .88** 1
 Transformation of Time (deep flow) (TT) .78** .65** .52** .61** .60** .65** .63** .62** 1
 Loss of Self-Consciousness (deep flow) (LSC) .88** .78** .63** .70** .74** .76** .71** .73** .75** 1
Qi experience (QI) .90** .87** .76** .82** .79** .84** .83** .81** .68** .78** 1
 Feeling of Qi (FQ) .86** .83** .72** .79** .77** .80** .79** .76** .63** .74** .93** 1
 Mind (M) .83** .84** .67** .74** .74** .76** .73** .70** .65** .74** .95** .85** 1
 Qi and Consciousness (QC) .86** .82** .73** .78** .74** .81** .80** .78** .66** .74** .95** .85** .87** 1
 Physical, Mental, and Spiritual Benefits (PMSB) .87** .82** .75** .79** .74** .82** .82** .80** .65** .75** .96** .85** .88** .91** 1
 Feeling of Tao (deep Qi) .77** .72** .69** .69** .65** .71** .74** .71** .57** .68** .86** .73** .77** .79** .80** 1

N = 58, p<0.01**.

On the other hand, the seven aspects of the flow experience and the Qi experience were highly correlated, with coefficients ranging from r = 0.76 to 0.87 (p = 0.00). These seven aspects are as follows: Autotelic Experience (M = 3.55, SD = 0.76), Clear Goals (M = 3.60, SD = 0.60), Challenge–Skill Balance (M = 3.48, SD = 0.62), Concentration on Task at Hand (M = 3.48, SD = 0.70), Paradox of Control (M = 3.57, SD = 0.66), Unambiguous Feedback (M = 3.48 SD = 0.64), Action–Awareness Merging (M = 3.54, SD = 0.66). Transformation of Time (M = 3.25, SD = 0.72) and Loss of Self-Consciousness (M = 3.45, SD = 0.69) were in general correlated with Qi experience, which coefficients ranging from r = 0.68 to 0.78 (p = 0.00). A deep flow (Transformation of Time and Loss of Self-Consciousness) seems to be closely connected to a deep Qi (Feeling of Tao) (r = 0.57 to 0.68, p = 0.00), and for more information of data shown in S1 Appendix.

Based on the statistical analysis, the study indicated a high correlation between the flow and Qi experiences, which the conceptualization (Table 1) could be examined by statistical analysis in flow and Qi experiences (Table 5). First, the feeling of Qi is highly related to Autotelic Experience (r = 0.83), Paradox of Control (r = 0.80), and Challenge–Skill Balance (r = 0.79). As one practices Qi well, they feel a sense of the Qi experience. Second, the mind presence in the Qi experience is similar to the Autotelic Experience (r = 0.84), Paradox of Control (r = 0.76), and Loss of Self-Consciousness (r = 0.74), i.e., when one controls the Qi state, one feels an optimal experience from practicing Qi. Third, Qi consciousness is linked to Autotelic Experience (r = 0.82), Paradox of Control (r = 0.81), Unambiguous Feedback (r = 0.80), and Action–Awareness Merging (r = 0.78), which concerns controlling one’s thoughts and actions without worrying and, while merging body movements with Qi, feeling a sense of Qi and the loss of oneself. Fourth, the physical, mental, and spiritual benefits are similar to the Paradox of Control (r = 0.82), Autotelic Experience (r = 0.82), and Unambiguous Feedback (r = 0.82), which lead to the recovery of oneself and to an experience of the state of flow and the Qi. The last phase in the Qi experience is Tao, which is positive related to Unambiguous Feedback (r = 0.74), Autotelic Experience (r = 0.72), and Action–Awareness Merging (r = 0.71); however, it is also similar to deep flow and Loss of Self-Consciousness (r = 0.68). As one loses oneself and merges with the surroundings without concern for presentation, spiritual feelings, interaction with nature, and even the Tao can be experienced. Other aspects of the flow—for example, Clear Goals, Challenge–Skill Balance, Concentration on Task at Hand, and Transformation of Time—also appear in the state of Qi.

Discussion

The aim of our study was to examine the relationship between the Qi experience and the flow experience; that is, how ancient East Asian disciplines associated with the Qi experience are related to the Western concept of the flow experience. However, the scope of this study did not originally include a comparison of the discriminating traits and tools of the Qi experience and the flow experience. From the definition in Qi experience and flow experience, we strongly believe the two experience share similar traits. Therefore, we used Table 1 to systematically construct the conceptual validity, and Tables 24 to demonstrate reliability and validity. The conceptual validity presented in Table 1 shows a similarity in the definitions, concepts, and traits of the Qi experience and the flow experience. In addition, the study invited both Qigong masters and researchers to construct the content validity using the multi-trait-multi-method (MTMM), verify reliability and validity in the Qi experience (Tables 2 and 3), and re-analyze the consistency of the flow experience (Table 4). The Qi experience and the flow experience both demonstrated a highly acceptable level of reliability that indicated high consistency in their concepts. Moreover, based on Qigong activity, the overall correlations showed a strongly positive relationship between Qi experience and flow experience.

A possible explanation for the results

The results obtained in the present study yielded much support to our hypothesis that the Qi experience and the flow experience both provide similar inner feelings to those of Qigong practice. We presented the reasons for the high correlative relationship among the aspects of the flow and Qi experiences. When participants immerse themselves in Qigong, they feel a sense of self-growth and satisfaction. Also, in this process, they achieve positive physical and mental outcomes, such as refreshing their bodies and minds, and even experience spiritual thoughts. Few participants, however, obtained the state of deep flow, deep Qi, or the experience of feeling the Tao. The definition of autotelic experience suggests that the more participants feel happiness or self-growth, the more likely they are to feel tranquility and a sense of Qi, and to want to recapture those feelings. This is consistent with Csikszentmihalyi, who suggested that the more skill people have, the more happiness they get from Qigong [8]. Moreover, participants may feel a sense of Qi flowing in their body and an enrichment in their mind and spirit. This finding is in line with previous studies [19,31]. The Qi experience may also lead to a peak experience [19]. In this study, we found a connection with Csikszentmihalyi’s concept that “Qigong exercise concentrates on self- consciousness that entices the Qi to flow” [7]. This is consistent with Enz, who stated that when participants achieve deep flow and deep Qi, they may feel a sense of spirituality and Tao [6].

The findings lead us to believe that there is a positive relationship between deep flow, such as the aspects of transformation of time and loss of self-consciousness, and the Qi experience (feeling of Tao). When a participant loses self-consciousness in a short period of time or feels a difference in the passage of time, Tao and a higher level of happiness from Qigong activity may be realized. The findings support earlier research [2,5,6] indicating that a person who practices spiritual Qigong may feel a loss of self-consciousness and achieve the state of Tao. Tao is the concept of humanity and follows the laws of nature. This is similar to TianrenHeyi (天人合一), which integrates the harmony between humans, nature, and the world [1,6].

Limitations and recommendations for future research

This study addressed the question of the relationship between flow and Qi when practicing in an urban green environment, albeit with some limitations. The first limitation concerns the assessment used in the current study. Despite having employed a large number of participants and multiple task times, a control group was not used. However, the data nonetheless lend support to idea central to both the Qi experience and the flow experience. The criteria that were used to recruit participants attempt to avoid the placebo effect. Moreover, the results led us believe there were difference between novice (practicing under half a year) and master (practicing more than six years) practitioners in their experience of the sense of Qi, indicating that the assessment process was reliable.

Urban green space plays a critical role in supporting the flow and Qi experiences; however, the differences between outdoor and indoor environments were beyond the main scope of this paper. In addition, Qigong practice locations were different than usual, due to the statement that practicing outdoors is better for “breathing” [1]. According to this statement of Tao and TianrenHeyi, the term biophilia, coined by Wilson [34], suggests that humans have a deep affiliation to nature rooted in our biology and would rather engage in the natural environment than in an urban environment, which might be another explanation for why Qi participants experience Qi and flow more readily in an urban green environment. By using qualitative methods (see Table 1) to develop the Qi experience questionnaires, we found that participants believed that an outdoor environment with trees, sunlight, and a comfortable microclimate induces a better Qi and flow experience than an indoor environment with no natural elements.

The third limitation is rooted in the daily microclimate in different study sites, which might affect Qigong practice but were not directly controlled in this study. However, the study period was in the early spring to avoid wind, humidity, or hot.

It is challenging to depict our findings, but they could be further examined and widely applied in the future. A suggestion for future studies is to precisely control extraneous variables, such as physical indices that might influence the results. Investigating these physical indices—for instance, heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), electroencephalography (EEG), and electromyography (EMG)—could be accomplished by having practitioners wear wearable devices while practicing Qigong. Doing so could further help in understanding the relationship between landscape, flow, and the Qi experience. Also, comparing different types of outdoor environments would enhance understanding of how urban green spaces influence the Qi experience and the flow experience.

Conclusions

The Western concept of the flow experience in outdoor activities (Qigong) seems to be the same as that emphasized in East Asian disciplines, i.e., the Qi experience. This study thus sought to demonstrate the similarities between the feelings evoked by the Qi experience and the flow experience. It was concluded that the Qi experience, as a concept, can be partially explained by the flow experience. This is because while the flow experience follows a measurable scale, Qi is a vague concept, one which nevertheless truly exists in the environment. In this study, the Qi experience was explored via Qi practitioners’ perspectives and depictions of their psychological feelings toward interaction with the environment. The study first used qualitative methods to generate the Qi experience questionnaire, after which quantitative methods were used to test practitioners’ Qi experience while practicing, thereby better understanding the Qi experience. The study also yielded some contributions to the development of the Qi experience.

The study converted qualitative answers to quantitative questionnaires in order to more empirically measure the scale of the Qi experience. From the qualitative methodology, the study inferred that the spiritual level of Qi practitioners encompassed feelings of TianrenHeyi, happiness, and Tao. From the quantitative methodology, the results showed that when a Qi practitioner goes into a deep flow experience, he/she feels the transformation of time and loss of self-consciousness. These concepts are linked to a sense of integration with the environment, a sense of transformation of time, a sense of concentration, and a sense of autotelic experience, which are all part of the flow experience. Therefore, these findings could be usefully applied to better understand the concept of the Qi experience and the flow experience.

Moreover, to understand the Qi and flow experiences in an urban green space, it is essential to connect Eastern and Western science in a more holistic and environmentally conscious way for the benefit of humans. The results of this study demonstrate that humans act as a Qi sensor to detect perceptions of the Qi experience and the flow experience in urban green spaces. Future research is required to test how the surrounding environment affects one’s psychological state and to contribute more evidence connecting Western and Eastern disciplines.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. This is the Qi experience and flow experience file.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

This journal article is modified parts from the master's thesis of Effect of Landscape Types on Flow experience and Qi Experience, Department of Horticulture and Landscape, National Taiwan University. The authors thank Editor Dr. Michael B. Steinborn and reviewers Dr. Roger Jahnke, Dr. M. Sc. Jonas Ebert, Dr. Sonja Annerer-Walcher, and one anonymous reviewer for their valuable and insightful feedback and their time and effort on an early draft of this manuscript.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supporting information files (Tables 3 & 5 and the S1 Appendix).

Funding Statement

Funding was received by Dr. Chun-Yen Chang to support this study from National Taiwan University of Cutting-Edge Steering Research Project [Grant Number 10R70613,http://research.ord.ntu.edu.tw/en/DivisionStrategic.aspx]. The funder play no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Liu KN. The bizarre journey of Qi. Taipei: Tai Kang; 2009. ISBN: 9789868442894.
  • 2.Liu T. Chinese medical qigong: Singing Dragon; 2010. ISBN: 978–1848190962.
  • 3.Shinnick P. The science of whole person healing: research data summary on Qi into body pathways, the physiology and properties of mind/body wholeness and its clinical application to disease and athletics. 2004;87–127. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Klein P, Picard G, Baumgarden J, Schneider R. Meditative movement, energetic, and physical analyses of three Qigong exercises: unification of Eastern and Western mechanistic exercise theory. Medicines (Basel). 2017;4(4):69 10.3390/medicines4040069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ai AL. Assessing mental health in clinical study on qigong: between scientific investigation and holistic perspectives. Seminars in Integrative Medicine. 2003;1(2):112–21. 10.1016/S1543-1150(03)00022-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Enz G. Qi cultivation in Qigong and taiji quan In: Mayor DF, Micozzi MS, editors. Energy medicine East and West: a natural history of QI. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2011. p. 73–83. ISBN: 9780702035715. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fruehauf H. Cultivating the flow: a concept of evolutive well-being that integrates the classic traditions and quantum science. 1993. https://classicalchinesemedicine.org/cultivating-the-flow-a-concept-of-evolutive-well-being-that-integrates-the-classic-traditions-and-quantum-science/.
  • 8.Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shinnick P. Qigong: where did it come from? Where does it fit in science? What are the advances? Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine. 2006;12(4):351–3. 10.1089/acm.2006.12.351 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ospina MB, Bond K, Karkhaneh M, Tjosvold L, Vandermeer B, Liang Y, et al. Meditation practices for health: state of the research. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007(155):1–263. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jahnke R, Larkey L, Rogers C, Etnier J, Lin F. A comprehensive review of health benefits of Qigong and Tai Chi. Am J Health Promot. 2010;24(6):e1–e25. 10.4278/ajhp.081013-LIT-248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Posadzki P, Jacques S. Tai Chi and meditation: a conceptual (re)synthesis? Journal of Holistic Nursing. 2009;27(2):103–14. 10.1177/0898010108330807 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Butzer B, Ahmed K, Khalsa SBS. Yoga enhances positive psychological states in young adult musicians. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback. 2016;41(2):191–202. 10.1007/s10484-015-9321-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kaselionyte J, Gumley A. Psychosis or spiritual emergency? A Foucauldian discourse analysis of case reports of extreme mental states in the context of meditation. Transcultural Psychiatry. 2019;56(5):1094–115. 10.1177/1363461519861842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen NN. Breathing spaces: Qigong, psychiatry, and healing in China. Columbia University Press; 2003. ISBN:9780231128056. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yu WL, Li XQ, Tang WJ, Li Y, Weng XC, Chen YZ. fMRI study of pain reaction in the brain under state of "Qigong". Am J Chin Med. 2007;35(6):937–45. 10.1142/S0192415X07005405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Henz D, Schöllhorn WI. EEG brain activity in dynamic health qigong training: same effects for mental practice and physical training? Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8:154 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00154 eCollection 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wang F, Man JKM, Lee E-KO, Wu T, Benson H, Fricchione GL, et al. The effects of qigong on anxiety, depression, and psychological well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:152738 10.1155/2013/152738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Posadzki P. The psychology of Qi Gong: A qualitative study. Complementary Health Practice Review. 2010;15(2):84–97. 10.1177/1533210110387019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M. The Concept of flow In: Csikszentmihalyi M, editor. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: the collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2014. p. 239–63. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kawabata M, Mallett CJ. Flow experience in physical activity: examination of the internal structure of flow from a process-related perspective. Motivation and Emotion. 2011;35(4):393–402. 10.1007/s11031-011-9221-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Peifer C. Psychophysiological correlates of flow-experience In: Engeser S, editor. Advances in flow research. New York, NY: Springer New York; 2012. p. 139–64. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2359-1_8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: the psychology of happiness. London: Rider; 1992. ISBN: 0712654771. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Phillips LL. Examining flow states and motivational perspectives of Ashtanga yoga practitioners. 2005. University of Kentucky Doctoral Dissertations. 336. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_diss/336.
  • 25.Pölönen P, Lappi O, Tervaniemi M. Effect of meditative movement on affect and flow in Qigong practitioners. Frontiers in Psychology. 2019;10(2375). 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jackson SA, Marsh HW. Development and validation of a scale to measure optimal experience: the flow state scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1996;18(1):17–35. 10.1123/jsep.18.1.17. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hung SH, Wu CC, Tsai YP, Lin YH, Su YP, Chang CY. Urban landscapes, health, and well-being In: Bianca MR, Tan PY, editors. Urban landscapes in high-density cities: parks, streetscapes, ecosystems. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter; 2019. p. 216–226. 10.1515/9783035617207-016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hung SH, Chang CY. Harmony with Nature-Does the Qi experience exist? Brief discussion about the Qi experience in eastern and western concepts in environments In: Li MT, Yen HJ, editors. Guide to better life: leisure for a wonderful Life. Taipei: Chien Hua Learning Resources Network; 2018. p. 123–127. ISBN: 9789864872985. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Campbell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological bulletin. 1959;56 2:81–105. 10.1037/h0046016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Steinborn MB, Langner R, Flehmig HC, Huestegge L. Methodology of performance scoring in the d2 sustained-attention test: Cumulative-reliability functions and practical guidelines. Psychol Assess. 2018;30(3):339–57. 10.1037/pas0000482 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Posadzki P, Parekh S, O'Driscoll M-L, Mucha D. Qi Gong's relationship to educational kinesiology: a qualitative approach. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies. 2010;14(1):73–9. 10.1016/j.jbmt.2008.11.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tenenbaum G, Fogarty GJ, Jackson SA. The flow experience: a rasch analysis of Jackson’s Flow State Scale. Journal of Outcome Measurement. 1999;3(3):278–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kendall DE. Dao of Chinese medicine: understanding an ancient healing art. USA: Oxford University Press; 2002. ISBN: 9780195921045. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wilson EO. Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1984. ISBN: 9780674074422. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Michael B Steinborn

15 Jun 2020

PONE-D-20-11330

Is the Qi Experience related to the Flow experience? Practicing qigong in urban green spaces

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Chang,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. Four experts commented on your manuscript. As you can see from the reviews, all referees found the general topic addressed in your manuscript interesting. At the same time, all reviewers found that there is need for more explanation and systematic evaluation regarding aspects of construct validity and measurement methodology. While this will call for some more efforts, I consider it worthwhile. Taken together, I would like to invite you preparing a revision that addresses the remaining concerns, together with a cover letter that provides point-to-point replies. Some more detailed editor's comments are provided below. 

Best regards,Michael B. Steinborn, PhDAcademic Editor

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 30 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Michael B. Steinborn, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that Figures 1 a-c include an image of participants in the study. 

As per the PLOS ONE policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research) on papers that include identifying, or potentially identifying, information, the individual(s) or parent(s)/guardian(s) must be informed of the terms of the PLOS open-access (CC-BY) license and provide specific permission for publication of these details under the terms of this license.

Please download the Consent Form for Publication in a PLOS Journal (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=8ce6/plos-consent-form-english.pdf). The signed consent form should not be submitted with the manuscript, but should be securely filed in the individual's case notes.

Please amend the methods section and ethics statement of the manuscript to explicitly state that the patient/participant has provided consent for publication: “The individual in this manuscript has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details”.

If you are unable to obtain consent from the subjects of the photographs, you will need to remove the figures and any other textual identifying information or case descriptions for these individuals.

Editor's comments 

 (--1--) Methodology of Evaluating Tests and Questionnaires In general, all four reviewers pointed to the need of a more systematic evaluation of construct validity regarding the concepts of Qi and Flow. I would recommend presenting data and results in a more systematic fashion, using the multi-trait-multi-method (MTMM) matrix, which is a traditional approach to assessing the construct validity of a set of variables/measures related to theoretical concepts. Campbell and Fiske (1959) provided a practical methodology to be used for purposes of construct validation and the development of tests and questionnaires. At its core are two types of validity termed convergent and discriminant, which can be viewed as subcategories of construct validity. Convergent validity refers to the degree to which concepts that should be related in theory are actually interrelated through empirical observation. Discriminant validity refers to the degree to which concepts that not related in theory are actually not interrelated empirically. In order to determine construct validity of your target measure, you would have to determine both convergence and discrimination. Key to the evaluation of construct validity, however, is the analysis of test reliability as reliability coefficients are a baseline against which to interpret cross-correlations. In some way, reliability (in terms of accuracy of measurement) can be interpreted as a prerequisite to validly measure relationships with other constructs.  (--2--) Evaluation of the concept of Qi As R2 indicates, it is important to show at the same time what Qi is and what it is not. More practically, in order to defend a proposition about what a test measures (in your case Qi), one looks basically for two things. The first is convergence of indicators. Let me illustrate this point. For example, in order to justify that a questionnaire measures Qi, the concepts is first defined analytically (through thinking about what it is) and then is set into a hypothetical space of related concepts, like for example, flow state, relaxation, or other related hypothetical states. In the next step, one has to collect data from other instruments claimed to measure these closely related constructs and to compare them by means of correlation analysis. The second point refers to discrimination. That is, scores identified with supposedly distinct states should not correlate to highly. For example, a test claimed to measure "creative state" or "alertness" should reveal some but not too high correlations with the target construct (Qi) and is therefore interpreted as to indicate discriminant validity. Another point refers to aspects of measurement accuracy. Crucially, the MTMM logic (see Campbell & Fiske, 1959) requires that measures are basically reliable, which again is dependent on the number of measurement units under the score (see Steinborn, Langner, Flehmig, & Huestegge, 2018). Low or even zero correlations cannot be interpreted as indicating discriminant validity if one or both measures lack test reliability. In other words, convergent and discriminant validity can only be interpreted by simultaneously considering reliability as the underlying basis. This means that low correlations can indicate both independence of the constructs and/or low reliability of (at least one) of the constructs. With regard to your study, I would suggests reworking the manuscript towards a more systematic step-by-step evaluation following the standard methodology of concept validation. [suggested literature: Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.  Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105. doi:10.1037/h0046016; Steinborn, M. B., Langner, R., Flehmig, H. C., & Huestegge, L. (2018). Methodology of performance scoring in the d2  sustained-attention test: Cumulative-reliability functions and practical guidelines. Psychological Assessment,  30(3), 339-357. doi:10.1037/pas0000482].  (--3--) Theory of Qi An essential point concerns the distinction of the concept of Qi from a theoretical perspective. All reviewers pointed out that the concepts of Qi seems important but at the same time is in need of a more systematic theoretical evaluation. What is it that is meant by Qi relative to Flow? Also, it should be evaluated whether the correlation between Qi and Flow is due to the similarity of items under the scores of both concepts (this point was raised by R3 and R4), and if so, whether this is intended, not intended, or due to a natural conceptual overlap between the concepts. I suggest elaborating more on the theoretical nature of the concepts of Qi and Flow and delineating ways of how to measure both concepts empirically. 

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Partly

Reviewer #4: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: I Don't Know

Reviewer #4: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: There are a few edits in language that should be done.

I appreciate this article because, usually the concept of Qi -- important but not understood in the West -- is discounted. This article attempts to bring Qi into the dialogue.

This is an excellent contribution.

Reviewer #2: Background:

The study aims to examine if the western concept of Flow is related to the eastern concept of Qi. To this end, the authors created a Qi-questionnaire. Subjects had to fill-out this questionnaire after doing Qi-Gong as well as a modified Flow-Questionnaire. The correlation between the two questionnaires shows a very high correlation showing a conceptual overlap of the two concepts.

I enjoyed reading the document and was especially intrigued by the idea of similar psychological mechanisms in western and eastern concepts. Furthermore, I applaud the effort to expand the psychological toolbox by constructing new questionnaires. However, I would recommend improving the document in several aspects including literature analysis, structure, conceptual analysis, methodological description, and discussion. I can recommend this work after major revisions. Please see my comments below for further detail.

[1] Conceptual analysis

In my opinion, the paper lacked a deeper analysis of the two concepts in question. When comparing psychological mechanisms a deep analysis and precise definitions are helpful for the reader better to understand the comparison. This is especially important when dealing with (to western audiences) unfamiliar concepts like Qi, Tao, and Qigong. For example, I was wondering about what physical activity is Qigong, especially in comparison to Thai Chi, Yoga, or similar activities.

[2] Literature analysis

In addition to [1], extended literature analysis could help to clarify definitions and concepts. Especially for well-known concepts like Flow, I would expect a large amount of helpful scientific literature. I could imagine that a similar relationship like the one focused on in this paper can be found regarding other physical activities as well. It would be interesting, for example, if western sports evoke Flow or to analyze the positive benefits of Qigong, Yoga, Tai Chi, etc. Overall, I would recommend expanding the literature.

[3] Structure

The reading, although a good read overall, was sometimes difficult to follow. I would recommend improving the structure of arguments for example by introducing more headlines and straighten the line of arguments. Sometimes different paragraphs would discuss the same topic or paragraphs would switch their line of argument unexpectedly to different content.

[4] Table 1

I stumbled about table 1’s content and especially its size. It seems the content of table 1 can on the one hand be discussed in the continuous text (comparison Qi – Flow) or on the other hand, can be presented in the annex (open-ended data). Perhaps the 14 questions regarding the different aspects of Qi are the most suitable content for table 1.

[5] Methodological concerns

I wonder how exactly the data collection as well as the correlation analysis between Qi and Flow was done, as the obtained correlations are incredibly high. Unfortunately, the description of the data collection and the statistical analysis is rather short. I suggest providing some more information with this regard. The following methodological issues should be discussed or at least reported:

Sequencing effects could influence the subjects’ judgments. It is however unclear in what order subjects answered the two questionnaires.

Expectation effects could influence judgments. However, it is unclear how the instructions were presented or how the subjects were informed about the aim of the study.

Selection effects could also be a problem. However, it is not reported on what basis subjects were selected or even how subjects were recruited.

Translation effects could be a huge problem. Both questionnaires used the word "Qi" and are therefore likely to measure the same concept (at least to some degree).

The validity of data, exclusion criteria, and missing data could play a role but are not reported.

The main finding is the very high correlation between Qi and Flow experience but it is not clear how these scores were calculated from the sub scores.

[6] Conclusion

The conclusion could be expanded to incorporate different explanations for the findings of the paper. In correlation designs, several types of causal (or not causal) links are possible. The structural relationship could be:

a) Flow is a part of the Qi-Gong experience (among others).

b) Flow and Qi are the same concept.

c) Qi-Gong evokes Flow depending on the skill of the practitioner.

d) Flow evokes Qi.

e) Physical activity (of any kind) leads to both Flow and Qi.

Probably several other connections are also plausible. These should be explored and discussed. Additionally, future research directions to address these explanations could prove interesting.

[7] Grammar and formulations

While reading the paper I regularly stumbled upon punctuation mistakes or unfamiliar grammatical structures and sentences. Having studied the Chinese language myself, I know about the huge differences in grammar and wording compared to western languages. I would recommend the help of a native speaker to reduce linguistic mistakes.

For example line 62 “In Taoists“ should be “In Taoist philosophy”; “In Taoism” or “For Taoists”.

[8] line comments

45 “the mental state that influences overall health”: there is not just one mental state that can influence overall health.

58 “sense of tao”: this concept should be explained for readers unfamiliar with Chinese philosophy

70 “represent special forms of the Flow experience”: Are there studies that analyzed this? If yes, you can go into detail since this seems very important for your research question. If no, on what is this claim based? And what does “a special form of the Flow experience” mean?

76 “the urban green environment”: is that some form of organization?

126 “the words “Qi experience,” “Qi,” and “Qi practice” were added”: This could be a big problem. If you change the wording from “Flow” to “Qi” you probably don’t measure Flow anymore but Qi instead. Perhaps you should repeat the analysis without these items.

142 “were selected”: How did the selection process work? What were the selection criteria?

146 ”letter of Qi and environmental experience consent”: Please explain what this consent includes

148 “from 7:00–11:00”: It does not seem necessary to go into detail about the theoretical foundation of the timeslot.

153 “After practicing, breathing for 10 minutes, finishing the questionnaires”: The description of the procedure is quite short and does not explain the procedure completely understandable. Please expand this point in a separate paragraph. Did the participants do Qigong for 4 hours or just at a certain time between 7 and 11 a.m.? What amount was the gift card and what for? In what order were the questionnaires answered? etc.

161 “F=3.32”: What kind of analysis was used?

188 “Furthermore, an outdoor environment with trees … induces a better Qi and Flow”: It is unclear where this insight comes from. Is it a quote, a result, or an intuition?

192 “Since urban green space plays a critical role in”: Urban green spaces are mentioned regularly but it is not clear why they are important to the research question. Qi as well as Flow can be experienced indoors.

Table 3 “N=654”: I am confused about the sample size. You wrote about 58 subjects. Therefore, N should be 58.

235 “used mixed methods”: It is unclear what mixed methods where used. The main body of the research seems to be based on questionnaires only.

Bibliography: Not in alphabetical order

Reviewer #3: The submitted study investigated the relationship between the eastern concept of Qi experience and the western concept of flow during Qigong. In a first step, they used qualitative methods to generate a questionnaire that assesses the Qi experience. In a second step, they assessed the Qi experience and the flow experience after Qigong practice in a group of students and Qigong masters in three different environments. They found high correlations between scales of the Qi experience questionnaire and the scales of the Flow State Scale, suggesting a large overlay of the concepts of Qi experience and flow during Qigong.

The submitted study would enrich the present literature on Qi experience and flow. However, the manuscript would need some major revisions before being ready for publication. Especially, the manuscript would benefit from a clearer structure and more essential details in the methods and results section. This would also allow me to better evaluate the quality of the methods and analysis.

1. I would welcome a clearer structure in the introduction and discussion.

2. As you have “urban green spaces” in your title, please introduce their role for the Qi experience in the introduction.

3. Please add details and structure to the methods section.

4. For example, it is not clear how many students were asked the open questions for the generation of the Qi experience questionnaire. Were there two groups of 26 students each, so 52 in total? Were they asked once only, once after practice in each of the three environments, or even multiple times in each environment?

5. Participants in the questionnaire study: Please add some details to this section. Did participants participate for only one session or multiple times? Were they always assigned to the same site or did the site change for participants? How often did they participate on average? Were students and masters evenly distributed across sites? Were the students the same as in the open-ended questions study?

6. Results: “A total of 654 valid data were collected (n=654 per person-time)”. Does this mean there were 654 completed questionnaires packages overall?

7. In the last sentence of the results section you mention that the outdoor environment had a positive effect. Please add data and results of this analysis.

8. Although you state that all data is available, I could not find any reference that would allow me to access the data.

Reviewer #4: Qi experience is an interesting topic. The study analyszed the relationship between the Qi experience and the flow experience by using quantitative and qualitative methods. However, the result of correlation between the flow and Qi experiences is insufficient to support the final conclusion, especially for the placebo effect.

Method:

1. Data were collected 12 times within the last spring and late fall, and in different practice environments, including (a)indoors, (b) a built environment with nature, and (c) the natural environment at NTU (line 85-87). According to the authors’ description, Qigong is a type of mind-body exercise that emphasizes a harmonious interaction between humans and the environment (line 54-55).

Are there any differences of the data among different environment or among different time points?

2. The Flow State Scale was translated into Chinese (line 126). Has the Chinese version been revised and tested for reliability and validity?

Results:

3. Please check which p value is correct: For the number of years practicing Qigong, the results show significant 161 influence on the flow experience (F=3.32* p<0.05, p <0.01, η2=0.010) (line 161).

4. The p values should not be 0.0. (line 162). Maybe you can use p<0.001 instead.

5. There is an important problem that all the subjects have received Qigong training, and the description of Qi is also included in The Flow State Scale. Without the control group, the subjects may know the purpose of the study, and be affected by the placebo effect.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Roger Jahnke, OMD

Reviewer #2: Yes: Jonas Ebert (M.Sc.)

Reviewer #3: Yes: Sonja Annerer-Walcher

Reviewer #4: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 4;16(1):e0240180. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240180.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


6 Aug 2020

Thank you for inviting us to submit a revised draft of our manuscript entitled, “[Is the Qi Experience Related to the Flow Experience? Practicing Qigong in Urban Green Spaces],” to [PLOS ONE]. We really appreciate the time and effort you and each of the reviewers have dedicated to providing insightful feedback on ways to strengthen our paper.

It is with great pleasure that we resubmit our article for further consideration. We have included a point-by-point response to the questions and comments delivered in your letter dated June 16, 2020 in the cover letter. The revised words and sentences are highlighted in gray in the track file.

We hope that the revised manuscript is clearer in its conceptual analysis of the Qi and flow experiences. We hope these revisions satisfactorily address all the issues and concerns you and the reviewers have noted. Again, thank you.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Michael B Steinborn

22 Sep 2020

Is the Qi Experience related to the Flow experience? Practicing qigong in urban green spaces

PONE-D-20-11330R1

Dear Dr. Chang,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Michael B. Steinborn, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Partly

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #3: Yes

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #3: No

Reviewer #4: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #3: The authors thoroughly revised the manuscript and enriched the manuscript with more details and data.

1. However, the readability of the manuscript should be further improved to make this valuable work more accessible for the audience. I have troubles understanding some of the added paragraphs. Maybe some words were mixed up or rephrasing of those sentences makes them easier to read. Further, splitting up long sentences can improve readability. For example, line 103 – 105, or the long sentence line 137 – 143. I myself find it hard to write down my work in nicely readable sentences, as I am a non-native English speaker. Maybe you can find someone who checks your text and helps you increase readability? It would make your valuable work more accessible for a broader audience.

2. In line 419 – 422 you write “By using quantitative methods to develop the Qi experience questionnaires, we found that participants believed that an outdoor environment with trees, sunlight, and a comfortable microclimate induces a better Qi and flow experience than an indoor environment with no natural elements.” However, I could not find any quantitative data supporting this sentence in your manuscript. Maybe you meant “qualitative” data in table 1?

3. In line 423 you write that the different study sites are a limitation of your study. I think the many different study sites are a strength of your study. Because, by having many sites, the general effect of Qi-Gong practice is less masked by site-specific effects.

4. Line 75: you wrote „Dao“, shouldn’t it mean “Tao”?

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #3: Yes: Sonja Annerer-Walcher

Reviewer #4: No

Acceptance letter

Michael B Steinborn

7 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-11330R1

Is the Qi Experience related to the Flow Experience? Practicing qigong in urban green spaces

Dear Dr. Chang:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Michael B. Steinborn

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Appendix. This is the Qi experience and flow experience file.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its supporting information files (Tables 3 & 5 and the S1 Appendix).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES