Table 3.

Sensitivity and specificity of TUG times to classify frailty according to the CHS criteria and low physical performance by SPPB

TUG time (s)	Frailty according to CHS phenotype				Low physical performance according to SPPB
	Men (n=1,382)		Women (n=1,523)		Men (n=1,429)		Women (n=1,581)
	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)
≥8	98.95	13.91	98.37	11.57	99.43	14.51	100.00	13.59
≥9	97.89	35.98	98.37	27.50	97.71	37.32	95.99	31.07
≥10	94.74	57.42	94.31	50.50	92.57	59.49	89.04	56.42
≥11	89.47	75.14	89.43	67.07	83.43	77.43	79.41	73.82
≥12	70.53	86.25	69.92	80.36	63.43	88.20	62.30	86.50
≥13	51.58	92.31	61.79	88.64	50.29	94.50	47.59	93.21
≥14	32.63	95.57	48.78	93.29	37.14	97.69	36.36	97.10
≥15	26.32	97.51	43.90	95.93	26.29	98.80	29.41	98.59
≥16	20.00	98.91	34.96	97.64	16.57	99.36	21.39	99.17

TUG, Timed Up and Go test; CHS, Cardiovascular Health Study; SPPB, Short Physical Performance Battery.