Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2020 Aug 18;28(1):389–404. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10508-6

Family and species as determinants modulating mineral composition of selected wild-growing mushroom species

Mirosław Mleczek 1,, Anna Budka 2, Pavel Kalač 3, Marek Siwulski 4, Przemysław Niedzielski 5
PMCID: PMC7782397  PMID: 32812153

Abstract

It has been known since the 1970s that differences exist in the profile of element content in wild-growing mushroom species, although knowledge of the role of mushroom species/families as determinants in the accumulation of diverse element remains limited. The aim of this study was to determine the content of 63 mineral elements, divided into six separate groups in the fruit bodies of 17 wild-growing mushroom species. The mushrooms, growing in widely ranging types of soil composition, were collected in Poland in 2018. Lepista nuda and Paralepista gilva contained not only the highest content of essential major (531 and 14,800 mg kg−1, respectively of Ca and P) and trace elements (425 and 66.3 mg kg−1, respectively of Fe and B) but also a high content of trace elements with a detrimental health effect (1.39 and 7.29 mg kg−1, respectively of Tl and Ba). A high content of several elements (Al, B, Ba, Bi, Ca, Er, Fe, Mg, Mo, P, Sc, Ti or V) in L. nuda, Lepista personata, P. gilva and/or Tricholoma equestre fruit bodies belonging to the Tricholomataceae family suggests that such species may be characterised by the most effective accumulation of selected major or trace elements. On the other hand, mushrooms belonging to the Agaricaceae family (Agaricus arvensis, Coprinus comatus and Macrolepiota procera) were characterised by significant differences in the content of all determined elements jointly, which suggests that a higher content of one or several elements is mushroom species-dependent.

graphic file with name 11356_2020_10508_Figa_HTML.jpg

Graphical abstract

Keywords: Wild-growing mushrooms, Mineral elements, Mushroom family, Mushroom species, Accumulation

Introduction

The accumulation of elements by wild-growing mushrooms has been the subject of numerous scientific papers around the world (e.g. Campos and Tejera 2011; Falandysz and Drewnowska 2015; Rudawska and Leski 2005; Sun et al. 2017). Depending on the site of the fruit body collection, a higher, lower or significantly differentiated ability of mushrooms to accumulate individual elements or some elements was reported (Braeuer et al. 2018; Melgar et al. 2016). Kalač (2010, 2019) has described ranges in the content of individual elements based on available literature data. This made it possible to indicate species with higher but also limited ability to collect elements from underlying soil (Kalač and Svoboda 2000). Many of the studied mushroom species have a wide range in the content of elements in their fruit bodies, e.g. Ca in Boletus edulis or Cantharellus cibarius, K in Lactarius deliciosus, P in Tremella fuciformis, Cu in Macrolepiota procera or Zn in Boletus edulis. It should be emphasised that, in most cases, the diversified efficiency of accumulation of certain elements resulted from differences in their concentration in the soil. Examples can be found in the studies of Radulescu et al. (2010) and Zavastin et al. (2018), in which Armillaria mellea growing on unpolluted and polluted substrates was associated with significantly different contents of Se. However, the efficiency of element accumulation does not always depend on their concentration in a substrate (Radulescu et al. 2010; Sarikurkcu et al. 2015). This suggests that the element contents in such cases depend on mushroom species, genus or the families to which they belong.

Mushroom families with high and low levels of accumulation of individual major elements have been investigated by Seeger (1978), Seeger and Beckert (1979), Seeger and Hüttner (1981) and Seeger et al. (1983) for K, Mg, Ca and Na, respectively. On the other hand, a review of Falandysz and Borovička (2013) as well as an original paper by Sácký et al. (2016) indicates that the efficiency of selected element(s) accumulation by individual mushroom species (mainly for hyperaccumulation) depends on their genetic properties. To demonstrate the higher efficiency of element accumulation by species belonging to a particular family, it is necessary to collect the fruit bodies of many other species from the same and different sites. It is important to show that, regardless of the substrate composition, the fruit bodies included in this family contain a higher/lower amount of elements (Kalač 2019). Unfortunately, while such a comparison in the case of cultivated mushrooms is relatively simple to make, it is challenging for wild-growing mushroom species due to the impact of environmental factors and the growth of fruit bodies on different soils and at different times. Only the collection of a great number of fruit bodies of different species, or genus belonging to several families from a large number of locations, can indicate which taxonomic unit determines the mineral composition of mushrooms.

The aim of the study was to determine the content of 63 mineral elements in 17 wild-growing mushroom species and to elucidate similarities and differences in their ability to accumulate some of the elements. Fruit bodies were collected in Wielkopolska Province in Poland from sites significantly different as regards their substrate composition. The ability of the studied mushroom species to accumulate all the determined elements and 6 separate groups of elements was determined. The obtained values were used for an assessment of the so far unresolved question: is an ability to accumulate certain element(s) an attribute of a species or family?

Materials and methods

Experimental material

In these studies, 17 wild-growing mushroom species were analysed with respect to the content of 63 elements. Because 2018 was a very specific year in terms of the considerable quantities of mushrooms collected in Polish forests, fruit bodies were taken from up to 143 sites located in Wielkopolska Province between 7 September and 29 October 2018. Sampling sites were limited to only half of the area of one administrative unit of Poland with the intent to minimise the variability of climatic, soil and geographical conditions. Fruit bodies of particular mushroom species were collected from different places such as pine, beech, deciduous or mixed forests, gardens, mulches, city parks or meadows, intentionally to verify the hypothesis that mushroom species belonging to the same family show higher or lower accumulation of selected groups of elements (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of studied aboveground mushroom species

No. Aboveground species Family Edibility Nutritional strategy Site Amount of sample collection sites Number of fruit bodies forming a sample
1. Agaricus arvensis Schaeff. Agaricaceae Edible Saprobic City park 9 3
2. Boletus edulis Bull. Boletaceae Edible Mycorrhizal Pine forest 27 2
3. Cantharellus cibarius Fr. Cantharellaceae Edible Mycorrhizal Pine forest 18 4
4. Coprinus comatus (O.F.Müll.) Pers. Agaricaceae Edible Saprobic Meadow 6 2
5. Lactarius deliciosus (L.) Gray Russulaceae Edible Mycorrhizal Pine forest 22 3
6. Laeticutis cristata (Schaeff.) Audet Albatrellaceae Non-edible Saprobic Deciduous forest 4 3
7. Leccinum aurantiacum (Bull.) Gray Boletaceae Edible Mycorrhizal Deciduous forest 15 4
8. Leccinum scabrum (Bull.) Gray Boletaceae Edible Mycorrhizal Deciduous forest 31 3
9. Lepista nuda (Bull.) Cooke Tricholomataceae Edible Saprobic Beech forest 17 3
10. Lepista personata (Fr.) Cooke Tricholomataceae Edible Saprobic Meadow 7 2
11. Macrolepiota procera (Scop.) Singer Agaricaceae Edible Saprobic Meadow near the forest 8 2
12. Morchella esculenta (L.) Pers. Morchellaceae Edible Saprobic/mycorrhizal Garden, mulch 11 3
13. Paralepista gilva (Pers.) Raithelh Tricholomataceae Edible Saprobic Mixed forest 22 5
14. Paxillus involutus (Batsch) Fr. Paxillaceae Non-edible Saprobic City park 6 3
15. Stropharia rugosoannulata Farl. ex Murrill Strophariaceae Edible, young fruiting bodies Saprobic Garden, mulch 14 4
16. Suillus bovinus (L.) Roussel Suillaceae Edible Mycorrhizal Young pine forest 9 3
17. Tricholoma equestre (L.) P.Kumm. Tricholomataceae Edible(?) Mycorrhizal Pine forest 30 3

Some fruit bodies of different mushroom species were collected from the same sites

The 17 studied mushroom species belong to 10 families: Agaricaceae (3), Albatrellaceae (1), Boletaceae (3), Cantharellaceae (1), Morchellaceae (1), Paxillaceae (1), Russulaceae (1), Strophariaceae (1), Suillaceae (1) and Tricholomataceae (4). The fresh weight of the complete fruit bodies collected from each site and mushroom species was at least 32.3 g.

Analytical procedure

Collected fruit bodies were washed with deionised ultrapure water (Milli-Q, Millipore, Saint Luis, USA) to remove the remaining soil particles and possible element ions adsorbed on their surface. Samples were preliminarily dried at 65 ± 1 °C for 120 h in an electric oven (SLW 53 STD, Pol-Eko, Wodzisław Śląski, Poland) and ground in a laboratory mill SM 200 (Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) to obtain a powder. 0.300 ± 0.001 g of a sample was digested by 10 mL of concentrated nitric acid (65%; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in closed Teflon containers in the microwave sample preparation system Mars 6 Xpress. After digestion, cold samples were filtered (Qualitative Filter Papers Whatman) and diluted by water to a final volume of 15.0 mL. The inductively coupled plasma spectrometer with optical emission detection (Agilent 5110 ICP-OES, Agilent USA) was used for sample analysis. In all determinations, common conditions were used: plasma gas flow 12.0 L min−1, nebuliser gas flow 0.7 L min−1, auxiliary gas flow 1.0 L min−1, radio frequency (RF) power 1.2 kW. The most sensitive analytical wavelengths were used for all element determinations, additionally, for selected elements (Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na and P), and alternative less sensitive wavelengths were used to increase the range of calibration. Commercial ICP analytical standards (Romil, England) and demineralised water (Direct-Q system, Millipore, USA) were used for the calibration. The detection limits were estimated in the range of 0.01–0.09 mg kg−1 dry weight (DW) using the criteria of 3-sigma. The uncertainty level was estimated for the procedure, including sample preparation at the level of 20%. Both certified reference materials analysis (soils: CRM and CRM S-1; sediments: CRM 667 and CRM 405; CRM NCSDC (73349)—bush branches and leaves) and the standard addition method was used in quality control with acceptable recovery (80–120%). All the determined elements were divided into 6 groups of elements, according to Kalač (2019):

  • i.

    Major essential elements (MEEs): Ca, Mg, K, Na and P;

  • ii.

    Essential trace elements (ETEs): B, Co, Cu, Cr, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, Se and Zn;

  • iii.

    Trace elements with detrimental health effect (TEWDHE): Ag, As, Ba, Be, Cd, Hg, Pb and Tl;

  • iv.

    Rare earth elements (REEs): Ce, Dy, Er, Eu, Gd, Ho, La, Lu, Nd, Pr, Sc, Sm, Tb, Tm, Y and Yb;

  • v.

    Nutritionally non-essential elements (NNEs): Al, Au, Bi, Ga, Ge, Hf, In, Li, Rb, Re, Sb, Sc, Sr, Te, Th, Ti, U, V and Zr;

  • vi.

    Platinum group elements (PGEs): Ir, Os, Pd, Pt, Rh, Ru.

Statistical analysis

To compare the mean content of 63 elements in 17 wild-growing mushroom species, the one-way ANOVA and also Tukey’s HSD (statistically significant difference) test were used. Results below the limit of detection were applied as the half of the detection limit values.

Because all determined elements were divided into 6 separate groups of elements, for each of them separately but also for all 63 elements jointly, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed as an initial graphical presentation of the obtained results (Morrison 1990; Abdi and Williams 2010) to show the relationship between all the studied mushroom species. Additionally, for better visualization of multidimensional data (mean concentration of particular 63 elements in studied mushrooms), a Heatmap with a cluster analysis was performed. To show similarities between particular mushroom species as regards the content of elements belonging to particular groups of elements, cluster analysis for six groups of elements was conducted using the Ward method, and particular cases were grouped based on Euclidean distance. The same analysis was used to compare the content of 6 particular groups of elements and all elements jointly determined in all 17 mushroom species. Finally, the rank sum was performed to explain which mushroom species was the most enriched with all determined elements. A supplement for this analysis was the calculation of the Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rs) between particular groups of elements, being a nonparametric measure of rank correlation. All the statistical analyses were performed using the agricole package (R) and STATISTICA 12.0 software (StatSoft, USA).

Results

Content of elements in mushroom species

All data on mineral element contents are expressed in mg kg−1 dry weight.

Content of MEEs in the studied group of mushroom species significantly differed (Table 2). Ranges of mean contents of Ca, Mg, K, Na and P were from 34.0 to 531 (S. rugosoannulata and L. nuda), 265 to 1060 (L. scabrum and L. personata), 5780 to 41400 (L. cristata and C. comatus), 40.0 to 463 (L. cristata and B. edulis) and 1850 to 15800 mg kg−1 (T. equestre and A. arvensis), respectively. It is worth underlining that C. comatus was characterised by the highest content (next to L. personata) of Mg (973 mg kg−1) and also a high content of Na and P (286 and 12800 mg kg−1, respectively).

Table 2.

Content of major essential elements (mg kg−1) in studied aboveground mushroom species

Mushroom species Ca Mg K Na P
A. arvensis 340c 827ab 19000ef 43.1f 15800a
B. edulis 73.7fg 380cd 19000ef 463a 6120efg
C. cibarius 47.2g 572bcd 39600ab 181cd 4690fg
C. comatus 57.5fg 973a 41400a 286b 12800abc
L. deliciosus 172d 521bcd 16000efg 65.4f 5760efg
L. cristata 37.9g 389cd 5780g 40.0f 7580ef
L. aurantiacum 66.6fg 689abc 35400abc 78.6ef 9610bcde
L. scabrum 133de 265d 17400ef 277bc 5920efg
L. nuda 531a 836ab 33500a–d 96.6def 13700b
L. personata 97.1ef 1060a 26100cde 172de 12600a–d
M. procera 52.6g 816ab 31700a–d 288b 8210def
M. esculenta 416b 704abc 14400fg 74.4ef 9410b–e
P. gilva 163d 881ab 34400abc 87.5def 14800a
P. involutus 74.7fg 518bcd 33800a–d 64.0f 8320c–f
S. rugosoannulata 34.0g 555bcd 30400bcd 55.6f 6910ef
S. bovinus 147d 316cd 15000fg 66.3f 6280efg
T. equestre 65.8fg 405cd 23500def 50.6f 1850g

Identical superscripts denote non-significant differences between means within columns according to the post hoc Tukey’s HSD test

Significant differences between ETEs were also observed (Table 3), as reflected in the wide ranges between extreme contents of particular elements between selected mushroom species. These ranged from 0.422 and 0.423 to 71.9 (A. arvensis, L. scabrum and P. involutus, respectively), 4.17 to 204 (L. cristata and M. procera), 35.9 to 425 (L. cristata and L. nuda), 8.60 to 115 (P. involutus and B. edulis), 0.105 to 1.72 (S. bovinus and L. personata), 0.148 to 1.20 (S. rugosoannulata and M. esculenta), 0.130 to 8.55 (M. esculenta and A. arvensis) and 17.2 to 252 mg kg−1 (L. cristata and A. arvensis) for B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, Se and Zn, respectively. Cantharellus cibarius was the only one of the studied mushroom species found to contain Co above the limit of detection (0.070 mg kg−1); similarly, only M. esculenta and T. equestre contained detectable levels of Cr (1.76 and 0.348 mg kg−1, respectively).

Table 3.

Content of essential trace elements (mg kg−1) in studied aboveground mushroom species

Mushroom species B Co Cu Cr Fe Mn Mo Ni Se Zn
A. arvensis 0.423c bDL 23.8d–g bDL 103cdef 20.4fg 0.145d 0.247c 8.55a 252a
B. edulis bDL bDL 22.6d–g bDL 57.1ef 115a 0.106d 0.786abc 6.29b 185ab
C. cibarius 4.03bc 0.070 34.8def bDL 142b–e 62.2cd bDL 0.270bc 0.431d 108c–h
C. comatus bDL bDL 37.4de bDL 96.4c–f 10.8g bDL 0.539abc bDL 86.4e–i
L. deliciosus 3.48bc bDL 10.9efg bDL 85.5c–f 18.1fg bDL 0.634abc bDL 124b–g
L. cristata bDL bDL 4.17g bDL 35.9f 12.8g 0.291cd 0.153c 1.46cd 17.2i
L. aurantiacum 1.05c bDL 10.7fg bDL 83.9c–f 13.7fg 0.109d 0.280bc 0.514cd 102d–h
L. scabrum 0.423c bDL 6.2g bDL 66.2ef 16.4fg 0.122d 0.967ab 0.550cd 54.2ghi
L. nuda 18.1b bDL 86.8c bDL 425a 49.9de 1.13b 0.482bc 1.07cd 140b–e
L. personata 14.6bc bDL 135b bDL 179bcd 15.4fg 1.72a 0.489abc 0.374d 180abc
M. procera 9.77bc bDL 204a bDL 77.5def 96.8ab 0.336cd 0.363bc 1.85c 135b–f
M. esculenta 5.87bc bDL 19.2efg 1.76a 237b 44.4de 0.367cd 1.20a 0.130d 173bcd
P. gilva 66.3a bDL 45.9d bDL 105c–f 74.9bc 0.519c 0.624abc 5.45b 155b–e
P. involutus 71.9a bDL 35.4def bDL 125c–f 8.60g bDL 0.256bc 0.398d 179abc
S. rugosoannulata bDL bDL 13.6efg bDL 185bc 35.9ef bDL 0.148c bDL 62.3f–i
S. bovinus 5.81bc bDL 4.38g bDL 61.5ef 14.5fg 0.105d 0.184c 0.674cd 43.5hi
T. equestre 2.34bc bDL 5.43g 0.348b 379a 13.2g bDL 0.381bc 0.611c 63.7f–i

bDL value below detection limit; identical superscripts denote non-significant differences between means within columns according to the post hoc Tukey’s HSD test

Considering food security, a special group of elements are toxic trace elements with detrimental health effects (TEWDHE) (Table 4). In this group, the ranges for Ag, As, Ba, Cd, Hg, Pb and Tl were from 0.111 to 7.00 (M. esculenta and A. arvensis), 0.107 to 2.21 (P. involutus and S. bovinus), 0.014 to 7.29 (L. cristata and P. gilva), 0.175 and 3.49 (L. cristata and L. deliciosus), 0.246 to 4.23 (S. bovinus and M. procera), 0.524 to 7.54 (S. bovinus and L. deliciosus) and 0.189 to 2.89 mg kg−1 (L. scabrum and L. cristata), respectively. Lepista nuda, M. procera and M. esculenta were the only three mushroom species with a content of Be above the limit of detection (0.063; 0.094 and 0.013 mg kg−1, respectively).

Table 4.

Content of trace elements with detrimental health effect (mg kg−1) in studied aboveground mushroom species

Mushroom species Ag As Ba Be Cd Hg Pb Tl
A. arvensis 7.00a 1.43bc 3.03b–f bDL 1.19bde 0.421gh 1.76cde bDL
B. edulis 1.62cd 0.130fg 2.39b–f bDL 2.47ab 0.976bcd 1.95cde 0.237d
C. cibarius 0.361e 1.34cd 5.45abc bDL 0.713e 0.697ef 1.93cde 0.951bc
C. comatus 0.175e 0.277fg 1.18ef bDL 0.669e 1.01bc 0.930de bDL
L. deliciosus 2.38c 0.741c–g 4.18a–e bDL 3.49a 0.706e 7.54a bDL
L. cristata 0.144e 2.17ab 0.014f bDL 0.175e 0.420gh 2.57b–e 2.89a
L. aurantiacum 0.208e 0.402efg 2.86b–f bDL 2.15bd 0.434fgh 1.56cde bDL
L. scabrum 0.155e 0.140fg 2.33c–f bDL 0.872de 0.270h 3.94bc 0.189d
L. nuda 0.821de 0.605defg 4.27a–e 0.063b 0.499e 0.645efg 2.97bcd 1.39b
L. personata 1.07de 0.118fg 2.66b–f bDL 0.403e 0.394gh 3.44bc 1.44b
M. procera 0.612de 0.881c–f 1.95def 0.094a 0.931de 4.23a 3.54bc bDL
M. esculenta 0.111e 1.06cde 6.56a 0.013c 0.943de 0.703e 3.15bcd bDL
P. gilva 5.56be 0.165fg 7.29a bDL 1.37bde 0.766cde 4.42b bDL
P. involutus 0.963de 0.107g 5.70ab bDL 0.578e 1.20b 1.77cde 0.651cd
S. rugosoannulata 0.142e 0.300efg 1.03ef bDL 0.367e 0.580efg 2.01b–e 1.54b
S. bovinus 0.340e 2.21a 2.55b–f bDL 0.825e 0.246h 0.524e 1.41b
T. equestre 0.609de 2.13ab 4.54a–d bDL 0.672e 0.740de 2.44b–e 0.529cd

bDL value below detection limit; identical superscripts denote non-significant differences between means within columns according to the post hoc Tukey’s HSD test

The greater proportion of the content of rare earth elements (REEs) was below the detection limits (Table 5). The highest sum of mean content of individual REEs was found in L. cristata and M. esculenta (4.95 and 4.47 mg kg−1, respectively), while the lowest in B. edulis fruit bodies (0.658 mg kg−1). The mean content for all analysed mushrooms was 2.40 mg kg−1. L. cristata was the species with the highest contents of Dy (together with S. bovinus), Er, Ho, Nd, Sm, Tb and Yb (0.196; 0.288; 0.634; 2.04; 0.063; 0.333 and 0.030 mg kg−1, respectively), while M. esculenta contained the highest level of Ce, Lu and Y (0.758; 0.287 and 0.235 mg kg−1, respectively). The highest La content of 0.443 mg kg−1 was observed in P. gilva.

Table 5.

Content of rare earth elements (mg kg−1) in studied aboveground mushroom species

Mushroom species Ce Dy Er Eu Gd Ho La Lu Nd Pr Sm Tb Tm Y Yb REEs
A. arvensis bDL 0.051b bDL bDL 0.005b 0.053d 0.076c bDL 0.594bc 0.190de bDL bDL bDL 0.053ab bDL 1.02f
B. edulis bDL bDL bDL bDL bDL 0.165d 0.065c bDL 0.270c 0.102e bDL bDL 0.013b 0.043ab bDL 0.658f
C. cibarius bDL bDL bDL 0.019cd 0.014b bDL 0.152bc 0.016b 0.309c 1.78abc 0.114a 0.069c 0.093b 0.024b bDL 2.59b–f
C. comatus bDL bDL bDL 0.100ab 0.050b bDL 0.063c 0.043b 0.473bc 0.845cde bDL 0.006d 0.048b 0.057ab bDL 1.68def
L. deliciosus bDL 0.007b bDL 0.068a–d bDL 0.068d 0.050c bDL 0.303c 1.91ab bDL bDL bDL 0.052ab bDL 2.46c–f
L. cristata bDL 0.196a 0.288a bDL 0.150ab 0.634a 0.087bc 0.037b 2.04a 0.785cde 0.063b 0.333a 0.252ab 0.050ab 0.030a 4.95a
L. aurantiacum 0.052b 0.023b 0.103a 0.132a 0.085ab 0.063d 0.042c 0.024b 0.375c 1.39abc bDL 0.044cd 0.018b 0.047ab 0.011ab 2.41c–f
L. scabrum bDL bDL bDL 0.009d 0.032b 0.095d 0.052c bDL 0.364c 1.22bcd bDL bDL 0.043b 0.050ab bDL 1.87def
L. nuda bDL bDL 0.019a bDL bDL 0.101d 0.009c bDL 0.654bc 0.146e bDL 0.059c 0.084b 0.033b 0.005b 1.11f
L. personata bDL 0.009b bDL 0.052bcd bDL bDL 0.156bc 0.099b 0.387bc 0.767cde bDL 0.007d bDL 0.037b bDL 1.51def
M. procera 0.039b 0.023b 0.043a 0.046bcd 0.312a 0.064d 0.020c 0.034b 0.458bc 2.36a bDL bDL 0.449a 0.027b 0.014ab 3.89abc
M. esculenta 0.758a 0.104ab 0.098a 0.071a–d 0.111ab 0.119d 0.424a 0.287a 0.831b 1.31bc bDL 0.029cd 0.080b 0.235a 0.022ab 4.47ab
P. gilva 0.055b 0.044b 0.013a 0.057bcd 0.105ab 0.124d 0.443a bDL 0.638bc 1.38abc bDL bDL 0.149b 0.128ab 0.009ab 3.15a–e
P. involutus 0.044b 0.031b bDL 0.042bcd bDL 0.313b 0.135bc 0.025b 0.586bc 1.06bcde bDL bDL bDL 0.061ab 0.016ab 2.32c–f
S. rugosoannulata bDL 0.022b 0.128a bDL 0.029b 0.307bc 0.074c 0.004b 0.473bc 0.130e bDL bDL 0.006b 0.011b bDL 1.18ef
S. bovinus 0.156b 0.031b 0.343a 0.085abc 0.069b 0.126d 0.060c 0.016b 0.391bc 0.763cde bDL 0.125b 0.028b 0.020b 0.016ab 2.23c–f
T. equestre 0.604ab 0.103ab 0.062a 0.065a–d 0.064b 0.172cd 0.328ab bDL 0.576bc 1.10bcde bDL 0.050cd 0.082b 0.116ab 0.024ab 3.35a–d

bDL value below detection limit; identical superscripts denote non-significant differences between means within columns according to the post hoc Tukey’s HSD test

The contents of several elements in some species were also below detection limits within the group of NNEs (Table 6). The ranges of mean contents (mg kg−1) were from 0.849 to 160 (L. cristata and P. gilva) for Al, 0.219 to 2.64 (M. procera and L. cristata) for Bi, 0.028 to 0.456 (L. personata and M. esculenta) for Ga, 0.070 to 2.58 (L. personata and L. cristata) for Ge, 1.13 to 7.60 (L. personata and L. cristata) for In, 0.015 to 0.709 (L. personata and M. esculenta) for Li, 1.22 to 389 (M. procera and C. cibarius) for Rb, 0.011 to 0.630 (M. procera and L. cristata) for Re, 0.007 to 0.064 (L. deliciosus and M. esculenta) for Sc, 0.581 to 9.16 (L. cristata and M. esculenta) for Sr, 0.315 to 5.37 (C. comatus and A. arvensis) for Te, 0.010 to 2.09 (L. cristata and P. gilva) for Ti, 0.010 to 1.05 (L. scabrum and M. esculenta) for U, 0.010 to 0.624 (B. edulis and P. gilva) for V and 0.008 to 0.087 (L. deliciosus and P. involutus) for Zr. Four elements within the NTEs were detectable singularly. Content of Au above the limit of detection was only determined in L. personata fruit bodies (0.026 mg kg−1), similarly for Hf in S. bovinus (0.080 mg kg−1), Sb in C. comatus and L. cristata (0.698 and 0.406 mg kg−1, respectively) and Th in S. rugosoannulata (0.092 mg kg−1).

Table 6.

Content of nutritionally trace elements (mg kg−1) in studied aboveground mushroom species

Mushroom species Al Au Bi Ga Ge Hf In Li Rb Re Sb Sc Sr Te Th Ti U V Zr
A. arvensis 29.1cd bDL 1.64bc 0.272bcd 0.356cde bDL 5.04a–d bDL bDL 0.154cd bDL bDL 1.07b 5.37a bDL 0.117c 0.369bcd 0.022c 0.035abc
B. edulis 10.8de bDL 0.969c 0.073ef 0.321cde bDL 6.55ab bDL 100bc bDL bDL 0.014b 1.44b 1.79def bDL 0.359bc 0.098cd 0.007c 0.031abc
C. cibarius 99.3b bDL bDL bDL 0.806bcd bDL 4.69a–e 0.026c 389a bDL bDL 0.020b 3.74ab 2.00def bDL 0.864abc 0.246bcd 0.068c 0.046abc
C. comatus 24.5cde bDL bDL bDL bDL bDL 3.13b–e bDL bDL bDL 0.698a bDL 1.26b 0.32f bDL 0.152c 0.028cd 0.023c 0.029abc
L. deliciosus 23.1cde bDL 2.03ab 0.035f 0.337cde bDL 3.24b–e bDL 135b 0.021ef bDL 0.006b 2.15b 2.74cde bDL 0.206bc 0.274bcd 0.016c 0.007c
L. cristata 0.849e bDL 2.64a 0.379ab 2.58a bDL 7.60a 0.468ab bDL 0.630a 0.406b 0.008b 0.58b 0.86ef bDL 0.010c 0.734ab 0.057c 0.010bc
L. aurantiacum 14.6de bDL 1.21c 0.243bcd 0.829bcd bDL 3.67b–e bDL 59.8cde 0.112c–f bDL 0.008b 2.19ab 4.29abc bDL 0.264bc 0.197bcd 0.044c 0.050abc
L. scabrum 14.0de bDL bDL 0.143def bDL bDL 5.52abc bDL 14.0de 0.216cb bDL 0.024b 1.22b 4.96ab bDL 0.104c 0.000d 0.030c 0.043abc
L. nuda 23.7cde bDL 1.12c 0.079ef 0.833bcd bDL 1.54de bDL 9.35de 0.080def bDL 0.010b 1.21b 0.53f bDL 0.193bc 0.127cd 0.071c 0.020abc
L. personata 45.9c 0.026 1.08c 0.028f 0.070e bDL 1.13e 0.015c 7.59de bDL bDL 0.009b 2.86ab 0.38f bDL 0.461bc 0.102cd 0.158bc 0.038abc
M. procera 14.7de bDL 0.219d 0.207cde 0.506b–e bDL 4.58a–e bDL 1.22e 0.011f bDL 0.020b 1.90b 0.77ef bDL 0.079c 0.598abc 0.093c 0.032abc
M. esculenta 83.2b bDL 1.65bc 0.456a 1.09b bDL 5.28abc 0.709a bDL 0.140cd bDL 0.064a 9.16a 0.80ef bDL 1.18abc 1.05a 0.366b 0.062abc
P. gilva 160a bDL 1.52bc 0.321abc bDL bDL 3.10b–e 0.244bc 53.2cde bDL bDL 0.028ab 4.54ab 0.73ef bDL 2.09a 0.31bcd 0.624a 0.070abc
P. involutus 35.7cd bDL 1.13c 0.207cde bDL bDL 5.95abc 0.036c bDL bDL bDL 0.013b 3.12ab 3.01bcd bDL 0.587abc 0.494a–d 0.060c 0.087a
S. rugosoannulata 15.7de bDL bDL 0.174def 0.128de bDL 7.43a bDL 7.61de 0.302b bDL bDL 0.75b 0.47f 0.092 0.167c 0.248bcd 0.036c 0.059abc
S. bovinus 20.6cde bDL 1.06c 0.197def 0.477b–e 0.080 4.04a–e 0.112bc 67.0cd 0.120cde bDL 0.009b 3.12ab 0.93ef bDL 0.267bc 0.506a–d 0.020c 0.068abc
T. equestre 42.7c bDL 2.11a 0.130def 0.955bc bDL 2.35cde 0.089bc 99.3bc 0.139dc bDL 0.037a 5.71ab 0.74ef bDL 1.71ab 0.37bcd 0.197bc 0.086ab

bDL value below detection limit; identical superscripts denote non-significant differences between means within columns according to the post hoc Tukey’s HSD test

It is probable that the elements belonging to PGE showed the smallest differentiation within all the analysed mushroom species (Table 7). Iridium and Pd in C. comatus (0.627 and 0.065 mg kg−1, respectively) and L. cristata (2.57 and 0.197 mg kg−1, respectively) were the only ones detectable. Similarly, L. cristata and L. scabrum were the only two species with an Ru content above the limit of detection (0.228 and 0.104 mg kg−1, respectively).

Table 7.

Content of platinum group elements (mg kg−1) in studied aboveground mushroom species

Mushroom species Ir Os Pd Pt Rh Ru
A. arvensis bDL 0.021a bDL 5.72cd 0.345bc bDL
B. edulis bDL 0.105a bDL 3.61cde 0.227bc bDL
C. cibarius bDL 0.140a bDL 4.59cde 0.487ab bDL
C. comatus 0.627a bDL 0.065b 3.59cde 0.263bc bDL
L. deliciosus bDL bDL bDL 1.82e 0.108c bDL
L. cristata 2.57b 0.290a 0.197a 2.90de 0.793a 0.228a
L. aurantiacum bDL 0.088a bDL 3.02cde 0.208bc bDL
L. scabrum bDL bDL bDL 3.45cde 0.177bc 0.104b
L. nuda bDL bDL bDL 4.78cde 0.220bc bDL
L. personata bDL bDL bDL 5.31cde 0.266bc bDL
M. procera bDL 0.103a bDL 3.17cde 0.213bc bDL
M. esculenta bDL 0.135a bDL 12.25a 0.222bc bDL
P. gilva bDL 0.101a bDL 10.70ab 0.284bc bDL
P. involutus bDL 0.150a bDL 3.87cde 0.263bc bDL
S. rugosoannulata bDL bDL bDL 4.79cde 0.099c bDL
S. bovinus bDL 0.293a bDL 4.21cde 0.277bc bDL
T. equestre bDL 0.102a bDL 6.83bc 0.262bc bDL

bDL value below detection limit; identical superscripts denote non-significant differences between means within columns according to the post hoc Tukey’s HSD test

Similarities and differences between mushroom species

Relationships between the studied mushroom species within individual groups of elements were described using PCA (Fig. 1a–g).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Principal component analysis for all studied wild-growing mushrooms concerning the content MEEs (a), ETEs (b), TEWDHE (c), REEs (d), NNEs (e), PGEs (f) and all elements jointly (g)

In the case of MEEs, a clear ability for higher accumulation of K and Mg was observed in C. comatus, Mg and P in P gilva or Ca and P in L. nuda (Fig. 1a). On the other hand, the previously mentioned low content of K in L. cristata fruit bodies was also recorded. PCA for this group of elements explained 74.76% (45.05 + 29.71%) of total variability, which reliably reflects the relationships between the mushroom species.

Within ETEs, PCA explained only 42.86% (24.34 + 18.52), but this was enough to show that the studied mushroom species are generally divided into two groups with a higher or lower content of ETEs (Fig. 1b). Also, in this case, the previously mentioned highest contents of Ni were observed in M. esculenta, Mo in L. personata, Mn in B. edulis or Se in A. arvensis.

An interesting graphical distribution of mushroom species regarding the content of TEWDHE resulting from PCA is described in Fig. 1c, where 55.07% (31.48 + 23.59) of total variability was explained. In this case, 3 groups of mushrooms contained a higher content of (i) Be and Hg (M. procera or S. bovinus), (ii) As or Tl (e.g. L. cristata) and (iii) Ag, Ba, Cd and Pb (e.g. A. arvensis, L. deliciosus or P. gilva).

PCA for REEs explained 59.14% (36.04 + 23.18) of total variability, which showed that L. cristata and M. esculenta were the most metal enriched species in this group (Fig. 1d). Additionally, a separate group of mushroom species with low content of REEs was observed (e.g. A. arvensis, B. edulis, L. deliciosus or L. nuda).

Similar observations were recorded for NEEs, where PCA explained 50.65% (29.72 + 20.93) of the total variability (Fig. 1e). A distinctly higher total content of the NEEs was observed in L. cristata, M. esculenta and P. gilva.

In the case of PCA for PGEs, 84.58% (66.45 + 18.13) of total variability was explained. A higher content of Ir, Pd and also Rh and Ru was visible in L. cristata, similarly to Pt in M. esculenta and P. gilva (Fig. 1f). The other mushroom species created a separate group.

PCA calculated for all 63 elements jointly explained 41.76% (22.69 + 19.07) of total variability and has shown that some of the analysed mushroom species are able to accumulate one or more elements more effectively while accumulation in others is more limited (Fig 1g).

For this reason, a heatmap was prepared (Fig. 2) which allowed all 17 mushroom species to be compared with regard to the content of all 63 metal(loid)s. The highest similarities were recorded between M. esculenta and P. gilva, P. involutus and S. rugosoannulata, S. bovinus and T. equestre, L. deliciosus and L. aurantiacum or B. edulis and L. scabrum. The heatmap also showed which individual elements are accumulated similarly by all 17 mushroom species.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Correlations between 17 studied mushroom species concerning the content of all 63 elements (Heatmap) in mean values with presentation of a hierarchical tree plot

The obtained results led to the performance of a cluster analysis for six groups of elements using the Ward method (Fig. 3). For a particular group of elements, mushroom species were grouped based on Euclidean distance.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Cluster analysis to show the groups of similarly accumulated mushroom species of MEEs (a), ETEs (b), TEWDHE (c), REEs (d), NNEs (e), PGEs (f) and all elements jointly (g)

Within the MEE group, characterised by the lowest contents of Na and Ca, L. cristata formed a separate group, as did A. arvensis with L. personata (Fig 3a). The third group of species was composed of B. edulis, L. scabrum, L. deliciosus, S. bovinus, M. esculenta and T. equestre, while the last contained all the remaining mushroom species.

For ETEs, L. personata and M. procera constituted the first, while L. nuda and T. equestre the second group of mushroom species (Fig. 3b). C. comatus, L. deliciosus, L. cristata, L. aurantiacum, L. scabrum and S. bovinus formed the third of four groups.

Mushroom species were divided into four groups in accordance with the content of TEWDHE (Fig. 3c). The separate groups were composed of one (L. deliciosus), two (A. arvensis and P. gilva), five (C. cibarius, L. nuda, M. esculenta, P. involutus and T. equestre) and the remaining 9 mushroom species.

Laeticutis cristata was characterised by the highest contents of Dy, Er, Ho, Nd, Sm, Tb and Yb forming the first of the group within REEs, while C. cibarius, L. deliciosus and M procera formed the second (Fig. 3d). A. arvensis, B. edulis, L. nuda and S. rugosoannulata are included in the third group and the remaining 9 species constitute the fourth group.

As regards the content of NNEs, all 17 species were divided into four groups, composed of one (C. cibarius with the highest content of Rb), one (P. gilva containing the highest content of Al, Ti and V), five (B. edulis, L. deliciosus, L. aurantiacum, S. rugosoannulata and T. euestre) and the remaining 10 species (Fig. 3e).

Four groups were also appointed for mushroom species as regards the content of PGEs. Leaticutis cristata and M. esculenta with P. gilva forming the first and second groups, respectively, while B. edulis, C. comatus, L. deliciosus, L. aurantiacum, L. scabrum and M. procera belong to the third one (Fig. 3f). The rest of the 8 mushroom species constitute the fourth group.

Taking into consideration all 63 elements jointly, the 17 studied mushroom species were divided into 4 groups: the first (L. cristata), the second (A. arvensis and L. personata), the third (B. edulis, L. deliciosus, L. scabrum, M. esculenta, S. bovinus and T. equestre) and the fourth composed of the remaining 8 species (Fig. 3g).

The obtained results show extremely wide differences in the content of the studied elements, from several μg kg−1 of individual REEs to tens of g kg−1 of potassium. Unfortunately, they do not explain which one mushroom species was the most enriched with a particular group of elements or all elements jointly. A rank sum showed the highest content of MEEs and ETEs in L. nuda and P. gilva (Fig. 4), both species from the Tricholomataceae family. Inedible Paralepista gilva was also very rich in undesirable TEWDEF; however, it contained a relatively low content of REEs and NNEs. These groups of elements were dominant in M. esculenta, T. equestre or L. cristata. The latter species also contained the highest level of PGEs.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Graphical presentation of rank sum according to increase of the elements include to particular groups (MEEs, ETEs, TEWDHE, REEs, NNEs, PGEs) and all elements jointly in the studied mushroom species with their classification to individual families

The data presented in Fig. 4 suggest that species belonging to the Tricholomataceae family were the most effective in MEEs, ETEs and TEWDEF accumulation, although with some exceptions. The opposite situation was observed for B. edulis and L. scabrum, characterised by a generally low content of the studied elements. Nevertheless, this was not found for L. aurantiacum, also from the Boletaceae family. Species of the Agaricaceae family were characterised by a relatively high content of MEEs and TEWDEF, while for the other four groups of elements, their different contents were species-dependent. The obtained results indicate that belonging of a given species to a particular family of mushrooms may determine a higher or lower content of a given group of elements. However, it is more likely that the efficiency of individual element accumulation depends primarily on the species.

Based on the rank sum described in Fig. 4 for mean content of particular groups of elements, the next rank sum was calculated and a cluster analysis was executed for six groups of elements. The Ward method allowed similarities to be shown between particular groups of elements (Fig. 5). The greatest similarity was observed between NNEs and REEs and also TEWDEF and ETEs.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Cluster analysis calculated based on the rank sum to show similarities/differences between particular element groups determined in all 17 mushroom species jointly

According to the calculated Spearman rank correlation coefficients (rs), significant positive correlations were determined (α = 0.05) between NNEs and REEs (rs = 0.8139), REEs and total (mean rank sum for all element groups jointly) (rs = 0.7745), NEEs and total (rs = 0.7990), TEWDEF and ETEs (rs = 0.6906) and also MEEs and ETEs (rs = 0.6577). Lower but also significantly positive correlations between PGEs and total (rs = 0.5914), TEWDEF and total (rs = 0.5739), REEs and PGEs (rs = 0.5546) and also NNEs and PGEs (rs = 0.5509) were also calculated. No further significant correlations were observed, which suggests that accumulation of mainly MEEs, ETEs and TEWDEF in the studied mushroom species is not correlated with REEs, NNEs or PGEs.

Discussion

Interest in the mineral composition of fruit bodies of mushrooms, primarily edible, started in the 1970s and is ongoing. Hundreds of original papers on the topic have been published during the period. The main research results obtained during the individual phases have been collected in three reviews (Kalač and Svoboda 2000; Kalač 2010; Falandysz and Borovička 2013) and in a book (Kalač 2019). These publications collate data from over 700 original papers. The results given in this article will therefore be assessed in the light of the overall data collated chiefly in the book.

Element contents

As results from extensive data for several widely consumed and analysed wild-growing species (Kalač, 2019), contents of both major and particularly trace elements within a species vary widely, commonly in order of magnitude. Such variability is notably higher than that found in vegetables and other crops.

As early as the 1980s, great differences were reported in the uptake of individual metals from underlying substrates (Tyler 1982; Gast et al. 1988). Substrate composition and acidity are important factors. The ability to accumulate an element from substrate to a fruit body is expressed by the bioaccumulation (or transfer) factor, the ratio of an element content in a fruit body to its content in the underlying substrate, both values in dry weight. If the value is > 1, an element is bioaccumulated, at value < 1, it is bioexcluded. Cadmium, mercury and copper are known to be accumulated in fruit bodies, levels of zinc and manganese are comparable in fruit bodies and in the relevant substrate, while contents of lead and iron are lower in fruit bodies than in the substrates.

Mycelium of saprobic species (e.g. C. comatus, M. procera or P. gilva), taking up nutrients from organic matter, is generally located in the litter layers, usually at or very close to the substrate surface. On the contrary, mycelium of mycorrhizal species is dispersed in the mineral layers where roots of the host plant are growing, i.e. at lower horizons.

Age of fruit body and its size have been assessed of low importance for element contents. Nevertheless, a recent report of Falandysz et al. (2020) brings an amendatory view. Results from their study with Amanita muscaria show that the contents of nutritionally essential K, Mg, Mn, Ni, Co, Cu, Zn and Se in fruit bodies remained throughout all developmental stages, the contents of Pb, Sb, Tl, Ba, Sr, Li, Rb and Cs decreased with increasing maturity, whereas V, Cr, As, Ag, Cd and U remained at the same level, similarly to the essential elements.

The proportion of an element originating from atmospheric depositions seems to be limited due to the short lifetime of fruit bodies of most aboveground species. There is a hypothesis (Kalač 2010) that the increasing age of mycelium, up to decades in wild-growing species, and a protracted interval between fructifications considerably elevate the contents of many elements in fruit bodies. Moreover, as results from available data show, most individual elements are distributed unevenly in the fruit body. Higher levels generally occur in caps than in stipes (Kalač 2019). Nevertheless, the situation is not unambiguous as may be seen for mercury when considering all the available information. Overall, laboratory data with many reports on mercury in mushrooms argue for the general opinion (Falandysz et al. 2015). Alonso et al. (2000) and Árvay et al. (2015) reported a higher level of mercury in the spore-forming part (hymenophore) than in the rest of fruiting body while no statistically significant differences were observed Melgar et al. (2009). Therefore, in our study, complete fruit bodies, as usually consumed, were samples.

Sixty-three determined mineral elements were classified into six groups. Four of them were constituted from major and trace elements of established nutritional or toxicological properties, and a further two groups from trace elements of a similar chemical nature (REEs and PGEs). From the 17 analysed species, original data were obtained for L. cristata, L. personata, P. gilva and S. rugosoannulata and for many elements in the other species.

Typical contents of MEEs in edible mushrooms reported during 2010–2018 (overall Kalač 2019) were as follows: 50–750, < 10,000–35,000, < 500–1500, 50–750 and < 2500–> 10,000 mg kg−1 (all contents are expressed per dry weight) of Ca, K, Mg, Na and P, respectively. The results of Table 1 are thus within the ranges of available data. Among the 17 analysed species, saprobic C. comatus and P. gilva from different families showed the highest total content of MEEs due to high levels of both K and P.

The contents of eight of the ten determined essential trace elements (ETEs) (Table 3) are also within the usual ranges of available data (Kalač 2019) being < 1–20, < 10–75, < 50–> 1000, < 25–100, < 0.5–2, 0.5–10, < 0.5–10 and < 25–200 mg kg−1 for B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Mo, Ni, Se and Zn, respectively. M. procera is known to be a copper accumulator. The contents of Co and Cr, mostly below limits of detection, are lower than those given in the literature, < 0.2–5 and < 0.5–20 mg kg−1, respectively.

The usual ranges of literature data (Kalač 2019) for the elements of the TEWDEFs group are < 0.5–5, < 0.5–10, < 0.2–10, < 1–5, < 0.5–5 and < 1–5 mg kg−1 for Ag, As, Ba, Cd, Hg and Pb, respectively. A. arvensis has been known to accumulate silver, L. deliciosus arsenic and M. procera mercury and cadmium. Generally, our results in Table 4 are similar to those of the two preceding groups, within the reported ranges. A. arvensis accumulated Ag to the greatest extent followed by P. gilva, which also contained the highest level of Ba. L. deliciosus showed the highest contents of Cd and Pb, and M. procera proved its ability to accumulate Hg. There is very limited literature data for a Tl range between < 0.1 and 0.3 mg kg−1, contents above 1 mg kg−1 in five species are thus surprising. No less likely cause could be the origin of selected fruit bodies growing on soils enriched in V, because even in the vicinity of Poznań, the concentration of this metal in soils shows high point anomalies (Lis and Pasieczna 2005). Beryllium was detected in only three species. This accords with very limited available data reporting below 0.1 mg kg−1 (notably Seeger et al. 1984). No toxicological relevance of Be in the analysed species can be thus supposed.

Literature data for rare earth elements (REEs) have been scarce. The levels of individual REEs are commonly < 0.1 mg kg−1 and seldom exceed 1 mg kg−1. Cerium, La and Nd were reported to occur in the highest contents (Kalač 2019; Siwulski et al. 2020). As can be seen in the results from Table 5, a different order was observed: Pr > Nd > La > Ho. L. cristata and M. esculenta are species with the highest total level of the REEs. The observed results enhance the knowledge of REEs in mushrooms. Overall, the contents of potentially detrimental REEs in mushrooms are low. The dietary intake from mushroom meals thus seems to pose no health risk.

Nineteen nutritionally non-essential trace elements (NNEs) form a group with generally limited literature data, apart from Rb and Al. Nevertheless, the contents of Al can be overestimated if mushroom samples are polluted with soil residues. Usual reported contents (Kalač 2019) are < 25–> 500, < 0.75, < 25–500, < 5, < 3, < 10, < 2, < 2 and < 1 mg kg−1 for Al, Li, Rb, Sr, Te, Ti, U, V and Zr, respectively. The determined contents in Table 6 fit well with the available data. The level of Sr in M. esculenta and those of Te in A. arvensis, L. scabrum and L. aurantiacum somewhat surpass limited existing knowledge. Literature data for Bi, Ga, Ge, In, Re and Sc have been very scarce and the determined contents in Table 6 present a contribution to the knowledge of these elements in mushrooms. Indium contents are higher than those of other elements in this subgroup. The contents of Au, Hf, Sb and Th were, with only several exceptions, below the detection limits. Interest in health detrimental platinum group elements (PGEs), particularly Pt and Pd, has increased since their use as vehicular converters has spread them into the environment. Existing data for mushrooms have been entirely insufficient. Table 7 thus purveys original values. Platinum is the element with the highest level within the group with a mean value of 5.0 mg kg−1 and contents above 10 mg kg−1 in two edible species, M. esculenta and P. gilva. Likewise, Rh was detected in all the analysed species, however, at a lower level, up to 0.79 mg kg−1 in L. cristata. This species also had the highest contents of Ir, Os, Pd and Ru. Generally, Ru, Pd and Ir were detected in only 1–2 of the analysed species. Overall, all the determined element contents in this work range within levels available in the literature (Kalač 2019).

Role of species/family

There is a consensus that element contents in fruit bodies are species-dependent. Genus-dependence was sometimes stated, although with limited conclusiveness. Differences were observed even within a genus. A species of the genus Agaricus has been known to accumulate Cd, with a higher level of species yellowing (flavescentes) after mechanical damage of tissue (e.g. A. arvensis) than in those becoming red (rubescentes) (Andersen et al. 1982).

The accumulating ability of various families has been reported only to a limited extent. Pioneering works of the laboratory of Prof. Ruth Seeger from the University of Würzburg, Germany, should be underlined here. They analysed over 1000 samples of more than 400 edible, inedible and toxic species of numerous families and specified families with high and low abilities to accumulate four MEEs. However, the results were not then evaluated statistically. A low level of calcium was observed in the families Russulaceae and Lycoperdaceae (Seeger and Hüttner 1981). Potassium has been known as a quantitatively highly prevailing element in mushrooms. Seeger (1978) reported the highest contents in the former family Coprinaceae (recently Agaricaceae), including C. comatus. This species also showed the highest level of potassium within our set. The former family Coprinaceae was a high accumulator of magnesium, while the Boletaceae family was found to be the opposite ((Seeger and Beckert 1979). The data of Table 2 seem to confirm such a conclusion. Sodium was also accumulated mainly in the former family Coprinaceae (Seeger et al. 1983). Within our set, however, B. edulis contained significantly more sodium than C. comatus (463 and 286 mg kg−1, respectively).

Among trace elements, mercury was reported to be clearly species-dependent. Mercury-rich species were found particularly in Tricholomataceae, Amanitaceae and Lycoperdaceae, whereas rarely in Boletaceae, Amanitaceae and Russulaceae (Seeger 1976). However, later articles have reported high levels of mercury in B. edulis and B. pinophilus (Kalač 2010, 2019). M. procera from the family Agaricaceae, known as an Hg accumulator, contained noticeably the highest level among the tested species (Table 4).

According to available literature data, no further articles have reported mushroom families as determinants of mineral composition of fruit bodies. Nevertheless, consensus of species-dependency has developed on evidence based on a comparison of the element contents among various species. This article is the first to use recent statistical methods to assess the role of mushroom species/families in multielemental composition of fruit bodies.

PCA analysis allowed the high similarity in the content of elements belonging to particular groups to be shown (with the exception of MEEs) between species of the family Boletaceae (B. edulis, L. aurantiacum and L. scabrum), which may suggest that the mushroom family has a dominant role in the modification of the mineral composition of fruit bodies (Fig. 1). On the other hand, differences between mushroom species belonging to the family Agaricaceae observed for MEEs, ETEs and TEWDEF suggest that mushroom species may be a more important determinant of mineral composition of the fruit body. It is worth underlining that differences between species belonging to the same Tricholomataceae family were also observed (especially T. equestre in relation to the rest of the Tricholomataceae species as regards the content of MEEs and ETEs (Fig. 1a and b)), thus confirming the above-mentioned opinion.

As results from the heatmap (Fig. 2) show, from the five similarities mentioned in the “Similarities and differences between mushroom species” section, only one of them was between two species of the same family—B. edulis and L. scabrum (Boletaceae). Within seven dendrograms, only a low number of groups formed by species of the same family occur, namely L. nuda and P. gilva (Tricholomataceae) for MEEs and total elements (Fig. 3a, g), L. nuda and T. equestre (Tricholomataceae) for ETEs (Fig. 3b) and L. aurantiacum and L. scabrum (Boletaceae) for REEs (Fig. 3d). All other groups consist of species belonging to different families. All the described similarities/differences between species belonging to the same mushroom family are also partially confirmed by the sum rank (Fig. 4).

Overall, statistical evaluation of the comprehensive set of 63 mineral elements determined in 17 mushroom species belonging to 10 families revealed that the mineral contents in fruit bodies are primarily species-dependent, while family-dependency is of limited importance. The results thus endorse the rooted consensus.

Conclusion

Unfortunately, a simple answer to the question of which taxonomic unit is the more important determinant of the mineral composition of fruiting bodies of mushrooms is not possible. Acquiring a significant number of fruiting bodies of different species of fungi belonging to the same but different families, coming from different surfaces, made it possible to answer this question. It is certain that species belonging to the same family may exhibit higher, lower or differentiated accumulation of individual elements. However, due to the differences in the content of elements included in particular groups of elements, the selective accumulation of individual elements and the differences found for species belonging to the Agaricaceae and Tricholomataceae families, it can be said with a high degree of probability that a mushroom species but not the family to which it belongs is a more important determinant of the mineral composition of the fruit body. It should also be emphasised that perhaps even more extensive research and more samples could confirm our observations or even definitively answer the question.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the group of volunteers who helped in the collection of the studied material and the description of the sampling sites.

Funding information

This publication was financially supported by the framework of the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education program “Regional Initiative of Excellence” in 2019–2022, Project No. 005/RID/2018/19.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. Abdi H, Williams LJ (2010) Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat 2:433–459. 10.1002/wics.101 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alonso J, Salgado J, García MA, Melgar MJ (2000) Accumulation of mercury in edible macrofungi: influence of some factors. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 38:158–162. 10.1007/s002449910020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen A, Lykke S-E, Lange M, Bech K (1982) [Trace elements in edible mushrooms]. Publ. 68, Stat Levnedsmiddelinst Denmark, 29 pp. (in Danish)
  4. Árvay J, Tomáš J, Hauptvogel M, Massányi P, Harangozo Ľ, Tóth T, Stanovič R, Bryndzová Š, Bumbalová M (2015) Human exposure to heavy metals and possible public health risks via consumption of wild edible mushrooms from Slovak Paradise National Park, Slovakia. J Environ Sci Health B 50:833–843. 10.1080/03601234.2015.1058107 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Braeuer S, Goessler W, Kameník J, Konvalinková T, Žigová A, Borovička J (2018) Arsenic hyperaccumulation and speciation in the edible ink stain bolete (Cyanoboletus pulverulentus). Food Chem 242:225–231. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.09.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Campos JA, Tejera NA (2011) Bioconcentration factors and trace elements bioaccumulation in sporocarps of fungi collected from quartzite acidic soils. Biol Trace Elem Res 142:540–554. 10.1007/s12011-010-8853-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Falandysz J, Borovička J (2013) Macro and trace mineral constituents and radionuclides in mushrooms: health benefits and risks. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97:477–501. 10.1007/s00253012-4552-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Falandysz J, Drewnowska M (2015) Macro and trace elements in common chanterelle (Cantharellus cibarius) mushroom from the European background areas in Poland: composition, accumulation, dietary exposure and data review for species. J Environ Sci Health B 50:374–387. 10.1080/03601234.2015.1000190 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Falandysz J, Zhang J, Wang Y, Krasińska G, Kojta A, Saba M, Shen T, Li T, Liu H (2015) Evaluation of the mercury contamination in mushrooms of genus Leccinum from two different regions of the world: accumulation, distribution and probable dietary intake. Sci Total Environ 537:470–478. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.07.159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Falandysz J, Hanć A, Barałkiewicz D, Zhang J, Treu R (2020) Metallic and metalloid elements in various developmental stages of Amanita muscaria (L.) Lam. Fungal Biol 124:174–182. 10.1016/j.funbio.2020.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gast CH, Jansen E, Bierling J, Haanstra L (1988) Heavy metals in mushrooms and their relationship with soil characteristics. Chemosphere 17:789–799. 10.1016/0045-6535(88)90258-5 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kalač P (2010) Trace element contents in European species of wild growing edible mushrooms: a review for the period 2000-2009. Food Chem 122:2–15. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.02.045 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kalač P (2019) Mineral composition and radioactivity of edible mushrooms. Academic Press / Elsevier, ISBN 978-0-12-817565-1
  14. Kalač P, Svoboda L (2000) A review of trace element concentrations in edible mushrooms. Food Chem 69:273–281. 10.1016/S0308-8146(99)00264-2 [Google Scholar]
  15. Lis J, Pasieczna A (2005) Atlas geochemiczny Poznania i okolic. [Geochemical atlas of Poznań and surrounding area]. Państwowy Instytut Geologiczny, Warsaw [in Polish]
  16. Melgar MJ, Alonso J, García MA (2009) Mercury in edible mushrooms and underlying soils: bioconcentration factors and toxicological risk. Sci Total Environ 407:5328–5334. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.07.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Melgar MJ, Alonso J, García MA (2016) Cadmium in edible mushrooms from NW Spain: bioconcentration factors and consumer health implications. Food Chem Toxicol 88:13–20. 10.1016/j.fct.2015.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Morrison DF (1990) Multivariate statistical methods, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Co., New York [Google Scholar]
  19. Radulescu C, Stihi C, Busuioc G, Gheboianu AI, Popescu IV (2010) Studies concerning heavy metals bioaccumulation of wild edible mushrooms from industrial area by using spectrometric techniques. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 84:641–646. 10.1007/s00128-010-9976-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Rudawska M, Leski T (2005) Macro- and microelement contents in fruiting bodies of wild mushrooms from the Notecka forest in west-central Poland. Food Chem 92:499–506. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.08.017 [Google Scholar]
  21. Sácký J, Leonhardt T, Kotrba P (2016) Functional analysis of two genes coding for distinct cation diffusion facilitators of the ectomycorrhizal Zn-accumulating fungus Russula atropurpurea. Biometals 29:349–363. 10.1007/s10534-016-9920-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sarikurkcu C, Tepe B, Kocak MS, Uren MC (2015) Metal concentration and antioxidant activity of edible mushrooms from Turkey. Food Chem 175:549–555. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Seeger R (1976) Mercury content of mushrooms. Z Lebensm-Unters Forsch 160:303–312. 10.1007/BF01132296 (in German) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Seeger R (1978) The potassium content of mushrooms. Z Lebensm-Unters Forsch 167:23–31. 10.1007/BF01122881 (in German) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Seeger R, Beckert M (1979) Magnesium content of higher fungi. Z Lebensm-Unters Forsch 168:264–281. 10.1007/BF01122881 (in German) [Google Scholar]
  26. Seeger R, Hüttner W (1981) Calcium in mushrooms. Dtsch Lebensm-Rundsch 77:385–392 (in German) [Google Scholar]
  27. Seeger R, Trumpfheller S, Schweinshaut P (1983) On the occurrence of sodium in fungi. Dtsch Lebensm-Rundsch 79:80–87 (in German) [Google Scholar]
  28. Seeger R, Schleicher G, Schweinshaut P (1984) Investigation into the occurrence of beryllium in mushrooms. Dtsch Lebensm-Rundsch 80:178–186 (in German) [Google Scholar]
  29. Siwulski M, Budka A, Rzymski P, Mleczek P, Budzyńska S, Gąsecka M, Szostek M, Kalač P, Kuczyńska-Kippen N, Niedzielski P, Goliński P, Magdziak Z, Kaniuczak J, Mleczek M (2020) Multiannual monitoring (1974-2019) of rare earth elements in wild growing edible mushroom species in Polish forests. Chemosphere:127173. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127173 in press [DOI] [PubMed]
  30. Sun L, Chang W, Bao C, Zhuang Y (2017) Metal contents, bioaccumulation, and health risk assessment in wild edible Boletaceae mushrooms. J Food Sci 82:1500–1508. 10.1111/1750-3841.13698 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tyler G (1982) Accumulation and exclusion of metals in Collybia peronata and Amanita rubescens. Trans Br Mycol Soc 79:239–245. 10.1016/S0007-1536(82)80109-5 [Google Scholar]
  32. Zavastin DE, Biliută G, Dodi G, Macsim A-M, Lisa G, Gherman SP, Breabăn IG, Miron A, Coseri S (2018) Metal content and crude polysaccharide characterization of selected mushrooms growing in Romania. J Food Compos Anal 67:149–158. 10.1016/j.jfca.2018.01.011 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Environmental Science and Pollution Research International are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES