Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 18;28(1):246–261. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10395-x

Table 7.

System productivity, output energy, and input–output energy relationship influenced by cropping system, residue management, and TCE practices (2-year mean)

Treatment Input energy
(MJ ha−1)
Output energy
(MJ ha−1)
Net energy return
(MJ ha−1)
Energy ratio Energy productivity
(kg MJ−1)
Cropping system
Rice–wheat 97,844 351,253b 253,409b 4.04b 0.115b
Rice–maize 97,906 393,643a 295,737a 4.61a 0.139a
Residue management
Residue removal 63,211 356,469b 293,258a 5.72a 0.168a
Residue retention 132,539 388,427a 255,888b 2.93b 0.086b
TCE practice
CTTPR-CT 105,470 342,559d 237,089c 3.53c 0.104c
NPTPR-ZT 93,947 365,606c 271,658b 4.41b 0.128b
ZTTPR-ZT 94,198 384,498b 290,300a 4.70a 0.139a
ZTDSR-ZT 97,885 397,129a 299,243a 4.67a 0.137a

a–d different letters in continuous column are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05