Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;12(Suppl):1756191. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1756191

Table 2.

A summary of suggested research strands on “prevention of antibiotic resistance”

Research area Know-do gaps
Epidemiology and Surveillance
  • Explain differences in antibiotic usage and resistance across Europe in longitudinal cross-country studies.

  • Address the global divide between excessive use in well-to-do regions and inadequate access in poor regions.

  • Global surveillance and estimates lack valid data from LMICs.

  • Quantitative assessments need to be supplemented with qualitative and social research.

  • Assess changes in resistance following decreased drug consumption.

One Health – an interdisciplinary and intersectoral issue
  • Bridging is needed between biomedical, environmental, animal and social sciences.

  • Implementation research should address unused knowledge to be put into practice.

  • Closer collaboration and better documentation of antibiotic use across sectors are called for.

  • Address the economic forces behind infectious diseases and antibiotic resistance.

  • Better understanding and documentation of the irreversible consequences from not taking actions are needed.

  • ABR needs to become a high-profile social issue, like cancer, tobacco control and HIV/AIDS.

Understanding what drives AMR
  • Analyse the population impact of different drivers of antibiotic resistance.

  • Assessing the direct effects of antibiotic use on resistance need clinical studies on bacterial culture and colonization.

  • Assess relations between antibiotics prescribed in primary care and infections that require secondary care treatment.

  • Clarify the effects of antibiotic dose, duration and adherence on resistance.

  • For interpretation of intervention studies we need randomized studies with proper control groups.

Antimicrobial stewardship
  • Strengthen the evidence base for programmes in hospital settings through systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

  • Mixed evaluation models are needed supplementing quantitative methods with qualitative approaches.

  • Behavioural science is lacking in the development and evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes.

  • Account should be taken of the cultural and social norms around prescription and clinical practice.

  • Stewardship programmes outside hospital settings, e.g as community or public campaigns have not been assessed.

  • In view of the importance of context, information on stewardship programmes is generally lacking from LMICs.

  • Provide solid and generalizable data on cost and cost-effectiveness of hospital stewardship programmes.

Antibiotic resistance – a policy and health systems issue
  • Strengthen the evidence base for the effectiveness of the numerous policies across the human and animal sectors.

  • Stimulate the development of new antibiotics and evaluation of alternatives.

  • New business models are called for where public stakeholders involve private partners.

  • Prevention of ABR should be more visible in Agenda 2030 and more closely related to its SDGs.

  • Research comparable and in analogy with that regarding other global health threats should be encouraged.

  • Preserving antibiotic effectiveness ensuring universal access, is an ethical obligation warranting in-depth research.

  • Analogies with other global concerns can help us understand scope and consequences of no-action.

Health Care Practices and Guidelines
  • Knowledge is lacking about major variations in prescription rates between primary care practices.

  • Cyclic administration of antibiotics has been advocated for intensive care but is still subject to limited efficacy.

  • We lack complete evidence that combination therapy reduces ABR.

  • Research on ABR prevention needs to move beyond the laboratory to the community.

Preventive Strategies
  • We need to better understand how organizational structures and processes impact on preventive strategies and policy.

  • Address the tension between societal concerns and individual patients.

  • Advertisements in medical journals are an interesting venue for research on ABR communication.

What do people know?
  • How do people perceive of ABR in comparison with other global threats?

  • How do people in different ages and cultures cope with antibiotic resistance?

  • How do people look upon the responsibilities for change for the individual versus society?

  • KAP surveys on ABR need improvement through stronger theoretical frameworks.

What do prescribers know?
  • Communication research on the dialogue between the patient and the doctor should be stimulated.

  • Synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies may enable more in-depth explanations of knowledge and beliefs.

  • Interventions are called for to improve prescribing behavior and rebuild patient-physician trust.

  • Qualitative research could address how social norms and standards of care can influence prescribing behaviour.

Alternatives to antibiotics
  • Establish the probiotic strains and doses that provide the best results and safety in immunocompromised patients.

  • Assess efficacy and potential side effects of probiotics as a means of reducing the emergence of resistance.

  • Assess evidence favouring the effectiveness of probiotics through larger, randomized and double-blind studies.

  • Undertake proper safety studies including documentation of dosing and types of microbes.