Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 4;7(1):e001485. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001485

Table 2.

Prevalence of TMD, TMD pain, DJD and mandibular movement capacity in the study sample


ERA group (n=50) At-risk group (n=50) Control group (n=50) Test statistics P value
Diagnosis according to DC/TMD
TMD diagnosis* (n (%)) 20 (40) 19 (38) 14 (28) χ2= 1.604*, 1.131† 0.205‡§, 0.288¶§
TMD-pain diagnosis† (n (%)) 7 (14) 8 (16) 2 (4) χ2= 4.000† 0.16‡ ** 0.046¶§
DJD diagnosis (n (%)) 6 (12) 2 (4) 2 (4) 0.269‡ ** 1.0¶ **
Bruxism
Probable sleep bruxism (n (%)) 9 (18) 14 (28) 11 (22) 0.485§
Mandibular movement capacity
Maximum mouth opening, mm (mean (SD)) 49.1±7.2 51.4±5.2 50.7±6.3 F=1.815 0.167††
Maximum protrusion, mm (mean (SD)) 8.5±2.1 7.8±2.5 8.2±2.8 F=0.836 0.436††
Maximum laterotrusion, mm (mean (SD)) 10.6±2.3 10.7±2.4 9.9±3.0 F=1.332 0.267††

Significant p-values are presented in bold writing.

*Myalgia, arthralgia, disc displacement, DJD and/or headache attributed to TMD.

†Myalgia and/or arthralgia.

‡ERA group versus control group.

§χ2 test.

¶At-risk group versus control group.

**Fisher's exact test.

††One-way ANOVA (F).

ANOVA, analysis of variance; DC, diagnostic criteria; DJD, degenerative joint disease; ERA, early rheumatoid arthritis; n, number of observations; TMD, temporomandibular disorders.