Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 1;10(12):4547–4560.

Table 3.

Factors associated with overall survival in 87 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Character Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age (year) 0.998 (0.970-1.026) .872
Sex Female vs male 2.163 (0.659-7.105) .203
Alcohol No vs yes 1.347 (0.710-2.556) .362
HBV No vs yes 0.614 (0.342-1.105) .104
HCV No vs yes 1.053 (0.533-2.081) .882
Grade 1-2 irAEs Yes vs no 2.419 (1.157-5.055) .019 2.217 (1.005-4.892) .049
Grade ≥3 irAEs Yes vs no 1.290 (0.573-2.905) .539
TTV (cm3) ≤1000 vs >1000 3.511 (1.858-6.633) <.001
Tumor number Single vs multiple 3.144 (1.234-8.012) .016
MVI No vs yes 2.806 (1.443-5.458) .002
EHM No vs yes 1.614 (0.855-3.049) .140
CLIP score 0-2 vs ≥3 6.146 (3.042-12.418) <.001 3.717 (1.537-8.988) .004
AFP (ng/mL) <400 vs ≥400 1.605 (0.878-2.935) .124
NLR ≤3.0 vs >3.0 14.533 (1.993-105.976) .008
AST (U/L) ≤40 vs >40 1.633 (0.687-3.885) .267
ALT (U/L) ≤40 vs >40 2.080 (1.086-3.985) .027
Child-Pugh class A vs B/C 2.886 (1.556-5.355) .001
ALBI grade 1 vs 2/3 4.202 (1.492-11.840) .007
Prior therapy
    Sorafenib No vs yes 0.852 (0.475-1.528) .591
    Lenvatinib No vs yes 1.170 (0.491-2.788) .723
Concurrent therapy No vs yes 0.399 (0.222-0.716) .002
    TKI No vs yes 0.635 (0.353-1.143) .130
    TACE No vs yes 0.197 (0.047-0.818) .025
    RT No vs yes 1.383 (0.543-3.518) .496
AFP response Yes vs No 1.872 (0.880-3.796) .106
Best response CR + PR vs none 4.935 (1.749-13.920) .003

AFP, α-fetoprotein; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CLIP, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program; CR + PR, complete response plus partial response; EHM, extrahepatic metastasis; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; irAEs, immune-related adverse events; MVI, macroscopic vascular invasion; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; RT, radiotherapy; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; TTV, total tumor volume.