Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 1;10(12):4547–4560.

Table 4.

Factors associated with overall survival in 62 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent evaluable radiological imaging

Character Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Age (year) 0.985 (0.947-1.024) .452
Sex Female vs male 2.171 (0.497-9.479) .303
Alcohol No vs yes 1.237 (0.505-3.032) .642
HBV No vs yes 0.754 (0.338-1.679) .489
HCV No vs yes 0.891 (0.333-2.380) .817
Grade 1-2 irAEs No vs yes 1.786 (0.737-4.331) .199
Grade ≥3 irAEs Yes vs no 1.005 (0.373-2.710) .992
TTV (cm3) ≤1000 vs >1000 3.500 (1.545-7.929) .003
Tumor number Single vs multiple 3.355 (0.996-11.302) .051
MVI No vs yes 3.222 (1.343-7.733) .009
EHM No vs yes 1.020 (0.451-2.304) .962
CLIP score 0-2 vs ≥3 4.333 (1.811-10.367) .001 3.257 (1.349-7.866) .009
AFP (ng/mL) <400 vs ≥400 1.721 (0.779-3.800) .179
NLR ≤3.0 vs >3.0 9.543 (1.282-71.038) .028
AST (U/L) ≤40 vs >40 1.354 (0.456-4.014) .585
ALT (U/L) ≤40 vs >40 2.571 (1.066-6.204) .036
Child-Pugh class A vs B/C 2.152 (0.960-4.826) .063
ALBI grade 1 vs 2/3 11.028 (1.476-82.406) .019
Prior therapy
    Sorafenib No vs yes 1.476 (0.672-3.241) .332
    Lenvatinib No vs yes 2.059 (0.808-5.2247) .130
Concurrent therapy No vs yes 0.611 (0.270-1.383) .237
    TKI No vs yes 0.730 (0.336-1.585) .426
    TACE No vs yes 0.302 (0.071-1.295) .107
    RT No vs yes 1.515 (0.486-4.721) .473
AFP response Yes vs no 1.369 (0.600-3.124) .455
Best response CR + PR vs none 3.402 (1.160-9.982) .026

AFP, α-fetoprotein; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CLIP, Cancer of the Liver Italian Program; CR + PR, complete response plus partial response; EHM, extrahepatic metastasis; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; irAEs, immune-related adverse events; MVI, macroscopic vascular invasion; NLR, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio; RT, radiotherapy; TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; TTV, total tumor volume.