Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 1;10(12):4386–4398.

Table 2.

Clinicopathologic features of bladder tumors in men who received α1-blocker therapy

Silodosin Tamsulosin Naftopidil P value

Sil vs. Tam Sil vs. Naf Sil vs. Tam+Naf Tam vs. Naf
Bladder tumors 49/540 (9.1%) 64/523 (12.2%) 28/236 (11.9%) 0.094 0.232 0.082 0.884
Age (mean ± SD, yr) 74.3 ± 7.9 75.6 ± 9.9 71.8 ± 8.0 0.426 0.196 0.904 0.055
Tumor grade 0.418 0.188 0.257 0.488
    Low grade 32 (65.3%) 37 (57.8%) 14 (50.0%)
    High grade 17 (34.7%) 27 (42.2%) 14 (50.0%)
Tumor stage 0.330 0.397 0.300 0.977
    NMI (≤pT1) 45 (91.8%) 55 (85.9%) 24 (85.7%)
    MI (≥pT2) 4 (8.2%) 9 (14.1%) 4 (14.3%)
Recurrence of NMI 16 (35.6%) 27 (49.1%) 12 (50.0%) 0.174 0.245 0.137 0.941
Progression of NMI 1 (2.2%) 6 (10.9%) 5 (20.8%) 0.090 0.009 0.034 0.241
Progression of MI 0 (0%) 7 (77.8%) 2 (50.0%) 0.009 0.103 0.015 0.317

Sil: silodosin; Tam: tamsulosin; Naf: naftopidil; NMI: non-muscle-invasive; MI: muscle-invasive.