Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;44(1):188–193. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1714

Table 3.

Multivariable analyses, MetS vs. non-MetS

Outcomes MetS (n = 188) Non-MetS (n = 99) Risk difference, % (95% CI) Adjusted ORa (95% CI) P value
Hospital mortality, n (%) 48 (25.5) 10 (10.1) 15.4 (6.8–24.0) 3.42 (1.52–7.69) 0.0030
ICU requirement, n (%) 106 (56.4) 24 (24.2) 32.1 (21.1, 43.2) 4.59 (2.53–8.32) <0.0001
ARDSb, n (%) 69 (36.7) 11 (11.1) 25.6 (16.3–34.9) 4.70 (2.25–9.82) <0.0001
IMV, n (%) 90 (47.9) 18 (18.2) 29.7 (19.3–40.1) 4.71 (2.50–8.87) <0.0001
LOS, mean ± SD, days 14.1 ± 10.6 10.7 ± 10.1 n/a n/a 0.0097
LOS, median (IQR), days 11 (7.0–20.5) 7 (4.0–14.0) n/a n/a 0.0062
Hospital readmission,c n (%) 16/140 (11.4) 6/89 (6.7) 4.7 (−1.7 to 12.1) 1.19 (0.40–3.61) 0.7533

n/a, not available.

a

Multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age, sex, race, hospital site, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

b

ARDS defined according to Berlin criteria.

c

Hospital readmission data were available only for case subjects who survived to discharge.