Abstract
Background
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Currently, the overall survival rate of GC is still unsatisfactory despite progress in diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, studying the molecular mechanisms involved in GC is vital for diagnosis and treatment. CircRNAs, a type of noncoding RNA, have been proven to act as miRNA sponges that can widely regulate various cancers. By this mechanism, circRNA can regulate tumors at the genetic level by releasing miRNA from inhibiting its target genes. The WNT2/β-Catenin regulatory pathway is one of the canonical signaling pathways in tumors. It can not only promote the development of tumors but also provide energy for tumor growth through cell metabolism (such as glutamine metabolism).
Methods
Through RNA sequencing, we found that hsa_circ_0008259 (circLMO7) was highly expressed in GC tissues. After verifying the circular characteristics of circLMO7, we determined the downstream miRNA (miR-30a-3p) of circLMO7 by RNA pull-down and luciferase reporter assays. We verified the effect of circLMO7 and miR-30a-3p on GC cells through a series of functional experiments, including colony formation, 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine and Transwell assays. Through Western blot and immunofluorescence analyses, we found that WNT2 was the downstream target gene of miR-30a-3p and further confirmed that the circLMO7-miR-30a-3p-WNT2 axis could promote the development of GC. In addition, measurement of related metabolites confirmed that this axis could also provide energy for the growth of GC cells through glutamine metabolism. We found that circLMO7 could promote the growth and metastasis of GC in vivo by the establishment of nude mouse models. Finally, we also demonstrated that HNRNPL could bind to the flanking introns of the circLMO7 exons to promote circLMO7 cyclization.
Results
CircLMO7 acted as a miR-30a-3p sponge affecting the WNT2/β-Catenin pathway to promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells. Moreover, animal results also showed that circLMO7 could promote GC growth and metastasis in vivo. CircLMO7 could also affect the glutamine metabolism of GC cells through the WNT2/β-Catenin pathway to promote its malignant biological function. In addition, we proved that HNRNPL could promote the self-cyclization of circLMO7.
Conclusions
CircLMO7 promotes the development of GC by releasing the inhibitory effect of miR-30a-3p on its target gene WNT2.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-020-01791-9.
Keywords: Gastric cancer, circRNA, miRNA, WNT2, Glutaminolysis, HNRNPL
Background
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide. As of 2018, the global incidence of GC ranks fifth among all cancers, while its mortality ranks third [1]. The 5-year survival rate of GC is not satisfactory. From 2005 to 2009, the 5-year survival rate of GC in China was only 31% [2]. The traditional diagnosis of GC is endoscopy and pathology [3]. However, the 5-year survival rate of GC patients is not high because the cancer has already metastasized at the time of diagnosis [4]. Therefore, further research on the molecular mechanisms involved in GC is extremely important for the early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of tumors.
Circular RNA (circRNA) is a class of noncoding RNA molecules connected end-to-end in a covalently closed loop structure [5]. Currently, circRNAs are known to be widely present in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells and are highly conserved during species evolution [6, 7]. The formation of circRNA is closely related to the reverse splicing of its precursor mRNA (pre-mRNA) [8, 9]. The vast majority of circRNAs are generated by exon circularization, while some are circularized by introns, and few are composed of exons and introns together [10]. Compared with traditional linear RNA, circRNA does not have a 5′ cap or a 3′ poly(A) tail structure. This structural feature makes it more stable and difficult to degrade by exonuclease [11]. In recent years, circRNAs have been reported to play an increasingly important role in the study of new tumor biomarkers due to these superior characteristics [10]. The role of circRNAs in tumorigenesis and development is mainly summarized as follows. CircRNA can be used as competitive endogenous RNA (ceRNA) to regulate microRNA (miRNA) [12–16]. CircRNA can also bind to RNA-binding protein (RBP) to affect the biological malignancy of tumors [5]. Interestingly, some RBPs can also bind to the flanking introns of related pre-mRNA exons and affect the formation of circRNAs [17]. Some circRNAs can act as transcription regulators [18]. In addition, very few circRNAs can directly encode polypeptides [19].
With in-depth studies of the mechanism of tumorigenesis, it has been reported that glutamine metabolism is one of the most important metabolic modes in cancer and that some circRNAs can promote the development of cancer through it [20]. For example, circHECTD1 and circHMGCS1 can promote the development of GC and hepatoblastoma by glutamine decomposition, respectively [21, 22]. With the catalysis of glutaminase (GLS), glutamine (GLN) can be converted into glutamate (GLU), which is then converted into α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) by glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) to participate in the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA cycle) and provide energy for tumor growth [20, 23]. In addition, glutamate, together with cysteine and glycine, can produce glutathione (GSH), which neutralizes peroxy radicals to maintain reactive oxygen species (ROS) stress balance and reduce tumor cell damage caused by oxidative stress [24, 25].
In this study, we confirmed that circLMO7 can absorb miR-30a-3p to affect the WNT2/β-Catenin pathway to promote the development of GC. Moreover, circLMO7 can also promote the glutamine metabolism of GC cells through the WNT2/β-Catenin pathway to provide energy for tumor growth. In addition, HNRNPL can bind to the flanking introns of the circLMO7 exon, thereby promoting the self-cyclization of circLMO7. In short, the study of circLMO7 as a new biomarker and a potential target for GC treatment is very promising.
Supplementary materials and methods
All the materials and methods are included in the Supplementary Materials and Methods section.
Results
Differentially expressed circRNAs in GC were detected by NGS
We performed NGS in the absence of ribosomal RNA on GC tissues and adjacent normal tissues from three people. Sequencing results showed that a total of 450 circRNAs were differentially expressed, of which 314 circRNAs were upregulated and 136 circRNAs were downregulated. Based on the volcano map and cluster heat map of the sequencing data, a significantly upregulated circRNA (chr13: 76287318–76,335,174, hsa_circ_0008259, referred to as circLMO7) aroused our interest (Fig. 1a, b). To further verify the expression of circLMO7 in GC tissues, we performed qRT-PCR on 40 paired tissues. The results showed that the expression of circLMO7 in GC tissues was significantly higher than that in adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1c). This result was consistent with the NGS analysis. Next, we verified the expression of circLMO7 in cell lines, and the results suggested that the expression of circLMO7 in HGC-27, SGC-7901, MGC-803, BGC-823 and MKN-45 cells was significantly increased relative to that in GES-1 cells. Among these cell line, BGC-823 cells had the highest expression, followed by SGC-7901 cells (Fig. 1d). Therefore, we selected BGC-823 and SGC-7901 cells to study the regulatory pathway of circLMO7. Next, by Sanger sequencing, we found that circLMO7 originated from the LMO7 gene on human chromosome 13. This circRNA was formed by exons 3, 4, and 5 (76287318–76,335,174) of the gene from end to end, and the loop site of circLMO7 is indicated in the sequencing results (Supplementary Fig. 1A). RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) further confirmed the presence of circLMO7 (Supplementary Fig. 1B). To verify the circularity of circLMO7, we treated total RNA of GC cells with RNase R and then performed qRT-PCR with divergent and convergent primers. The results showed that circLMO7 was significantly less susceptible to RNase R digestion than linear LMO7 (Supplementary Fig. 1C). Next, we performed agarose gel electrophoresis on the qRT-PCR products. The results showed that the qRT-PCR products without RNase R treatment contained amplified sequences corresponding to circLMO7 and linear LMO7. However, the qRT-PCR products with RNase R treatment only contained the amplified sequence corresponding to circLMO7. In addition, the genomic DNA (gDNA) qRT-PCR products only contained the amplified sequence corresponding to linear LMO7, which was determined by the positional characteristics of circLMO7 and linear LMO7 (Supplementary Fig. 1D). Moreover, the actinomycin D inhibition test also proved that circLMO7 was more stable than linear LMO7 (Supplementary Fig. 1E). In summary, we found that circLMO7 was significantly more stable than linear LMO7. The expression of circLMO7 could also affect the clinicopathological characteristics of GC. We divided the 40 patients into a high expression group and a low expression group according to the median expression of circLMO7 in GC tissues. The analysis showed that the expression of circLMO7 was closely related to the T grade and stage of GC. However, circLMO7 expression was not associated with the gender, lymphatic invasion, size, tumor site or Lauren classification of GC (Table 1). Collectively, the results showed that circLMO7 has a stable circular structure and certain effects on the clinicopathological characteristics of GC.
Table 1.
Parameters | Group | CircLMO7 expression | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases | Low | High | P-value | ||
Gender | Male | 21 | 10 | 11 | 0.752 |
Female | 19 | 10 | 9 | ||
T grade | T1 + T2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0.008** |
T3 + T4 | 33 | 13 | 20 | ||
Lymphatic invasion | Negative(N0) | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0.342 |
Positive(N1-N3) | 35 | 16 | 19 | ||
Stage | I-II | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0.020* |
III-IV | 31 | 12 | 19 | ||
Size(cm) | < 3 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1.000 |
≥3 | 30 | 15 | 15 | ||
Tumor site | Cardiac | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0.605 |
Non-cardiac | 36 | 17 | 19 | ||
Lauren classification | Intestinal type carcinoma | 9 | 5 | 4 | 1.000 |
Non-Intestinal type carcinoma | 31 | 15 | 16 |
p < 0.05 represents statistical significance (Chi-square test)
CircLMO7 acts as a sponge of miR-30a-3p
Next, we explored the sponge function of circLMO7 and miRNA. By using TargetScan7.2 (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/) and RegRNA2.0 (http://regrna2.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/detection.html) to predict the target miRNA of circLMO7, we found that circLMO7 can bind to 488 and 31 potential miRNAs based on TargetScan7.2 and RegRNA2.0, respectively. After the results of the two databases were combined, 11 overlapping miRNAs were identified (Fig. 2a), namely, miR-320c, miR-103a-2-5p, miR-30e-3p, miR-21-3p, miR-320d, miR-3688-3p, miR-3591-3p, miR-30a-3p, miR-320b, miR-320a, and miR-4429 (Fig. 2b). Next, we verified the ability of circLMO7 to bind to these 11 miRNAs by RNA pull-down experiments. First, we measured the pull-down efficiency of the circLMO7 probe in SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells by qRT-PCR. The results showed that the efficiency of the circLMO7 probe was significantly higher than that of the oligo probe (Fig. 2c). We then performed RNA pull-down and used qRT-PCR to detect the expression of the 11 miRNAs in the pull-down products. We found that miR-30a-3p had the highest expression level in both SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells, which suggested the highest binding efficiency (Fig. 2d). In addition, we identified two binding sites between circLMO7 and miR-30a-3p according to RegRNA2.0 (Fig. 2e). Next, the luciferase reporter assay was used to further verify the predicted binding. We constructed a circLMO7 luciferase reporter vector and its mutants and then carried out the experiment (Fig. 2f). The results demonstrated that cotransfection of wild-type circLMO7 with miR-30a-3p mimics caused a significant decrease in luciferase activity, while cotransfecting mutant circLMO7 (in which one of the binding sites or both binding sites were mutated) and miR-30a-3p mimics did not have the same effect (Fig. 2g), indicating the binding between circLMO7 and miR-30a-3p. In addition, RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization confirmed the colocalization of circLMO7 and miR-30a-3p in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2h). To further explore whether there was a quantitative relationship between circLMO7 and miR-30a-3p, we measured the expression of miR-30a-3p in the 40 paired tissues by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2i) and analyzed its correlation with circLMO7. The results showed that the expression levels of circLMO7 and miR-30a-3p were negatively correlated in GC tissues (Fig. 2j). In summary, circLMO7 can bind to miR-30a-3p as a sponge and is negatively correlated with miR-30a-3p.
Overexpression of circLMO7 or knockdown of miR-30a-3p promotes the proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells
To further explore the underlying functions of circLMO7 and miR-30a-3p in the development of GC, we constructed small interfering RNAs specific to circLMO7 (si-circLMO7), a plasmid overexpressing circLMO7 (ov-circLMO7), miR-30a-3p mimics (mi-miR-30a-3p), and a miR-30a-3p inhibitor (in-miR-30a-3p). We transfected these oligonucleotide sequences into SGC-7901 and BGC-823 cells and first verified that si-circLMO7 and ov-circLMO7 could silence and amplify circLMO7, respectively, before performing functional experiments. Transfection of these reagents only affected circLMO7 and not the linear form (Supplementary Fig. 2A, B). In addition, the effects of mi-miR-30a-3p and in-miR-30a-3p were also confirmed (Supplementary Fig. 2C). Next, we used colony formation, 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) and Transwell assays to determine the proliferation, migration and invasion ability of GC cells, respectively. The assay results showed that overexpression of circLMO7 or knockdown of miR-30a-3p could promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells in vitro. In contrast, knocking down circLMO7 or overexpressing miR-30a-3p showed the opposite results (Fig. 3a-c). In recent years, human organoids have become a hot topic in tumor research because they simulate the real human environment [26–28]. We found that overexpressing circLMO7 or knocking down miR-30a-3p could promote the growth of human GC organoids. Accordingly, knocking down circLMO7 or overexpressing miR-30a-3p showed the opposite results (Fig. 3d). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) refers to the process by which epithelial cells transform into mesenchymal cells, which promotes the migration and invasion of cancer cells [29–31]. Western blotting confirmed that when overexpressing circLMO7 or knocking down miR-30a-3p, the mesenchymal cell marker N-cadherin was upregulated and the epithelial cell marker E-cadherin was downregulated (Fig. 3e), while knocking down circLMO7 or overexpressing miR-30a-3p showed the opposite results. This indicated that overexpression of circLMO7 or knockdown of miR-30a-3p can promote the migration and invasion of GC cells by promoting the EMT process.
CircLMO7 promotes the expression of WNT2 and circLMO7 promotes the development of GC through the circLMO7-miR-30a-3p-WNT2 axis
In the classical ceRNA mechanism, circRNA can relieve the inhibitory effect of miRNA on its target gene, thereby increasing the gene expression level. Therefore, we investigated the downstream target genes of miR-30a-3p. With the help of TargetScan7.2 (http://www.targetscan.org/vert_72/) and miRWalk3 (http://mirwalk.umm.uni-heidelberg.de/), we discovered the potential target gene WNT2 (Fig. 4a). WNT2 is an evolutionarily conserved secreted glycoprotein. It has been reported that WNT2 can promote the progression of GC [32–34]. Therefore, we hypothesized that WNT2 might be related to the circLMO7-miR-30a-3p axis and play a promoting role in tumor development. To validate the above hypothesis, we first verified the relationship between miR-30a-3p and WNT2 expression by Western blotting. The expression of WNT2 increased significantly after inhibition of miR-30a-3p. When miR-30a-3p was overexpressed, the opposite result was obtained (Fig. 4b). Next, we searched for the binding sites between miR-30a-3p and WNT2 (Fig. 4c) in TargetScan7.2 and verified the predicted sites with the luciferase reporter assay. The results showed that cotransfection of wild-type WNT2 and miR-30a-3p mimics caused a decrease in luciferase activity, while cotransfection of mutant WNT2 and miR-30a-3p mimics did not (Fig. 4d). Based on the above results, we confirmed that miR-30a-3p can bind to WNT2 and negatively regulate WNT2. Next, we found that WNT2 was highly expressed in GC tissues by immunohistochemical analysis and the TCGA database (https://www.cancer.gov/about-nci/organization/ccg/research/structural-genomics/tcga) (Fig. 4f, g). Moreover, the KmPlot database (http://kmplot.com/analysis/index.php?p=service) also showed that a higher WNT2 expression level was positively correlated with worse patient prognosis (Fig. 4e). The qRT-PCR data obtained for WNT2 in the 40 patients were consistent with the previous result (Fig. 4h). Next, we performed a linear correlation analysis between the expression levels of WNT2 and circLMO7, which indicated that they were positively correlated (Fig. 4i). Additionally, we confirmed the relationship between circLMO7 and WNT2 expression through immunofluorescence analysis (Fig. 4j). Here, we hypothesized that circLMO7 sponges miR-30a-3p to regulate WNT2, eventually promoting the development of GC. To confirm this hypothesis, we conducted rescue experiments. The results of the colony formation and EdU assays showed that the inhibitory effect of si-circLMO7 on GC cell proliferation was rescued after cotransfection with in-miR-30a-3p (Supplementary Fig. 3A, B). Moreover, the human GC organoids experiment showed the same results (Supplementary Fig. 3E). In addition, based on scratch assay, Transwell assay and Western blotting, we found that the inhibitory effect of si-circLMO7 on GC cell migration and invasion could be rescued after cotransfection with in-miR-30a-3p (Supplementary Fig. 3C, D, F). Next, we verified the expression levels of the target gene WNT2 and its downstream proteins, such as β-catenin, phosphorylated β-catenin (p-β-catenin) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9). The results showed that the expression levels of these proteins were decreased when si-circLMO7 was transfected, but they were rescued after cotransfection with in-miR-30a-3p (Supplementary Fig. 3F). Therefore, we validated that si-circLMO7 inhibited GC cell proliferation, migration and invasion accompanied by decreased expression levels of WNT2 and its downstream proteins. The results were rescued when the cells were cotransfected with in-miR-30a-3p. In summary, circLMO7 can promote the development of GC through the circLMO7-miR-30a-3p-WNT2 axis.
CircLMO7 can promote the growth and metastasis of GC in vivo
Next, we further validated the cancer-promoting role of circLMO7 in GC by constructing a series of models in vivo. We randomly divided 36 BALB/c nude mice into three groups to construct xenograft tumor models. All nude mice were sacrificed after 4 weeks, and the weight and volume of xenograft tumors were measured (V = length×width2 × 0.5). The results showed that overexpression of circLMO7 significantly promoted the growth of xenograft tumors, while knocking down circLMO7 suppressed tumor growth (Fig. 5a). The weight and volume of xenograft tumors reflected this obvious difference (Fig. 5b). In addition, to verify the effect of circLMO7 on GC metastasis, we constructed lung metastasis models in 18 BALB/c nude mice. Four weeks after injecting 1 × 106 cells into the tail vein of each mouse, the metastasis of lungs in nude mice was detected by IVIS. The results showed that overexpression of circLMO7 significantly promoted lung metastasis in nude mice, while knocking down circLMO7 reversed this effect (Fig. 5c). In addition, hematoxylin-eosin staining of the lung metastasis tissues suggested that the size of the tumor tissue was consistent with the above results (Fig. 5d). Overall, circLMO7 can promote the growth and metastasis of GC in vivo.
CircLMO7 promotes GC malignant biological functions through glutamine metabolism
Glutamine metabolism is one of the important metabolic modes of tumors. It has been reported that the WNT/β-catenin pathway can promote the malignant biological functions of tumors through glutamine metabolism [35, 36]. In the above section, we found that the circLMO7-miR-30a-3p-WNT2 axis can promote the development of GC. Therefore, we next wanted to explore whether this axis could also regulate glutamine metabolism to participate in GC development. Through circRNA-miRNA-mRNA pathway analysis, we found that the circLMO7-miR-30a-3p-WNT2 axis was closely related to glutamine metabolism (Supplementary Fig. 4). With the help of TCGA database, we found that GLS, a key enzyme for glutamine metabolism, was highly expressed in GC tissues (Fig. 6a). The qRT-PCR data on GLS expression in 40 patients was consistent with the TCGA database findings (Fig. 6b). Linear correlation analysis and Western blotting showed that circLMO7 was positively correlated with GLS (Fig. 6c, d). These results suggested that circLMO7 can regulate the expression level of GLS. Then, we found that overexpression of circLMO7 maintained the glutamine metabolism pathway in a highly active state by promoting the raw material GLN and the key enzyme GLS, as well as the expression of the intermediate metabolites GLU and α-KG. However, when circLMO7 was knocked down, the activity of the glutamine metabolism pathway was blocked (Fig. 6e-h). Next, colony formation and EdU assays showed that si-GLS rescued the promoting effect of ov-circLMO7 on GC cell proliferation (Fig. 6i, j). Transwell assays showed that the promoting effect of ov-circLMO7 on GC cell migration and invasion was also rescued after cotransfection with si-GLS (Fig. 6k). In addition, we found that overexpression of circLMO7 could inhibit the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), but si-GLS rescued this effect as well (Fig. 6l). In summary, circLMO7 can promote the malignant biological functions of GC through glutamine metabolism.
HNRNPL promotes the production of circLMO7 in GC
Most circRNAs are circularized by exons, and this process is affected by many factors. It has been reported that some RBPs can interact with the flanking introns of exons to induce exon circularization, which promotes the production of corresponding circRNAs [37, 38]. Such RBPs are HNRNPL, QKI, E2F1, EIF4A3, etc. [39–41]. This prompted us to investigate the formation of circLMO7. We investigated the above RBPs through RBPmap analysis (http://rbpmap.technion.ac.il/index.html) and found that HNRNPL had the highest binding efficiency with the flanking introns of the circLMO7 exons. Heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein L (HNRNPL) is a common RBP and has been reported to bind the specific flanking introns of exons to enhance the production of circRNA [39]. From the RBPmap analysis, we found that the flanking introns of circLMO7 exons had 4 binding sites with HNRNPL (Fig. 7a). Two of them were located in the second intron, which were named I2HB (intron 2 HNRNPL binding sequence). The other two were located in the fifth intron and were named I5HB (intron 5 HNRNPL binding sequence). Next, we verified the binding relationship between HNRNPL and the flanking introns by RNA pull-down and RNA immunoprecipitation assays (Fig. 7b, c). After that, we constructed a mutant plasmid and wild-type plasmid to verify the correlation between circLMO7 and I2HB & I5HB (Fig. 7d). qRT-PCR showed that only the wild-type plasmid could significantly upregulate the expression of circLMO7, while the mutant plasmids (I2HB/I5HB was mutated or both were mutated) did not have an effect (Fig. 7e). The results indicated that both I2HB and I5HB were indispensable for the production of circLMO7. Next, we investigated whether HNRNPL can regulate the production of circLMO7 at the posttranscriptional level. We found that when HNRNPL was knocked down, the expression of circLMO7 was significantly reduced, while the expression of pre-mLMO7 was not significantly changed (Fig. 7f). Combined with the results mentioned above, it was clear that HNRNPL affected the production of circLMO7 by interacting with its binding motif. In addition, we found that HNRNPL was highly expressed in GC tissues by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 7g), which was consistent with the TCGA database results (Fig. 7h). Moreover, qRT-PCR verified that HNRNPL was highly expressed in GC tissues (Fig. 7i), and the linear correlation analysis suggested that the expression levels of HNRNPL and circLMO7 were positively correlated (Fig. 7j). In summary, HNRNPL can bind to flanking introns of circLMO7 exons to promote its production.
Discussion
In this study, we used NGS to identify a potential target circRNA (circLMO7) that is significantly upregulated in GC tissues. We verified the existence and circular characteristics of circLMO7 by Sanger sequencing and predicted its downstream miRNA (miR-30a-3p) through bioinformatics analysis. Through RNA pull-down and luciferase reporter assays, we found that circLMO7 and miR-30a-3p could bind to each other. Functional assays showed that circLMO7 could promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells. However, miR-30a-3p inhibited the above cell processes. Next, WNT2, a secreted glycoprotein, was predicted to be a potential target gene of miR-30a-3p by bioinformatics analysis. It has been reported that WNT2 can promote the development of tumors [42–44], and the WNT2/β-Catenin signaling pathway is related to the malignant biological functions of GC [45–47]. This protein drew our attention. We confirmed that miR-30a-3p could bind to WNT2 and found that circLMO7 promoted the development of GC through the circLMO7-miR-30a-3p-WNT2 axis. We also found that circLMO7 promoted GC growth and metastasis in vivo through animal experiments. Next, we conducted experiments to verify that circLMO7 could promote the malignant biological functions of GC by glutamine metabolism. Finally, we found that the RNA-binding protein HNRNPL can bind to the flanking introns of circLMO7 exon to promote its cyclization.
As far as the current circRNA research is concerned, although the role of circRNA in tumors has not been fully elucidated, there have been quite a few reports indicating that circRNA can be used as a competitive endogenous RNA to regulate tumors [48–50]. In this research, we confirmed that circLMO7 affected the WNT2/β-Catenin pathway by acting as a miR-30a-3p sponge to promote the development of GC. This is the first report that the ring structure of LMO7 can promote GC. However, this study only detected the expression of circLMO7 in GC tissues. Studies on the presence of circulating circLMO7 in patient blood and its impact on GC development have not been performed. This needs to be further studied in the future. To investigate the potential clinical significance of circLMO7, we investigated the relationship between circLMO7 and patient clinicopathological characteristics. We found that circLMO7 was closely related to the T grade and TNM stage of GC, indicating that circLMO7 can affect the infiltration and malignancy of GC. However, circLMO7 had no significant correlation with lymphatic invasion, which was inconsistent with our results in GC cells. We suspect that the migration and invasion capability were enhanced in GC cells, but this may not be specific to lymph node metastases. Metastases are the result of complicated molecular networks, and circLMO7 may contribute to only part of the process. Further research needs to be conducted to confirm this prediction. In the process of finding the downstream miRNA of circLMO7, we identified 11 potential miRNAs, of which miR-30a-3p had the highest binding efficiency, so we focused our study on this miRNA. We found that miR-30a-3p was downregulated in GC and inhibited the development of GC, which was consistent with other studies on miR-30a-3p [51–53]. However, whether circLMO7 can affect the development of GC through other miRNAs remains to be studied.
Glutamine metabolism is one of the important metabolic pathways in the development of cancer [54, 55]. It has been reported that circRNAs can promote the development of cancer through glutamine metabolism [21, 22], and the WNT2/β-Catenin signaling pathway is related to glutamine metabolism in cancer [35, 36]. Therefore, we confirmed the relationship between circLMO7 and glutamine metabolism in GC. In this study, circLMO7 mainly promoted the development of GC by regulating the activity of GLS to promote the TCA cycle and ROS stress balance. However, in recent years, some studies have reported that glutamine can be used as a nitrogen source to participate in the synthesis of nucleotides (purines and pyrimidines) [56, 57]. Moreover, glutamine is related to mTOR signaling, apoptosis, and autophagy [58–60]. These mechanisms provide new directions for our future research.
Conclusions
Taken together, we have demonstrated that circLMO7 is significantly upregulated in GC tissues and that circLMO7 can act as a miR-30a-3p sponge affecting the WNT2/β-Catenin pathway to promote the proliferation, migration and invasion of GC cells. CircLMO7 can also promote the malignant biological functions of GC by facilitating glutaminolysis. In addition, HNRNPL can promote the self-cyclization of circLMO7. In conclusion, circLMO7 is expected to become a new biomarker for GC and a potential target for treatment (Supplementary Fig. 5).
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- GC
Gastric cancer
- ceRNA
Competitive endogenous RNA
- circRNA
Circular RNA
- miRNA
MicroRNA
- pre-mRNA
Precursor mRNA
- GLS
Glutaminase
- GLN
Glutamine
- GLU
Glutamate
- α-KG
α-ketoglutarate
- GDH
Glutamate dehydrogenase
- GSH
Glutathione
- TCA cycle
Tricarboxylic acid cycle
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- RBP
RNA-binding protein
- HNRNPL
Heterogeneous ribonucleoprotein L
- NGS
Next-generation sequencing
- qRT-PCR
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction
- FISH
RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization
- EdU
5-Ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine
- IHC
Immunohistochemistry
- HE
Hematoxylin-eosin
- IF
Immunofluorescence
- RIP
RNA immunoprecipitation
- gDNA
Genomic DNA
- EMT
Epithelial-mesenchymal transition
Authors’ contributions
Xing Zhang participated in the experimental design and data analysis. Penghui Xu performed some of the experiments. Jiacheng Cao conceived of the project, performed most of the experiments and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81871946); the Primary Research & Development Plan of Jiangsu Province (BE2016786); the Program for Development of Innovative Research Team in the First Affiliated Hospital of NJMU; the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD, JX10231801); Jiangsu Key Medical Discipline (General Surgery)(ZDXKA2016005); Jiangsu Key Lab of Cancer Biomarkers, Prevention and Treatment, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Personalized Medicine, Nanjing Medical University; Youth Fund of Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation (BK20181081); Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82002562).
Availability of data and materials
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
We obtained human GC tissues and adjacent normal tissues from GC patients at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. The ethics committee of Nanjing Medical University approved all of our experiments.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Jiacheng Cao, Xing Zhang and Penghui Xu contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, et al. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2) [published correction appears in lancet. 2015 mar 14;385(9972):946] Lancet. 2015;385(9972):977–1010. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62038-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Pasechnikov V, Chukov S, Fedorov E, Kikuste I, Leja M. Gastric cancer: prevention, screening and early diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(38):13842–13862. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Roy RK, Hoppe MM, Srivastava S, et al. CEACAM6 is upregulated by Helicobacter pylori CagA and is a biomarker for early gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7(34):55290–55301. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Qu S, Yang X, Li X, et al. Circular RNA: a new star of noncoding RNAs. Cancer Lett. 2015;365(2):141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Qu S, Zhong Y, Shang R, et al. The emerging landscape of circular RNA in life processes. RNA Biol. 2017;14(8):992–999. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2016.1220473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pamudurti NR, Bartok O, Jens M, et al. Translation of CircRNAs. Mol Cell. 2017;66(1):9–21. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Salzman J, Gawad C, Wang PL, Lacayo N, Brown PO. Circular RNAs are the predominant transcript isoform from hundreds of human genes in diverse cell types. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ashwal-Fluss R, Meyer M, Pamudurti NR, et al. circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing. Mol Cell. 2014;56(1):55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Shang Q, Yang Z, Jia R, Ge S. The novel roles of circRNAs in human cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0934-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jeck WR, Sorrentino JA, Wang K, et al. Circular RNAs are abundant, conserved, and associated with ALU repeats [published correction appears in RNA. 2013 mar;19(3):426] RNA. 2013;19(2):141–157. doi: 10.1261/rna.035667.112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hansen TB, Jensen TI, Clausen BH, et al. Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges. Nature. 2013;495(7441):384–388. doi: 10.1038/nature11993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yang R, Xing L, Zheng X, Sun Y, Wang X, Chen J. The circRNA circAGFG1 acts as a sponge of miR-195-5p to promote triple-negative breast cancer progression through regulating CCNE1 expression. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0933-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 14.Zheng F, Wang M, Li Y, et al. CircNR3C1 inhibits proliferation of bladder cancer cells by sponging miR-27a-3p and downregulating cyclin D1 expression. Cancer Lett. 2019;460:139–151. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fang J, Hong H, Xue X, et al. A novel circular RNA, circFAT1(e2), inhibits gastric cancer progression by targeting miR-548g in the cytoplasm and interacting with YBX1 in the nucleus. Cancer Lett. 2019;442:222–232. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.10.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wang S, Zhang X, Li Z, et al. Circular RNA profile identifies circOSBPL10 as an oncogenic factor and prognostic marker in gastric cancer. Oncogene. 2019;38(44):6985–7001. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0933-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Conn SJ, Pillman KA, Toubia J, et al. The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs. Cell. 2015;160(6):1125–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Salmena L, Poliseno L, Tay Y, Kats L, Pandolfi PP. A ceRNA hypothesis: the Rosetta stone of a hidden RNA language? Cell. 2011;146(3):353–358. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wesselhoeft RA, Kowalski PS, Anderson DG. Engineering circular RNA for potent and stable translation in eukaryotic cells. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2629. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05096-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yang L, Venneti S, Nagrath D. Glutaminolysis: a Hallmark of Cancer metabolism. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2017;19:163–194. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071516-044546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Cai J, Chen Z, Wang J, et al. circHECTD1 facilitates glutaminolysis to promote gastric cancer progression by targeting miR-1256 and activating β-catenin/c-Myc signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(8):576. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1814-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhen N, Gu S, Ma J, et al. CircHMGCS1 Promotes Hepatoblastoma Cell Proliferation by Regulating the IGF Signaling Pathway and Glutaminolysis. Theranostics. 2019;9(3):900–919. doi: 10.7150/thno.29515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jin L, Alesi GN, Kang S. Glutaminolysis as a target for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2016;35(28):3619–3625. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gorrini C, Harris IS, Mak TW. Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12(12):931–947. doi: 10.1038/nrd4002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Harris IS, Treloar AE, Inoue S, et al. Glutathione and thioredoxin antioxidant pathways synergize to drive cancer initiation and progression [published correction appears in Cancer cell. 2015 Feb 9;27(2):314] Cancer Cell. 2015;27(2):211–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bleijs M, van de Wetering M, Clevers H, Drost J. Xenograft and organoid model systems in cancer research. EMBO J. 2019;38(15):e101654. doi: 10.15252/embj.2019101654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Drost J, Clevers H. Organoids in cancer research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(7):407–418. doi: 10.1038/s41568-018-0007-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Xu H, Lyu X, Yi M, Zhao W, Song Y, Wu K. Organoid technology and applications in cancer research. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0662-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yilmaz M, Christofori G. EMT, the cytoskeleton, and cancer cell invasion. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2009;28(1–2):15–33. doi: 10.1007/s10555-008-9169-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Yeung KT, Yang J. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tumor metastasis. Mol Oncol. 2017;11(1):28–39. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Huang R, Zong X. Aberrant cancer metabolism in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer metastasis: mechanisms in cancer progression. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017;115:13–22. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang Z, Wang J, Dong X. Wnt2 contributes to the progression of gastric cancer by promoting cell migration and invasion. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(3):2857–2864. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Katoh M. Frequent up-regulation of WNT2 in primary gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. Int J Oncol. 2001;19(5):1003–1007. doi: 10.3892/ijo.19.5.1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Katoh M. WNT2 and human gastrointestinal cancer (review) Int J Mol Med. 2003;12(5):811–816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Li B, Cao Y, Meng G, et al. Targeting glutaminase 1 attenuates stemness properties in hepatocellular carcinoma by increasing reactive oxygen species and suppressing Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. EBioMedicine. 2019;39:239–254. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.11.063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang J, Mao S, Guo Y, Wu Y, Yao X, Huang Y. Inhibition of GLS suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis in prostate cancer. Biosci Rep. 2019;39(6):BSR20181826. doi: 10.1042/BSR20181826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ebbesen KK, Kjems J, Hansen TB. Circular RNAs: identification, biogenesis and function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1859(1):163–168. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2015.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Li X, Yang L, Chen LL. The biogenesis, functions, and challenges of circular RNAs. Mol Cell. 2018;71(3):428–442. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Fei T, Chen Y, Xiao T, et al. Genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies HNRNPL as a prostate cancer dependency regulating RNA splicing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(26):E5207–E5215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617467114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Zhang X, Wang S, Wang H, et al. Circular RNA circNRIP1 acts as a microRNA-149-5p sponge to promote gastric cancer progression via the AKT1/mTOR pathway. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0935-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zheng X, Huang M, Xing L, et al. The circRNA circSEPT9 mediated by E2F1 and EIF4A3 facilitates the carcinogenesis and development of triple-negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01183-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Unterleuthner D, Neuhold P, Schwarz K, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblast-derived WNT2 increases tumor angiogenesis in colon cancer [published online ahead of print, 2019 Oct 30]. Angiogenesis. 2019. 10.1007/s10456-019-09688-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 43.Zhou Y, Huang Y, Cao X, et al. WNT2 Promotes Cervical Carcinoma Metastasis and Induction of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):e0160414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jiang H, Li Q, He C, et al. Activation of the Wnt pathway through Wnt2 promotes metastasis in pancreatic cancer. Am J Cancer Res. 2014;4(5):537–544. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cheng XX, Wang ZC, Chen XY, et al. Correlation of Wnt-2 expression and beta-catenin intracellular accumulation in Chinese gastric cancers: relevance with tumour dissemination. Cancer Lett. 2005;223(2):339–347. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2004.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Molaei F, Forghanifard MM, Fahim Y, Abbaszadegan MR. Molecular Signaling in Tumorigenesis of Gastric Cancer. Iran Biomed J. 2018;22(4):217–230. doi: 10.22034/ibj.22.4.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Oliveira LA, Oshima CTF, Soffner PA, et al. The canonical wnt pathway in gastric carcinoma. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2019;32(1):e1414. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sang Y, Chen B, Song X, et al. circRNA_0025202 regulates Tamoxifen sensitivity and tumor progression via regulating the miR-182-5p/FOXO3a Axis in breast Cancer. Mol Ther. 2019;27(9):1638–1652. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.05.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Huang X, Li Z, Zhang Q, et al. Circular RNA AKT3 upregulates PIK3R1 to enhance cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer via miR-198 suppression. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-0969-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Li Q, Pan X, Zhu D, Deng Z, Jiang R, Wang X. Circular RNA MAT2B promotes glycolysis and malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma through the miR-338-3p/PKM2 Axis under hypoxic stress. Hepatology. 2019;70(4):1298–1316. doi: 10.1002/hep.30671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang Y, Wang F, He J, et al. miR-30a-3p Targets MAD2L1 and Regulates Proliferation of Gastric Cancer Cells. Onco Targets Ther. 2019;12:11313–11324. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S222854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Liu X, Ji Q, Zhang C, et al. miR-30a acts as a tumor suppressor by double-targeting COX-2 and BCL9 in H. pylori gastric cancer models. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):7113. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07193-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Li D, Yang M, Liao A, et al. Linc00483 as ceRNA regulates proliferation and apoptosis through activating MAPKs in gastric cancer [published online ahead of print, 2018 may 15] J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(8):3875–3886. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Altman BJ, Stine ZE, Dang CV. From Krebs to clinic: glutamine metabolism to cancer therapy [published correction appears in Nat Rev Cancer. 2016 Dec;16(12 ):773] Nat Rev Cancer. 2016;16(10):619–634. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lee N, Kim D. Cancer Metabolism: Fueling More than Just Growth. Mol Cells. 2016;39(12):847–854. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2016.0310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wise DR, Thompson CB. Glutamine addiction: a new therapeutic target in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2010;35(8):427–433. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Young VR, Ajami AM. Glutamine: the emperor or his clothes? J Nutr. 2001;131(9 Suppl):2449S–2447S. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.9.2449S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Durán RV, Oppliger W, Robitaille AM, et al. Glutaminolysis activates rag-mTORC1 signaling. Mol Cell. 2012;47(3):349–358. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Qing G, Li B, Vu A, et al. ATF4 regulates MYC-mediated neuroblastoma cell death upon glutamine deprivation. Cancer Cell. 2012;22(5):631–644. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.09.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Eng CH, Yu K, Lucas J, White E, Abraham RT. Ammonia derived from glutaminolysis is a diffusible regulator of autophagy. Sci Signal. 2010;3(119):ra31. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2000911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.