Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 5;26(1):189–211. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09711-6

Table 5.

Heterogeneity analysis – socioeconomic characteristics

DEP VAR = (1) (2) (3) (4)
InterFlow IntraFlow InterFlow IntraFlow
Panel A
More convenient area Less convenient area
Treat*Post −0.111*** −0.109*** −0.098* −0.090***
(0.025) (0.034) (0.057) (0.024)
Control Variables Yes Yes Yes Yes
Daily FE Yes Yes Yes Yes
City FE Yes Yes Yes Yes
Observations 17,280 17,280 17,160 17,160
R2 0.867 0.734 0.883 0.748
Panel B
More developed area Less developed area
Treat*Post −0.118*** −0.098*** −0.073 0.001
(0.029) (0.030) (0.054) (0.017)
Control Variables Yes Yes Yes Yes
Daily FE Yes Yes Yes Yes
City FE Yes Yes Yes Yes
Observations 17,520 17,520 17,400 17,400
R2 0.876 0.765 0.871 0.776
Panel C
More intensive population Less intensive population
Treat*Post −0.121*** −0.145*** −0.104** −0.029
(0.028) (0.036) (0.051) (0.018)
Control Variables Yes Yes Yes Yes
Daily FE Yes Yes Yes Yes
City FE Yes Yes Yes Yes
Observations 17,760 17,760 17,760 17,760
R2 0.875 0.762 0.872 0.731

The regression specification follows columns (3) and (4) of Table 3. Panel A splits the sample according to the highway passenger capacity. Panel B splits the sample according to income level. Panel C splits the sample according to the density of the population. Robust standard errors are clustered by city in parentheses. *, **, and *** respectively denote significance levels of 10%, 5% and 1%