Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 5;51(4):589–599. doi: 10.1007/s11125-020-09530-w

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the sample and associations with PHQ-4 scores

Total sample PHQ4 Group differences
n % M SD P value Effect sizea
Gender Female 286 63.8 1.9 0.7 .002 d = 0.31
Male 162 36.2 1.7 0.6
Age group 18–24 252 45.7 1.8 0.6 n.s.
25–34 236 42.8 1.9 0.7
35–44 46 8.3 1.7 0.7
45–54 18 3.3 1.5 0.4
Nationality Swiss 489 88.9 1.8 0.6 n.s.
Non-Swiss 61 11.1 2.0 0.8
Migration background No 484 89.7 1.8 0.6 .015 d = 0.25
Yes 54 10.1 2.1 0.8
Discipline Social Work 225 40.4 n.s.
Engineering & Architecture 190 34.1
Information Technology 3 .5
Art & Design 104 18.7
Music 11 2.0
Business 24 4.3
Relationship status Spouse/partner, living in the household 148 29.9 1.9 0.8 n.s.
Spouse/partner living outside the household 125 25.3 1.8 0.6
No spouse/partner 169 34.1 1.8 0.6
Another form of relationship 53 10.7 1.8 0.6
Number of children No children 486 92.2 n.s.
1 child 24 4.6
2 children 11 2.1
3 children 6 1.1
Household type Single-person household 53 10.0 1.9 0.7 .032 η2 = .027
Couple with no children 113 21.3 1.9 0.8
Couple with child(ren) 56 10.5 1.5 0.5
Single-parent household with child(ren) 70 13.2 1.8 0.7
Non-family household with several people (e.g., shared house) 161 30.3 1.8 0.6
Other 78 14.7 1.7 0.7

aEffect sizes defined as follows: “small, d = .2, η2  = .02”, “medium, d = .5, η2  =  .13”, “large, d = .8, η2  = .26”