Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 21;14(12):e0008927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008927

Table 4. Antigen and Mf positives in randomly versus purposively selected PSUs by age group.

Randomly selected PSUs Purposively selected PSUs
Age group* 5–9 years ≥10 years All ages ≥5 years 5–9 years ≥10 years All ages ≥5 years
Valid FTS results 1668 1665 3333 255 264 519
Ag-positive, n (%) 24 (1.4%) 67 (4.0%) 91 4 (1.6%) 27 (10.2%) 31
Adjusted Ag prevalence (%, 95% CI) 1.3% (0.8–2.1%) 4.7% (3.1–7.0%) 4.0% (2.8–5.6%) 2.1% (1.0–4.3%) 11.4% (7.9–16.1%) 10.0% (7.4–13.4%)
Mf slides# available 24 66 90 4 27 31
Mf positive, n (% of slides) 1 (4.2%) 12 (18.2%) 13 0 (0%) 5 (18.5%) 5
Mf prevalence % of valid FTS (N or 95% CI)* 0.1% (1668) 0.7% (1664)^ 0.6% (0.3–1.0%) 0.0% (255) 1.9% (264) 1.7% (0.7–4.1%)

* All results adjusted for sampling design; results for age 5–9 years and ≥10 years standardized for gender; results for all ages ≥5 years standardized for both age and gender.

# Mf slides were only prepared for positive FTS samples.

^ Denominator for overall prevalence is the sum of those who were FTS negative (assumed Mf negative, no slide done) and those who were FTS positive with slide available. Thus, the one FTS positive person with no slide available was excluded from analyses.