Table 4. Comparison of H1 and H2 diameters of the glenoid cavity in studies by various authors.
Authors | H1, mm | H2, mm | ||||
Male | Female | Right side | Left side | Right side | Left side | |
Churchill et al. [2] | 27.86 ± 1.6 | 23.6 ± 1.5 | - | - | - | - |
Frutos [12] | 26.3 ± 1.5 | 22.31 ± 1.4 | - | - | - | - |
Ozer et al. [13] | 27.33 ± 2.4 | 22.72 ± 1.72 | - | - | - | - |
Patel et al. [14] | 23.89 ± 2.29 | 22.22 ± 2.73 | - | - | - | - |
Akhtar et al. [4] | 23.67 ± 2.53 | 23.59 ± 2.47 | 16.30 ± 2.16 | 16 ± 2.34 | ||
Mamatha et al. [6] | 23..35 ± 2.04 | 23.05 ± 2.30 | 16.27 ± 2.01 | 15.77 ± 1.96 | ||
Rajput et al. [7] | 23.3 ± 3.0 | 22.92 ± 2.80 | 15.10 ± 2.54 | 13.83 ± 2.45 | ||
Sarwar et al. [9] | 23.95 ± 2.78 | 23.64 ± 2.37 | 16.16 ± 2.38 | 15.34 ± 2.17 | ||
El-Din and Ali [10] | 21.33 ± 2.49 | 21.69 ± 2.06 | 28.31 ± 2.38 | 27.99 ± 2.55 | ||
Kavita et al. [15] | 25.07 ± 2.7 | 24.9 ± 2.0 | 16.8 ± 1.8 | 16.3 ± 2.0 | ||
Present study | 24.1 ± 3.2 | 23.1 ± 2.9 | 15.4 ± 2.0 | 15.3 ± 2.2 |