Table 4:
Characteristic/Behavior | Total1 (n=180) | Impact on Child (n=92) | Gain-Framing (n=63) | Financial Impact (n=25) | P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow-up | 0.57 | ||||
Completed | 107 (59%) | 52 (57%) | 39 (62%) | 16 (64%) | |
Partially Completed | 7 (4%) | 4 (4%) | 1 (2%) | 2 (8%) | |
Incomplete | 66 (37%) | 36 (39%) | 23 (37%) | 7 (28%) | |
Quit attempt | 0.61 | ||||
Yes | 86 (75%) | 44 (79%) | 28 (70%) | 14 (78%) | |
No | 28 (25%) | 12 (21%) | 12 (30%) | 4 (22%) | |
Used Medications | |||||
Yes | 37 (33%) | 17 (30%) | 12 (31%) | 8 (44%) | 0.51 |
No | 76 (67%) | 39 (70%) | 27 (69%) | 10 (55%) | |
Medication Types | 0.69 | ||||
None | 76 (67%) | 39 (70%) | 27 (69%) | 10 (56%) | |
Gum and patch | 16 (14%) | 9 (16%) | 5 (13%) | 2 (11%) | |
Gum only | 11 (10%) | 5 (9%) | 3 (8%) | 3 (17%) | |
Patch only | 7 (6%) | 2 (4%) | 3 (8%) | 2 (11%) | |
Chantix | 2 (2%) | 1 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6%) | |
Unknown | 1 (1%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3%) | 0 (0%) | |
Quitline Use | 0.96 | ||||
Yes | 8 (7%) | 4 (7%) | 3 (8%) | 1 (6%) | |
No | 105 (93%) | 52 (93%) | 36 (92%) | 17(94%) | |
Quality Access | 0.25 | ||||
Highest-quality care | 100 (93%) | 47 (89%) | 37 (95%) | 16(100%) | |
Lower-quality care | 8 (7%) | 6(11%) | 2 (5%) | 0 (0%) | |
Quality Family Centeredness | 0.72 | ||||
Highest-quality care | 103 (93%) | 49 (91%) | 37 (95%) | 17 (94%) | |
Lower-quality care | 8 (7%) | 5 (9%) | 2 (5%) | 1 (6%) | |
Quality Timeliness | 0.79 | ||||
Highest-quality care | 73 (70%) | 36 (69%) | 28 (74%) | 9 (64%) | |
Lower-quality care | 31 (30%) | 16 (31%) | 10 (26%) | 5 (36%) | |
Social Support Score2 | 0.99 | ||||
84 (61–97) | 83 (63–97) | 88 (59–95) | 83 (58–100) |
Total n=180; completed follow-up n=107; partially completed follow-up n=7
The Social Support Score provides an overall functional social support index, on a scale from 0–100. A higher score indicates more support, presented as median (interquartile range) within group.