Table 3:

Simulator Outcomes at 3-month Follow-up

		Rate ratio	95% CI	p-value
Controlling for sex
Cell phone engagement
	sex (M vs F)	1.38	0.95, 2.01	0.10
	HE-D vs LCO-D	1.24	0.74, 2.08	0.42
	HE-ND vs LCO-D	1.23	0.75, 2.02	0.41
	LCO-ND vs LCO-D	1.32	0.79, 2.23	0.29
Use of peer passenger to manage distractions
	sex (M vs F)	0.50	0.19, 1.32	0.16
	HE-D vs LCO-D	0.84	0.33, 2.15	0.71
	HE-ND vs LCO-D	0.26	0.06, 1.09	0.07
	LCO-ND vs LCO-D	0.58	0.21, 1.65	0.31
EOFR ≥2 seconds
	sex (M vs F)	1.26	0.59, 2.66	0.55
	HE-D vs LCO-D	1.58	0.60, 4.12	0.35
	HE-ND vs LCO-D	1.15	0.43, 3.11	0.78
	LCO-ND vs LCO-D	0.88	0.29, 2.69	0.82
Controlling for sex and Baseline Assessment of Distractions*
Cell phone engagement
	sex (M vs F)	1.49	1.05, 2.13	0.03
	HE-D vs LCO-D	1.14	0.81, 1.60	0.45
Use of peer passenger to manage distractions
	sex (M vs F)	0.40	0.15, 1.04	0.06
	HE-D vs LCO-D	0.50	0.20, 1.24	0.14
EOFR ≥2 seconds
	sex (M vs F)	0.80	0.30, 2.17	0.66
	HE-D vs LCO-D	1.11	0.43, 2.84	0.83

Note:

^*These models only included two groups: LCO-D and HE-D