Table 5.

Segmentation results compared with other methods on the LiTS test dataset.

		LiTS liver							LiTS tumor
	Dimension	DC	DG	Jaccard	VOE	RVD	ASSD	MSD	DC	DG	Jaccard	VOE	RVD	ASSD	MSD
Kaluva et al. (2018)	2D	0.912	0.923	0.850	0.150	−0.008	6.465	45.928	0.492	0.625	0.589	0.411	19.705	1.441	7.515
Bi et al. (2017)	2D	0.959	–	0.922	–	–	–	–	0.500	–	0.388	–	–	–	–
Li et al. (2018)	2.5D	0.961	0.965	–	0.074	−0.018	1.450	27.118	0.722	0.824	–	0.366	4.272	1.102	6.228
MEDDIIR	Unknown	0.950	0.955	–	0.094	0.047	1.597	28.911	0.658	0.819	–	0.380	−0.129	1.113	6.323
Yuan (2017)	2D	0.963	0.967	–	0.071	−0.010	1.104	23.847	0.657	0.820	–	0.378	0.288	1.151	6.269
Summer	Unknown	0.941	0.945	–	0.108	−0.066	6.552	152.350	0.631	0.786	–	0.400	−0.181	1.184	6.367
Proposed method	3D	0.961	0.963	0.926	0.074	0.002	1.214	26.948	0.595	0.795	0.611	0.389	−0.152	1.289	6.775