Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 8;47:100894. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2020.100894

Table 5.

Altered amygdala rs-fc within hypothesized regions of the prefrontal cortex.

Model and regressor Seed Center of gravity AAL label BA Comm Surface area (mm2) Mean Z x y z
Lateral prefrontal cortex
General: Adversity L L superior frontal gyrus (anterior lPFC)* FP 29.3 −3.39 −24 54 9
L middle frontal gyrus (anterior lPFC) Def 48.9 −3.40 −23 54 14
R L superior frontal gyrus (anterior lPFC)* FP 83.4 −3.49 −24 60 8
Dimensional: Neglect L L middle frontal gyrus (dorsolateral PFC) DA 28 −3.73 −43 35 21
Orbitofrontal cortex
Dimensional: Abuse L R orbital part of middle gyrus 11 None 31.4 3.73 29 41 −10

Note. *: Cluster is not present when controlling for income as a covariate. L: left, R: right; x, y, and z coordinates correspond to the cluster’s center of gravity; BA: Brodmann area, if any, associated with the displayed coordinates; Comm: Gordon communities associated with the cluster, if any; Mean Z: average Z-score associated with the regressor across the spatial extent of the cluster. Key for Gordon communities: DA = Dorsal attention, Def = Default mode, FP = Frontoparietal. Cluster reporting is hierarchically organized by hypothesized region, model and regressor, and seed. Reporting is comprehensive for each hypothesized region; i.e., no effects of abuse are reported within the lateral prefrontal cortex because there were no clusters within that region associated with that regressor.