Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 9.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Transl Med. 2020 Dec 9;12(573):eabc5926. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc5926

Fig. 3. Functional Sensorimotor Connectivity.

Fig. 3.

(A) Sensorimotor functional connectivity of the BA 3a, 3b, 4a, and 4p regions within the ankle ROI is represented by averaged Pearson’s correlation coefficients. (B) ROI-to-ROI functional connectivity across all groups. (C) Table of ROI-to-ROI functional connectivities of significance (pFDR < 0.05, two-tailed). Post hoc ANOVA analyses presented in the table demonstrate the relative strength of each relationship between groups. Significant comparisons are highlighted in orange. (D) Anatomical seed-based cross-ROI correlation to phantom sensation score during task. (E,F) The two highest positively (P < 0.002, P < 0.0009) correlated relationships (OP4/BA6d2 PreCG and BA3b/Cereb ventral dentate) are plotted to demonstrate the distribution of data on a per-individual basis (AA, green, n = 10 and TA, orange, n = 5). (G) Network seed-based cross-ROI correlation to phantom sensation score during resting state. (H) The strongest negatively correlated relationship (P < 0.011) from resting state (visual.occipital/sensorimotor.superior) is plotted to demonstrate the distribution of data on a per-individual basis (AA, green, n = 10 and TA, orange, n = 5).