Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 23;7:603653. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.603653

Table 1.

Associations between intake of added sugar and risk of incident stroke, coronary events, atrial fibrillation and aortic stenosis.

Added sugar intake categories
<5 E% 5–7.5 E% 7.5–10 E% 10–15 E% 15–20 E% >20 E%
(n = 2,354) (n = 5,027) (n = 6,709) (n = 8,735) (n = 2,377) (n = 675) P-trend
Stroke
 Cases/person-years 220/45,382 459/99,027 665/132,501 896/16,9957 251/45,522 89/12,129
Basic model 1 0.84 (0.71–0.99) 0.84 (0.72–0.98) 0.85 (0.73–0.98) 0.88 (0.73–1.06) 1.28 (1.00–1.64) 0.62
Main model 1 0.87 (0.74–1.03) 0.88 (0.76–1.04) 0.87 (0.75–1.02) 0.89 (0.73–1.08) 1.16 (0.89–1.51) 0.39
Basic modela 1.19 (1.02–1.39) 1.00 (0.89–1.12) 1 1.00 (0.91–1.11) 1.05 (0.91–1.21) 1.52 (1.22–1.90)
Main modela 1.13 (0.97–1.33) 0.99 (0.87–1.11) 1 0.99 (0.89–1.10) 1.00 (0.86–1.17) 1.31 (1.03–1.66)
Coronary events
 Cases/person-years 216/45,758 526/98,903 712/132,271 1,000/169,782 271/45,356 115/12,192
Basic model 1 1.01 (0.86–1.19) 0.96 (0.82–1.11) 1.01 (0.87–1.17) 1.01 (0.84–1.21) 1.73 (1.37–2.17) 0.02
Main model 1 1.02 (0.87–1.20) 0.99 (0.84–1.15) 1.00 (0.86–1.17) 0.92 (0.76–1.11) 1.39 (1.09–1.78) 0.47
Atrial fibrillation
 Cases/person-years 365/44,955 795/97,087 1,140/129,803 1,434/167,028 403/44,768 104/12,168
Basic model 1 0.88 (0.78–1.00) 0.87 (0.77–0.98) 0.81 (0.72–0.91) 0.85 (0.74–0.99) 0.89 (0.71–1.10) 0.09
Main model 1 0.90 (0.80–1.03) 0.90 (0.80–1.02) 0.85 (0.75–0.96) 0.90 (0.78–1.05) 0.91 (0.72–1.15) 0.40
Aortic stenosis
 Cases/person-years 59/46,590 126/101,045 161/135,715 250/173,9587 53/46,720 20/12,632
Basic model 1 0.85 (0.63–1.16) 0.74 (0.55–1.00) 0.86 (0.65–1.15) 0.68 (0.47–0.99) 1.05 (0.63–1.75) 0.46
Main model 1 0.86 (0.63–1.17) 0.76 (0.56–1.03) 0.89 (0.66–1.20) 0.69 (0.47–1.02) 0.97 (0.57–1.66) 0.84
a

Analysis of added sugar was carried out twice using different reference categories for stroke (<5 and 7.5–10 E%) due to the U-shaped trend. E%, Energy percentage.

The associations were determined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model and are expressed as hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval and P-value for the linear trend. The basic model was adjusted for age, sex, season of dietary assessment, diet method, and energy intake. The main model was adjusted for age, sex, season of dietary assessment, diet method, energy intake, smoking status, educational level, leisure-time physical activity, alcohol consumption, BMI, and dietary habits including intake of processed meat, coffee, saturated fatty acids, and fiber density.