Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 10;31(2):1240–1258. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhaa291

Table 2.

Prefrontal–hippocampal activity patterns and coupling induced by activating CA1

CON GHPE GE F values
Activating HP by pulses stimulation
4–12 Hz 0.234 ± 0.049 0.059 ± 0.042 *P = 0.016 0.023 ± 0.047 **P = 0.005 F(2,45) = 6.47 P = 0.0034
PFC Power (During-pre)/pre 12–30 Hz 0.210 ± 0.049 0.045 ± 0.032 **P = 0.0096 −0.007 ± 0.039 **P = 0.0011 F(2,45) = 8.21 P = 0.0009
30–45 Hz 0.184 ± 0.035 0.051 ± 0.027 **P = 0.007 0.004 ± 0.030 ***P = 0.0004 F(2,45) = 9.38 P = 0.0004
Activating HP by ramp stimulation
4–12 Hz 0.186 ± 0.045 0.070 ± 0.031 *P = 0.011 0.026 ± 0.050 *P = 0.024 F(2,45) = 3.98 P = 0.026
HP Power (During-pre)/pre 12–30 Hz 0.267 ± 0.051 0.091 ± 0.043 *P = 0.018 0.046 ± 0.043 **P = 0.004 F(2,45) = 6.62 P = 0.003
30–45 Hz 0.224 ± 0.054 0.102 ± 0.046 0.089 ± 0.049 F(2,45) = 2.34 P = 0.108
Spike-triggered LFP 15–40 Hz 3.08 ± 0.59 1.43 ± 0.27 *P = 0.018 1.42 ± 0.40 *P = 0.021 F(2,43) = 5.26 P = 0.009
PFC2/3 Firing interval 0.020 ± 0.001 0.015 ± 0.002 *P = 0.04 0.014 ± 0.002 **P = 0.005 F(2,39) = 6.37 P = 0.004
HP spike-triggered LFP 15–40 Hz 7.06 ± 2.19 3.03 ± 0.72 *P = 0.044 2.90 ± 0.88 *P = 0.042 F(2,45) = 3.22 P = 0.049
PFC-HP Coherence 12–18 Hz 0.220 ± 0.044 0.041 ± 0.023 ***P = 0.0003 −0.004 ± 0.024 ***P = 0.00001 F(2,41) = 15.33 P = 0.000001

Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA test followed by Bonferroni-corrected post hoc test and the listed P values correspond to comparisons between CON and GHPE mice, CON and GE mice. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.