Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 6;16(1):e0244753. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244753

Table 4. Overall analytical sensitivity and specificity and agreement analysis of LAMP assay in comparison with real-time PCR assay (N = 333).

Real-time PCR MTB LAMP positive NTM LAMP positive LAMP negative Total
Comparison MTB 72 0 0 72 (21.6%)
NTM 121 2 123 (36.9%)
Negative 138 138 (41.4%)
Total 72 (21.6%) 121 (36.3%) 140 (42.0%)
Comparison for pulmonary specimens (N = 264) MTB 59 0 0 59 (22.3%)
NTM 118 2 120 (45.5%)
Negative 85 85 (32.2%)
Total 59 (22.3%) 118 (44.7%) 87 (33.0%)
Overall strength comparing with real-time PCR for pulmonary specimens (N = 264) Analytical sensitivity 98.88% (96.02–99.86)
Analytical specificity 100% (95.75–100)
NPV 97.70% (91.46–99.41)
PPV 100% (NA)
Overall strength comparing with real-time PCR (N = 333) Analytical sensitivity 98.97% (96.34–99.88)
Analytical specificity 100% (97.36–100)
NPV 98.57% (94.56–99.64)
PPV 100% (NA)
Agreement analysis* Weighted Kappa (95% CI) 0.9925 (0.9821–1.0000)
Standard error 0.0053
Indicators Overall (95% CI)

*Kappa agreement analysis applied.

Abbreviations: LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay; MTB, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; NTM, Non-tuberculosis Mycobacterium; CI, confidence interval, NPV, negative predictive value, PPV, positive predictive value.