Table 1.
Comparison of Commonly Used Techniques in the Detection of Pathogenic Virus
| Technique | Principle | Time | Advantages | Disadvantages | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCR | nucleic acid | hours | •well-established | •ease of contamination | 16,17 |
| •small number of samples | •time consuming | ||||
| ELISA | viral protein | hours | •highly specific | •low sensitivity | 18 |
| •high-quality sample preparation | |||||
| Cell culturing | infectivity assay | days to weeks | •suitable for virus subtyping recovery of novel and divergent strains | •contamination problems | 19 |
| •inexpensive | •time consuming and labor intensive | ||||
| •unavailable for immediate patient care | |||||
| Electron microscopy | viral particles | hours | •rapid method | •well-trained personnel | 20 |
| •low specificity | |||||
| Computed tomography (CT) | chest scanning | hours | •good basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment | •technical expertise | 21 |
| •centralized facilities |