Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 25;32(1):179–186. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04497-w

Table 2.

Re-procedures and re-visits for stress urinary incontinence after mid-urethral operation

Cases (94) Controls (330) OR (95% CI) P
SUI re-procedure, n (%) 3 (3.2) 17 (5.2) 0.6 (0.2–2.1) 0.6
 RP-MUS 1 (33.3) 9 (52.9)
 TO-MUS 0 4 (23.5)
 Bulking injection 2 (66.7) 3 (17.6)
 Other vaginal operation 0 1 (5.9)
Re-procedures between index MUS and subsequent delivery included 6 (6.2) 17 (5.0) 1.2 (0.5–3.3) 0.6
Time to re-operation, median in years (IQR) 4.4 (2.7-NA) 4.6 (2.3–7.6) 0.5
SUI or MUI re-visit, n (%) 23 (24.5) 86 (26.1) 0.9 (0.5–1.6) 1.0
Re-visits between index MUS and subsequent delivery 15 (65.2)
Re-visit incontinence type
 SUI 14 (60.9) 57 (66.3)
 MUI 9 (39.1) 29 (33.7)
Time to re-visit, median in years (IQR) 2.6 (0.0–6.0) 0.7 (0.0–3.0) 0.04

SUI = stress urinary incontinence, MUI = mixed urinary incontinence, RP-MUS = retropubic mid-urethral sling, TO-MUS = transobturator mid-urethral sling, MUS = mid-urethral sling