Table 2.
Risk of bias assessment of included SRs according to AMSTAR risk of bias assessment tool
| Systematic review (first author, year) | AMSTAR domains | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Total score (quality) | |
| Wang et al. (2015) [49] | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | Y | Y | N | 7 (medium quality) |
| Tuminelli et al. (2017) [44] | N | Y | N | N | N | Y | N | N | NA | NA | N | 2 (low quality) |
| Molinero-Mourel et al. (2016) [47] | N | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N | N | N | N | N | 3 (low quality) |
| Goiato et al. (2014) [46] | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | 5 (medium quality) |
| Chrcanovic et al. (2013) [45] | Y | Y | N | Y | N | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | 5 (medium quality) |
| Chrcanovic et al. (2013) [15] | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | N | N | Y | N | N | 6 (medium quality) |
| Aboul-Hosn Centenero et al. (2018) [48] | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | 9 (high quality) |
Y yes (one point), N no (0 point), NA not applicable (0 point), CA can’t answer (0 point)