Table 1.
Genotype | Fertility rate (%)a | Panicle numberb | Culm lengthb | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
‘2017 | ‘2018 | ‘2019 | |||
WT (Taichung 65) | 93.5 ± 1.5c | 88.5 ± 0.4 cd | 93.0 ± 1.3c | 17.4 ± 1.0cd | 81.2 ± 1.0c |
WT (Kinmaze) | 96.0 ± 0.2c | 90.5 ± 1.3c | 87.8 ± 0.7 cd | 18.6 ± 1.1cd | 57.8 ± 0.9e |
be1 (EM557) | 85.1 ± 2.3c | 71.7 ± 0.9d | 79.0 ± 0.6d | 16.2 ± 1.2d | 82.5 ± 1.4c |
be2b (EM10) | 89.0 ± 2.4c | 80.0 ± 4.9 cd | 87.9 ± 1.6 cd | 22.0 ± 0.9c | 67.8 ± 1.2d |
be1 e2b (#1403) | 96.1 ± 0.3c | 90.1 ± 2.0 cd | 86.1 ± 2.6 cd | 19.9 ± 0.7cd | 71.4 ± 1.7d |
Data represent mean ± standard error (n = 3a, n = 10b)
Different lowercase letters (c-e) indicate significant differences among rice genotypes (P < 0.05; Tukey-Kramer method)