Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 2;70(1):67–75. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319631

Table 2.

Diagnoses of the target lesions and observation times in each group

Outcome WLI group
(n=2258)
2G-NBI group
(n=2265)
P value
(primary WLI vs
primary 2G-NBI)
Primary WLI Secondary 2G-NBI Primary 2G-NBI Secondary WLI
Patients with EGC, n (%) 44 (1.9) 19 (0.8) 53 (2.3) 17 (0.8) 0.412
Patients with a target lesion, n (%) 308 (13.8) 114 (5.0) 251 (11.2) 124 (5.5)
Target lesion, n 371 118 282 132
 EGC*, n (%) 50 (13.5) 19 (16.1) 59 (20.9) 17 (12.9)
 Others*, n (%)
 Low-grade adenoma 17 (4.6) 7 (5.9) 20 (7.1) 2 (1.6)
 Advanced gastric cancer 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0.4) 0 (0)
 Negative for neoplasia 287 (77.4) 90 (76.3) 195 (69.1) 107 (81.1)
 Indefinite for neoplasia 1 (0.3) 0 (0) 1 (0.4) 1 (0.8)
 Not biopsied 16 (4.3) 2 (1.7) 6 (2.1) 5 (3.8)
Positive predictive value, % 13.5 16.1 20.9 12.9 0.015
Observation time†, seconds 233±92 254±104 <0.001

*The common denominator of this set of values is the number of target lesions.

†Observation time was measured in the patients who completed the primary examination: 2234 in the WLI group and 2238 in the 2G-NBI group. Values are expressed as means±SD. An en dash represents no data collected.

WLI, white light imaging; 2G-NBI, second-generation narrow band imaging; EGC, early gastric cancer.