Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;29(6):403–416. doi: 10.5607/en20047

Table 3.

Various behavioral changes observed in GF animals or by antibiotics-treated gut dysbiosis

Behaviors Changes Animal models Behavioral methods (references)
Basal locomotion ↔ GF Open field test (23, 26, 28, 103)
ABX Open field test (9, 30, 105)
↑ GF Open field test (24, 25*, 27)
Anxiety ↓ GF Open field test (23, 24, 27, 28)
Novelty suppressed feeding test (23)
Light-dark test (6, 24)
Elevated plus maze test (25, 26)
ABX Light-dark test (29)
Elevated plus maze test (30)
↑ GF Open field test (42, 103)
↔ GF Light-dark test (104)
ABX Open field test (9, 105)
Elevated plus maze test (9, 105)
Depression ↓ GF Tail suspension test (6, 8)
Forced swim test (7, 8)
Sucrose preference test (8)
↑ ABX Forced swim test (9, 10)
Tail suspension test (10)
Social interaction ↓ GF 3-chamber social interaction test (25*, 43, 44, 45)
Social interaction test (42)
ABX 3-chamber social interaction test (10**, 30)
↑ GF 3-chamber social interaction test (27)
Cognition ↓ GF Nobel object recognition test (25, 104)
T-maze test (104)
ABX Nobel object recognition test (29, 105, 106)
Morris water maze test (9)
↔ ABX Barnez maze test (105)
Nobel object recognition test (9)

a↔, no changes; ↑, increase; ↓, decrease; GF, germ-free animals; ABX, antibiotics.

b*female only; **normal sociability, but reduced social novelty.