Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 9;22(1):e51352. doi: 10.15252/embr.202051352

Figure 5. Dynamic folding modulation design and structural analysis of FGF21SS variant.

Figure 5

  1. Sequence alignment of FGF21, FGF21SS, and FGF19 in the mutated region. The mutation sites are indicated by boxes. Cysteines for disulfide bond formation are highlighted on a yellow background. The secondary structure of FGF21 is shown on the top. The N‐terminal residue IDs of FGF21SS are indicated under the sequence. # is used to identify the mutated residues (codes are colored blue) and the same residues having different sequence number in FGF21SS from wild type.
  2. 2D 1H‐15N HSQC spectra comparison of FGF21core (black) and FGF21SS/core (red) revealing the elimination of the loop conformation in FGF21SS. Assignments for FGF21core and FGF21SS/core are labeled as in Figs 2B and 5A, respectively.
  3. Temperature denaturation CD experiments indicating the significant increase of thermostability. CD value was recorded and normalized at 222 nm. Tm value of the proteins is fitted using Boltzmann function.
  4. Superimposition of FGF21SS/core (skyblue) and FGF21core (green) structure ensembles (10 energy‐refined structures each) in ribbon representation showing the structure conservation upon SS bond mutation.
  5. Cartoon representation of FGF21SS/core. Cys31#‐Cys43# (between β2 and β3) and Cys75‐Cys93 (between β6 and β9) SS bonds are highlighted and shown as stick representations.