Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 6;4(1):e2031669. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31669

Table 2. Dietary Niacin Intake and the Risk of New-Onset Hypertension Stratified by Quartiles and Combined Quartiles.

Niacin intake, mg/d Participants, No. Events, No. (rate)a Crude model Adjusted modelb
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Quartiles
Q1 (<12.4) 3061 1188 (51.7) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Q2 (12.4 to <14.3) 3060 1166 (46.6) 0.90 (0.83-0.97) .009 0.95 (0.87-1.04) .27
Q3 (14.3 to <16.7) 3061 952 (36.2) 0.70 (0.64-0.76) <.001 0.83 (0.75-0.90) <.001
Q4 (≥16.7) 3061 998 (47.0) 0.92 (0.85-1.00) .05 1.08 (0.99-1.19) .09
Categories
Q1-2 (<14.3) 6121 2354 (49.0) 1.36 (1.26-1.47) <.001 1.18 (1.09-1.28) <.001
Q3 (14.3 to <16.7) 3061 952 (36.2) 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
Q4 (≥16.7) 3061 998 (47.0) 1.32 (1.21-1.44) <.001 1.31 (1.20-1.44) <.001

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; Q, quartile.

SI conversion factor: To convert niacin to μmol/d, multiply by 8.123.

a

Incident rate is presented per 1000 person-years of follow-up.

b

Adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, region, education, and occupation, as well as energy intake and sodium to potassium intake ratio.