Skip to main content
. 2020 May 8;74(1):19–24. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2020-206607

Table 3.

PRGS ranging from 1 to 4 in 13 patients with peritoneal metastasis from pancreatic cancer who underwent at least two PIPAC treatments

Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4* Patient 5 Patient 7* Patient 10* Patient 11 Patient 12
PRGS before PIPAC 1 (highest/mean) 3/2.25 3/2 3/2.25 4/2.75 3/3 1/1 3/2.25 2/1.33 1/1
PRGS before PIPAC 3 (or 2*) (highest/mean) 2/1.75 3/1.75 3/1.5 3/2.25 3/2 1/1 3/2 1/1 1/1
Histological response + + + + + U + + U
Patient 13* Patient 14* Patient 15* Patient 16*
PRGS before PIPAC 1 (highest/mean) 1/1 1/1 3/2 3/3
PRGS before PIPAC 3 (or 2*) (highest/mean) 1/1 1/1 3/2.33 2/2
Histological response U U +

– indicates histological progression (according to mean PRGS); + indicates histological regression (according to mean PRGS).

*Did only undergo PIPAC twice, data from PIPAC 2 instead of PIPAC 3.

PIPAC, Pressurised IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy; PRGS, Peritoneal Regression Grading Score; U, unchanged mean PRGS.