Table 20.

Our proposed model vs existing benchmarks with real-world fake news dataset

Authors	Accuracy(%)
Ghanem et al [13]	48.80
Singh et al [42]	87.00
Ahmed et al [1] using LR-unigram model	89.00
Ruchansky et al [35]	89.20
Ahmed et al [1] using LSVM model	92.00
Liu et al [23]	92.10
O’Brien et al [28]	93.50
Our Proposed model (FakeBERT)	98.90