Table 3.
Chimerism results of the different isolation methods using NGS and ddPCR techniques
| Marker ID | Chromosome | Recipient | Donor | Control gDNA | MagNAPure | IDEAL | LabTurbo24 AB | Chemagic 360 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 15% | 10% | 1% | 10% | 1% | 10% | 1% | 10% | 1% | ||||
| NGS chimerism | |||||||||||||
| 1 | 1 | +/− | −/− | 100 | 14.7 | 16.2** | 0.1* | 0** | 0* | 21.8* | 4.6 | 10.6** | 5.7* |
| 3 | 1 | +/− | +/+ | 100 | 12.8* | 3.6** | 0* | 0** | 8.8* | 12.7* | 2.6 | 0** | 3.3** |
| 8 | 6 | +/− | −/− | 100* | 18.8* | 13.9* | 0 | 0** | 2.3* | 16.2* | 4.9* | 12.8** | 4* |
| 9 | 7 | +/− | +/+ | 100* | 30.2* | 35.8** | 0* | 0** | 2.9* | 12.3* | 1.9 | 0** | 0.7** |
| 11 | 8 | −/− | +/+ | 99.1* | 18.8* | 19.4* | 0* | 0** | 1.5* | 10.4* | 2.3 | 5.7** | 1.2* |
| 12 | 9 | +/+ | −/− | 98.1 | 16.5* | 10.6** | 0* | 0** | 3.9* | 12.7* | 1.2 | 15** | 2.4* |
| 22 | 20 | −/− | +/+ | 98.9 | 17.1 | 7.1** | 0** | 100** | 2.6** | 24* | 1.8 | 0** | 1.4** |
| 23 | 22 | +/− | +/+ | 100* | 16* | 14.8* | 0 | 0** | 0* | 17.5* | 2.8* | 8.1** | 1* |
| Average (%) | 99.5 | 18.1 | 15.2 | 0 | 12.5 | 2.7 | 16 | 2.7 | 6.5 | 2.4 | |||
| SD | 0.7 | 5.3 | 9.8 | 0 | 35.4 | 2.8 | 4.9 | 1.3 | 6.1 | 1.8 | |||
| ddPCR chimerism | |||||||||||||
| Total droplets | 22,512 | 21,496 | 22,286 | 22,685 | 21,481 | 21,253 | 16,812 | 18,665 | 19,207 | 19,115 | |||
| RPP30 positive droplets | 13,184 | 11,256 | 94 | 84 | 40 | 29 | 124 | 128 | 55 | 40 | |||
| Y-marker positive droplets | 7121 | 914 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |||
| % chimerism (Y-marker heterozygous × 2) | 108% | 16% | NC | NC | NC | NC | 6% |
< DL NC |
NC | NC | |||
Quality warning: * (yellow): coverage: 1000–10,000 X, ** (red): coverage < 1000 X
NC not calculated, DL detection limit