Table 3.
Intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis of patients according to the ACR30 response after 12 weeks of treatment and reaching the Wallace inactive disease criteria after treatment for 24 and 48 weeks on the basis of the initial patient allocation into groups
Time-point | Efficacy parameter achieved | Intention-to-treat | Per protocol | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initial combination scheme ETA + MTX | Standard consequent scheme with MTXa | p | Initial combination scheme ETA + MTX | Standard consequent scheme with MTXa | p | ||
12 | ACR30 | 33/35 (94.3%) | 20/33 (60.6%) | 0.001 | 33/34 (97.1%) | 20/32 (62.5%) | 0.001 |
24 | Wallace inactive disease | 11/35 (31.4%) | 11/33 (33.3%) | > 0.999 | 11/33 (33.3%) | 11/30 (36.7%) | 0.798 |
48 | Wallace inactive disease | 17/35 (48.6%) | 20/33 (60.6%) | 0.342 | 17/32 (53.1%) | 19/29 (65.5%) | 0.436 |
48 | Remission | 11/35 (31.4%) | 8/33 (24.2%) | 0.594 | 11/32 (34.4%) | 8/29 (27.6%) | 0.593 |
aAccording to treatment regimen in this group, non-responders were supposed to switch to open-label ETA+MTX combination therapy after 12 or 24 weeks of treatment if they failed to reach the effectiveness parameter corresponding to the given week
P values are based on Pearson’s χ2 test (for categorical data)