Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 24;29(4):281–291. doi: 10.7570/jomes20071

Table 3.

Comparison of surrogate markers of IR and insulin secretion between healthy control subjects and patients with MetS

Variable Control group (n = 75) MetS group (n = 75) P
HOMA-IR 2.67 (1.98–3.53) 4.63 (3.69–6.82) 0.001
HOMA2-IR 1.51 (1.13–1.96) 2.06 (1.77–2.72) 0.001
HOMA-AD 3.85 (1.82–5.24) 8.11 (5.24–9.86) 0.001
HOMA-TG 0.47 (0.33–0.64) 0.81 (0.53–1.01) 0.001
TyG index 7.55 (5.54–8.92) 12.26 (9.95–14.44) 0.001
FIGR 2.05 (1.89–2.30) 2.31 (1.73–2.64) 0.307
FIRI 2.41 (1.78–3.18) 4.17 (3.33–6.14) 0.001
HOMA-1%S 37.40 (28.30–50.56) 21.58 (14.65–27.06) 0.001
HOMA-2%S 66.10 (51–88.7) 49 (37.4–56.7) 0.001
QUICKI 0.33 (0.31–0.34) 0.30 (0.29–0.31) 0.001
Bennet index 1.32 (1.19–1.52) 1.01 (0.86–1.11) 0.001
McAuley index 7.43 ± 2.70 6.01 ± 1.90 0.001
Raynaud index 3.41 (2.68–4.54) 2.68 (2.15–3.10) 0.001
1/Insulin 0.085 (0.067–0.114) 0.066 (0.054–0.078) 0.001
GI ratio 8.76 (7.81–9.53) 7.77 (6.81–10.43) 0.316
FISI 9.23 (6.98–12.48) 5.32 (3.61–6.68) 0.001
SPISE 6.01 (4.65–7.20) 3.53 (2.80–5.11) 0.001
HOMA-1%B 130.82 (108–164.25) 80.57 (65.90–96.01) 0.001
HOMA-2%B 110.20 (97.30–129.10) 73.80 (61.30–87.03) 0.001

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or mean± standard deviation. All the IR indices should be lower to be healthy, and the insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function indices should be higher.

IR, insulin resistance; MetS, metabolic syndrome; HOMA, homeostatic model assessment; AD, adiponectin; TG, triglycerides; TyG, triglyceride-glucose; FIGR, fasting insulin to glucose ratio; FIRI, fasting insulin resistance; %S, insulin sensitivity; QUICKI, quantitative insulin sensitivity check index; 1/Insulin, reciprocal insulin; GI, glucose to insulin; FISI, fasting insulin sensitivity index; SPISE, single-point insulin sensitivity estimator; %B, beta-cell function.