Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 22;127(2):267–280. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa184

Table 2.

Top ten models of transition rates (q) among pollination syndromes, ranked according to their sampling frequency in the RJ MCMC analysis of the combined dataset

Model q  01 q  02 q  03 q  10 q  12 q  13 q  20 q  21 q  23 q  30 q  31 q  32 Proportion Cumulative proportion
1 Z Z 0 Z Z 0 Z 0 Z 1 0 0 0.07 0.07
2 Z Z 0 Z Z 0 Z 0 0 1 0 0 0.06 0.12
3 Z Z 0 Z Z 0 0 0 Z 1 0 0 0.05 0.18
4 Z Z 0 Z Z 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0.04 0.21
5 Z Z 0 0 0 0 Z Z 1 1 1 Z 0.02 0.24
6 Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 Z 0.02 0.26
7 Z Z 0 0 0 0 Z 0 1 1 1 Z 0.02 0.28
8 Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 Z 1 1 1 Z 0.02 0.30
9 Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 Z 0.02 0.32
10 Z Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0.02 0.33

Subscript numbers indicate pollination syndromes (0 = bee, 1 = Lepidoptera + bee, 2 = bird, 3 = autogamy); numbers in sequence indicate shifts from one pollination syndrome to another. Symbols (Z, 0 or 1) in the table represent transition rates. A value of Z indicates a transition rate of 0, whereas values of 0 and 1 represent different positive transition rates. Within models, transitions sharing a symbol occur at the same rate, whereas transitions with different symbols occur at different rates