Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 17;127(2):251–265. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa171

Table 2.

Correlation matrix based on Pearson’s correlation coefficient between major morphophysiological traits and gene expression data under the present experimental set-up

SR EA LGF POR HYD DEN WAX LGF1 SUB1A-1 SUB1C
SR 1
EA –0.759** 1
LGF 0.880** –0.948** 1
POR 0.092 0.276 –0.019 1
HYD 0.622* –0.800** 0.845** -0.041 1
DEN 0.148 –0.285 0.090 –0.881** 0.060 1
WAX 0.859** –0.865** 0.954** 0.044 0.845** 0.010 1
LGF1 0.906** –0.841** 0.916** 0.055 0.649* 0.048 0.894** 1
SUB1A-1 0.900** –0.869** 0.952** 0.110 0.824** 0.050 0.933** 0.930** 1
SUB1C -0.929** 0.875** –0.960** –0.068 –0.808** –0.097 –0.937** –0.935** –0.992** 1

The * and ** denote a significant correlation between two traits at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively, according ro paired t-test.

SR, survival rate; EA, elongation ability; LGF, leaf gas film thickness; POR, tissue porosity; HYD, leaf hydrophobicity; DEN, leaf density; WAX, epicuticular wax content; and LGF1, SUB1A-1 and SUB1C are the relative transcript abundance of LGF1, SUB1A-1 and SUB1C, respectively.