Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 6;10:10. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01560-x

Table 2.

Main findings of 20 articles included in the current study

First author (reference number) Year of publication Country/city Sample size Age range and mean age Duration of MS Design of study Outcome of study Scale/index The method of outcome assessment Prevalence(N of event) Score of quality
Balsamo et al. [9] 2017 Italy 101 41.2 ± 11.6 11.5 ± 7.5 Cross-sectional Erectile dysfunction (ED) International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) score ≤ 25 Self-administered questionnaire In 75 patients (74.25%) 3
Barak et al. [10] 1996 Israel 9 35.4 ± 10.2 4.1 ± 2.7 Cross-sectional Sexual dysfunction (SD) Researcher-made questionnaire Self-administered questionnaire In 5 patients (55.5%) 4
Carnero Contentti et al. [11] 2019 Argentina 65 40.0 ± 8.0 7.09 ± 5.1 Cross-sectional Erectile dysfunction (ED) IIEF-15 scores ≤ 21 Self-administered questionnaire In 49 patients (89%) 3
Çelik et al. [12] 2013 Turkey 45 37.4 ± 8.6 - Cross-sectional Sexual dysfunction (SD) Multiple Sclerosis Intimacy and Sexuality Questionnaire-19 (MSISQ-19) Self-administered questionnaire In 22 patients (49%) 1
Darija et al. [13] 2015 Serbia/Belgrade 27 41.6 ± 6.9 9.2 ± 6.5 Cohort Sexual dysfunction (SD) Szasz sexual functioning scale (Szasz) score > than 0 Face-to-face structured interview 77.8% at baseline to 88.9% at the 6-year follow-up 2
Demirkiran et al. [14] 2006 Turkey 18 37.99 ± 8.9 7.3 ± 5.4 Cross-sectional Sexual dysfunction (SD) MSISQ-19 Structured face-to-face interview In 14 patients (78%) 2
Finkelsztejn et al. [15] 2009 Brazil 17 43.5 ± 11.2 11.5 ± 6.7 Cross-sectional Sexual dysfunction (SD) Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)–(??? not clear) Data collected by the authors during consultation 31.1% 3
Ghezzi et al. [16] 1996 Italy 77 40.8 ± 9.0 9.1 ± 5.8 Cross-sectional Erectile dysfunction (ED) A subjective evaluation of their own sexual life A clinical interview In 26 patients (33.7%) 5
Hennessey et al. [17] 1999 South Glamorgan 68 50.2 - Cross-sectional Sexual dysfunction (SD) Researcher-made questionnaire Postal questionnaire and a physical examination 56 of 68(82%) reported deterioration in sexual activity 3
Lew-Starowicz and Rola [18] 2014 Poland 67 Range : 29–72; mean age: 49.9 15.5 Cross-sectional Erectile dysfunction (ED) IIEF-15 score ≤ 25 Self-administered questionnaire ED was found in 52.9% of patients 3
Marck et al. [19] 2016 International 388 - - Cross-sectional Sexual dysfunction (SD) Multiple Sclerosis Quality Of Life (MSQOL-54) sexual function scale Self-administered questionnaire—online survey 49.7 % 3
Nortvedt et al. [20] 2007 Hordaland County, Western Norway 14 Range: 17–53; mean: 32.9 ± 10 6.1 Cross-sectional Dissatisfaction with their sexual functioning Five of the 18 MS-specific questions constituting the sexual scale of the MSQoL-54 Self-administered questionnaire 50% 3
Orasanu et al. [21] 2013 A global registry 1568 38.47 ± 9.6 13.97 ± 9.3 Cross-sectional Sexual activity and satisfaction (SAS) MSISQ-19 Self-administered questionnaire—online survey 38.6% of males experienced at least 5 different types of severe symptoms 3
Redelman 2009 New South Wales, Australia 50 - - Cross-sectional Sexual difficulties Researcher-made questionnaire with 28 items Self-administered questionnaire 74% 4
Tepavcevic et al. [22] 2008 Serbia/Belgrade 31 32.6 ± 8.5 9.0 ± 5.1 Cohort Sexual dysfunction (SD) Szasz Sexual Functioning Scale Face-to-face structured interview 84% had one or more sexual disturbances 3
Tomé et al.´ [23] 2019 Brazil 41 Range: 22 to 66; mean: 40.7 ± 10.1 10.5 ± 7.3 Cross-sectional Sexual dysfunction (SD) IIEF-15 score ≤ 45 Interview In 29 patients (74.4%) 3
Vazirinejad et al. [24] 2008 Derbyshire/England 38 51 ± 12.6 17 ± 10.8 Cross-sectional Sexual problems (MSQOL-54) Self-administered questionnaire In 29 patients (76%) 2
Winder et al. [25] 2018 Erlangen-Nuremberg 31 38.2 ± 11.2 4 Cross-sectional Erectile dysfunction (ED) 5-item International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire (IIEF5)—≤ 21 Self-administered questionnaire In 14 patients (45.2%) 3
Zavoreo et al. [26] 2016 Croatia 42 35 ± 12 5.0 ± 1.5 Cross-sectional Sexual dysfunction (SD) Sexual Satisfaction scale (SSS) Self-administered questionnaire 71% 3
Zorzon et al. [27] 1999 Italy/Trieste 38 40.8 ± 11.9 9.1 ± 6.4 Case-control Sexual dysfunction (SD) Szasz Sexual Functioning Scale Face-to-face structured interview 92.1% had one or more sexual disturbances 3