Table 2.
Item | Group | Performance | 2-Way ANOVA | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-training | Post-training | Group effect | Training effect | Group × training interaction | ||
Time (min) | Residents | 26.8 ± 4.97 | 17.6 ± 2.51 | F(1, 16) = 11,544 | F(1, 16) = 4,805 | F(1, 16) = 8.12 |
Fellows | 15.4 ± 3.97 | 16.6 ± 4.45 | P = 0.004a | P = 0.044a | P = 0.012a | |
Score | ||||||
Total | Residents | 12.2 ± 2.39 | 17.6 ± 2.19 | F(1, 16) = 15,565 | F(1, 16) = 8,898 | F(1, 16) = 4,898 |
Fellows | 18.6 ± 2.19 | 19.4 ± 2.51 | P = 0.001a | P = 0.009a | P = 0.042a | |
Time | Residents | 1 ± 0 | 2 ± 0.71 | F(1, 16) = 6.4 | F(1, 16) = 1.6 | F(1, 16) = 3.6 |
Fellows | 2.4 ± 0.89 | 2.2 ± 0.84 | P = 0.022a | P = 0.224 | P = 0.076 | |
Leak | Residents | 3.6 ± 1.52 | 3.4 ± 1.14 | F(1, 16) = 0.036 | F(1, 16) = 0.036 | F(1, 16) = 0.321 |
Fellows | 3.2 ± 1.1 | 3.6 ± 0.89 | P = 0.852 | P = 0.852 | P = 0.579 | |
Shape | Residents | 4.2 ± 1.1 | 4.6 ± 0.89 | F(1, 16) = 3.6 | F(1. 16) = 0,4 | F(1. 16) = 0,4 |
Fellows | 5 ± 0 | 5 ± 0 | P = 0.076 | P = 0.536 | P = 0.536 | |
Flow | Residents | 3.4 ± 1.67 | 4.8 ± 0.45 | F(1, 16) = 4 | F(1, 16) = 2.25 | F(1, 16) = 4 |
Fellows | 5 ± 0 | 4.8 ± 0.45 | P = 0.063 | P = 0.153 | P = 0.063 | |
Self-estimation | Residents | 1 ± 0 | 2.8 ± 0.45 | F(1, 16) = 103,143 | F(1, 16) = 48,286 | F(1, 16) = 7,143 |
Fellows | 3.4 ± 0.55 | 4.2 ± 0.45 | P = 0.000a | P = 0.000a | P = 0.017a | |
Penalty points | Residents | − 1 ± 1 | 0 ± 0 | F(1, 16) = 0.095 | F(1, 16) = 2,381 | F(1, 16) = 2,381 |
Fellows | − 0.4 ± 0.55 | − 0.4 ± 0.89 | P = 0.762 | P = 0.142 | P = 0.142 | |
Total score excluding self-estimation Self sstimation |
Residents | 11.2 ± 2.39 | 14.8 ± 2.17 | F(1, 16) = 5.29 | F(1, 16) = 3,541 | F(1, 16) = 3,541 |
Fellows | 15.2 ± 1.79 | 15.2 ± 2.17 | P = 0.035a | P = 0.078 | P = 0.078 |
Number of subjects: fellows = 5, residents = 5
ANOVA analysis of variance
aStatistically significant, P < 0.05