Table 3.
Statistical and analysis the result of antimicrobial susceptibility to 20 antibiotics for 38 S. dysentery
| Antimicrobial | Antimicrobial resistance rate No. (%) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total (n = 38) | Beef farm(n = 20) | Dairy farm(n = 18) | |||||||
| Zhangye(n = 14) | Baiyin(n = 3) | Linxia(n = 3) | Jinchang(n = 10) | Lanzhou(n = 5) | Wuwei(n = 3) | ||||
| Fluoroquinolone | Norfloxacin | NOR | 15(39.47%) | 12(85.71%) | 3(100%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Enrofloxacin | ENR | 26(68.42%) | 13(92.86%) | 0 | 0 | 10(100%) | 0 | 3(100%) | |
| Levofloxacin | LEV | 25(65.79%) | 12(85.71%) | 0 | 0 | 10(100%) | 0 | 3(100%) | |
| Ciprofloxacin | CIP | 25(65.79%) | 12(85.71%) | 0 | 0 | 10(100%) | 0 | 3(100%) | |
| Ofloxacin | OFX | 15(39.47%) | 12(85.71%) | 3(100%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| β-lactam | Ampicillin | AMP | 35(92.11%) | 14(100%) | 3(100%) | 0 | 10(100%) | 5(100%) | 3(100%) |
| Amoxycillin/Clavulanic acid | AMC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cephazolin | KZ | 33(86.84%) | 14(100%) | 3(100%) | 0 | 9(90%) | 5(100%) | 2(66.67%) | |
| Cefoxitin | FOX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Ceftriaxone | CRO | 32(84.21%) | 14(100%) | 0 | 0 | 10(100%) | 5(100%) | 3(100%) | |
| Cefotaxime | CTX | 32(84.21%) | 14(100%) | 0 | 0 | 10(100%) | 5(100%) | 3(100%) | |
| Cefepime | FEP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Meropenem | MEM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Imipenem | IPM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Macrolides | Erythromycin | E | 36(94.74%) | 12(85.71%) | 3(100%) | 3(100%) | 10(100%) | 5(100%) | 3(100%) |
| Chloramphenicol | Chloramphenicol | C | 15(39.47%) | 12(85.71%) | 3(100%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tetracyclines | Tetracycline | TE | 31(81.58%) | 12(85.71%) | 3(100%) | 3(100%) | 10(100%) | 0 | 3(100%) |
| Aminoglycosides | Streptomycin | S | 15(39.47%) | 12(85.71%) | 3(100%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gentamicin | CN | 31(81.58%) | 12(85.71%) | 3(100%) | 3(100%) | 10(100%) | 0 | 3(100%) | |
| Amikacin | AK | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |