Table 2.
Characteristics | N (%) |
---|---|
Whether referred to its own methodology as micro-costing | |
Yes | 97 (49.7%) |
No | 98 (50.3%) |
Separate reporting of quantity and unit cost data | |
Yes | 27 (13.8%) |
No | 168 (86.2%) |
Classification of transparency of cost estimates [8] | |
All components of costs were described and data for both quantity and unit cost of resources were reported for each component | 27 (13.8%) |
All components of costs were described and data for costs in each component were reported | 157 (80.5%) |
All components of costs were described but data for costs in each component were not reported | 9 (4.6%) |
Only scope of costing was described but components of costs were not Described | 2 (1.0%) |
Cost components includeda | |
Personnel | 186 (95.4%) |
Materials/supplies/consumables | 172 (88.2%) |
Overhead | 133 (68.2%) |
Equipment/device | 118 (60.5%) |
Facility | 112 (57.4%) |
Medication | 95 (48.7%) |
Transportation | 74 (37.9%) |
Laboratory/diagnostic/imaging test | 68 (34.9%) |
Productivity loss | 37 (19.0%) |
Food | 28 (14.4%) |
Furniture | 22 (11.3%) |
Child/elderly care | 2 (1.0%) |
Other | 60 (30.8%) |
Method of quantity data collectiona | |
Provider/staff interview | 71 (36.4%) |
Hospital administrative cost/accounting database | 57 (29.2%) |
Time-motion study | 42 (21.5%) |
Medical chart/record review | 30 (15.4%) |
Patient self-report | 25 (12.8%) |
Synthesis of literature | 6 (3.1%) |
Clinical guideline | 3 (1.5%) |
Other | 112 (57.4%) |
Not clear | 32 (16.4%) |
Method of unit cost data collectiona | |
Invoice price | 62 (31.8%) |
Hospital administrative cost/accounting database | 60 (30.8%) |
National/regional/provincial/hospital/insurer fee schedule | 47 (24.1%) |
Hospital/clinic/provider price catalogue | 8 (4.1%) |
Human resources/payroll record | 7 (3.6%) |
Other | 126 (64.6%) |
Not clear | 37 (19.0%) |
Percentages may not add to 100 due to rounding
a A study may fall into more than one of the listed categories