Table 3. Output from a comparison of identified Eq 5 models using Anova.
The PA6RMS model was found to be the best fit.
| Goodness-of-Fit indices | DP x NJI ~ PA2RMS +(1│Participants) | DP x NJI ~ PA3RMS +(1│Participants) | DP x NJI ~ PA4RMS +(1│Participants) | DP x NJI ~ PA5RMS +(1│Participants) | DP x NJI ~ PA6RMS +(1│Participants) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degrees of freedom | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| AIC | 207.2 | 207.9 | 207.1 | 206.7 | 205.0 |
| BIC | 213.8 | 214.5 | 213.7 | 213.4 | 211.6 |
| Log-likelihood | -99.6 | -99.9 | -99.5 | -99.4 | -98.5 |
| Deviance | 199.2 | 199.9 | 199.1 | 198.7 | 197.0 |
| Chi-square (p-value) | - | 0.00 (p = 1.00) | 0.8 (p<0.0001) | 0.4 (p<0.0001) | 1.8 (p<0.0001) |