Table 3. Simple and multiple ordered logistic regression analyses: Odds of sugar sweetened beverage consumption by Brazilian adolescents included in the ERICA study.
Brazil, 2013–2014.
Variables | Sugar Sweetened Beverages Consumption Tertile | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
OR1 (CI 95%)a | OR2 (CI 95%)a,b | |||
2nd tertile (8–450 mL) | 3rd tertile (451–3.000 mL) | 2nd tertile (8–450 mL) | 3rd tertile (451–3.000 mL) | |
Food Purchase in the School Cafeteria | ||||
Non/Irregular | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Regular | 1.26 (1.12–1.41)*** | 1.12 (1.01–1.24)* | 1.19 (1.05–1.35)** | 1.13 (1.02–1.26)* |
Pattern 1 | ||||
Tertile 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Tertile 2 | 0.91 (0.82–1.01) | 0.98 (0.89–1.08) | 1.02 (0.91–1.13) | 1.04 (0.93–1.17) |
Tertile 3 | 0.83 (0.76–0.91)*** | 0.91 (0.82–1.01) | 0.89 (0.79–0.99)* | 0.87 (0.77–0.99)* |
Pattern 2 | ||||
Tertile 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Tertile 2 | 1.39 (1.27–1.53)*** | 1.41 (1.26–1.57)*** | 1.24 (1.10–1.40)*** | 1.32 (1.17–1.48)*** |
Tertile 3 | 1.87 (1.67–2.09)*** | 1.93 (1.73–2.15)*** | 1.70 (1.47–1.97)*** | 1.86 (1.63–2.11)*** |
Pattern 3 | ||||
Tertile 1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Tertile 2 | 1.32 (1.19–1.47)*** | 1.27 (1.12–1.44)*** | 1.20 (1.07–1.33)** | 1.14 (1.01–1.28)* |
Tertile 3 | 1.43 (1.29–1.59)*** | 1.50 (1.35–1.65)*** | 1.24 (1.09–1.41)** | 1.24 (1.11–1.40)*** |
OR: Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval; mL: milliliters
1Simple ordered logistic regression model
2Multiple ordered logistic regression model
a1st tertile (0–7.2 mL) as a reference
bAdjusted for the variables gender, race/ethnicity, age, socioeconomic score, and school type
*p<0.05
**p<0.01
***p<0.001