Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 30;2020:8897628. doi: 10.1155/2020/8897628

Table 9.

Spearman correlation coefficients and p values for each item by the adherence type.

Item Rho for overall adherence
(p value)
(number of participants: 101)
Rho for appointment adherence
(p value)
(number of participants: 92)
Rho for lifestyle advice adherence
(p value)
(number of participants: 87)
Rho for remedy adherence
(p value)
(number of participants: 49)
Patients feeling cared for “Showing care and compassion” 0.237 (0.017) 0.251 (0.016) 0.164 (0.129) 0.258 (0.074)

Patients feeling comfortable 0.108 (0.281) 0.154 (0.143) 0.102 (0.347) 0.199 (0.171)
“Making you feel at ease”

Opening patients up about themselves 0.346 (<0.001) 0.296 (0.004) 0.275 (0.010) 0.462 (0.001)
“I am comfortable talking to my therapist about my health problem”

Setting up a relaxing environment 0.018 (0.857) −0.060 (0.569) −0.050 (0.646) 0.237 (0.101)
“The clinic has a relaxing atmosphere”

Providing warmth physically and emotionally 0.108 (0.281) 0.154 (0.143) 0.102 (0.347) 0.199 (0.171)
“Making you feel at ease”

Welcoming 0.108 (0.281) 0.154 (0.143) 0.102 (0.347) 0.199 (0.171)
“Making you feel at ease”

Patients feeling valued as individuals 0.174 (0.082) 0.211 (0.043) 0.164 (0.130) 0.294 (0.040)
“Being interested in you as a whole person”

Assessing and treating holistically 0.174 (0.082) 0.211 (0.043) 0.164 (0.130) 0.294 (0.040)
“Being interested in you as a whole person”

Tailoring treatment 0.274 (0.006) 0.268 (0.010) 0.309 (0.004) 0.389 (0.006)
“My therapist tailors my treatment to be most suitable for me”

Checking treatment 0.364 (<0.001) 0.352 (0.001) 0.285 (0.007) 0.388 (0.006)
“My therapist checks my treatment to make sure it is safe and effective”

Patients feeling understood 0.191 (0.056) 0.214 (0.040) 0.225 (0.037) 0.203 (0.161)
“Fully understanding your concerns”

Communicating well 0.053 (0.598) 0.153 (0.146) 0.070 (0.519) 0.091 (0.533)
(i) Listening
“Really listening”

Empathising 0.251 (0.011) 0.198 (0.059) 0.251 (0.019) 0.279 (0.052)
CARE Measure summary score

Empathising 0.326 (0.001) 0.230 (0.028) 0.268 (0.012) 0.243 (0.092)
(i) Taking concerns seriously
“My therapist is interested when I talk about my health problem”

Empathising 0.332 (0.001) 0.280 (0.007) 0.400 (<0.001) 0.161 (0.269)
(i) Touching appropriately
“My therapist shies away from physical contact”

Patients feeling known 0.174 (0.082) 0.211 (0.043) 0.164 (0.130) 0.294 (0.040)
“Being interested in you as a whole person”

Presenting in a manner suited to the patient 1038.000 (0.138) (number of participants in each group: 43 versus 58) 998.000 (0.704) (number of participants in each group: 40 versus 52) 695.000 (0.038) (number of participants in each group: 37 versus 50) 313.500 (0.672) (number of participants in each group: 21 versus 28)
(i) Funny
“My therapist is funny” (Mann–Whitney U (p value))

Presenting in a manner suited to the patient 286.500 (0.117) (number of participants in each group: 92 versus 9) 261.000 (0.232) (number of participants in each group: 84 versus 8) 161.500 (0.017) (number of participants in each group: 79 versus 8) 69.000 (0.469) (number of participants in each group: 45 versus 4)
(i) Confident
“My therapist is confident” (Mann–Whitney U (p value))

Presenting in a manner suited to the patient 102.000 (0.113) (number of participants in each group: 97 versus 4) 101.000 (0.159) (number of participants in each group: 88 versus 4) 86.500 (0.109 (number of participants in each group: 83 versus 4) 44.500 (0.900) (number of participants in each group: 47 versus 2)
(i) Calm
“My therapist is calm” (Mann–Whitney U (p value))

Presenting in a manner suited to the patient 0.403 (<0.001) 0.291 (0.005) 0.321 (0.002) 0.372 (0.009)
(i) Enthusiastic
“Being positive”

Patients feeling supported in the management of their health 0.357 (<0.001) 0.352 (0.001) 0.299 (0.005) 0.437 (0.002)
“My therapist wants to help me with my health problem”
Example: making a plan of action (not part of the model) 0.332 (0.001) 0.226 (0.031) 0.283 (0.008) 0.226 (0.118)
“Making a plan of action with you”

Reassuring 0.232 (0.020) 0.232 (0.026) 0.215 (0.045) 0.285 (0.047)
“My therapist reassures me”

Educating
(i) Explaining in a way that makes sense to the patient (3 items) 0.144 (0.149) 0.050 (0.634) 0.126 (0.247) 0.381 (0.007)
“Explaining things clearly” 0.426 (<0.001) 0.422 (<0.001) 0.367 (<0.001) 0.386 (0.006)
“When my therapist talks about my health problem, it does not make sense to me” (reverse item) 0.462 (<0.001) 0.393 (<0.001) 0.420 (<0.001) 0.352 (0.013)
“My therapist provides explanations of my treatment that make sense to me” 0.093 (0.354) −0.001 (0.990) 0.168 (0.119) −0.009 (0.951)

Educating
(i) Giving a lot of multilevel advice, self-help, or homework
“My therapist offers advice beyond the immediate health problem”

Helping as much as possible 0.357 (<0.001) 0.352 (0.001) 0.299 (0.005) 0.437 (0.002)
“My therapist wants to help me with my health problem”

Helping as much as possible 0.340 (<0.001) 0.351 (0.001) 0.337 (0.001) 0.369 (0.009)
(i) Knowing limits
“My therapist has, at times, overstepped what I think are his or her limits”

Helping as much as possible 0.071 (0.478) 0.182 (0.082) 0.049 (0.650) 0.157 (0.282)
(i) Giving time
“Letting you tell your “story”

Helping as much as possible 1009.000 (0.785) (number of participants in each group: 26 versus 75) 832.500 (0.686) (number of participants in each group: 23 versus 69) 681.000 (0.454) (number of participants in each group: 24 versus 63) 195.500 (0.694) (number of participants in each group: 9 versus 40)
(i) Adopting role required, for example, technician (not part of the model)
“My therapist is a technician”(Mann–Whitney U (pvalue))

Helping as much as possible 913.500 (0.011) (number of participants in each group: 52 versus 49) 875.500 (0.102) (number of participants in each group: 47 versus 45) 580.500 (0.002) (number of participants in each group: 49 versus 38) 239.000 (0.310) (number of participants in each group: 30 versus 19)
(i) Adopting the role required, for example, a wise healer (not part of the model)
“My therapist is a wise healer” (Mann–Whitney U (p value))

Helping as much as possible 853.500 (0.013) (number of participants in each group: 38 versus 63) 853.000 (0.115) (number of participants in each group: 38 versus 54) 687.000 (0.050) (number of participants in each group: 34 versus 53) 259.000 (0.378) (number of participants in each group: 24 versus 25)
(i) Adopting the role required, for example, like a friend
“My therapist is like a friend”(Mann–Whitney U (p value))

Helping as much as possible 32.500 (0.015) (number of participants in each group: 98 versus 3) 30.500 (0.017) (number of participants in each group: 89 versus 3) 66.500 (0.176) (number of participants in each group: 84 versus 3) 9.000 (0.408) (number of participants in each group: 48 versus 1)
(i) Adopting the role required, for example, a professional (not part of the model)
“My therapist is a professional” (Mann–Whitney U (p value))

Imparting responsibility for health 0.255 (0.010) 0.156 (0.137) 0.219 (0.041) 0.319 (0.025)
“Helping you to take control”

Patients trusting in their practitioner 0.353 (<0.001) 0.329 (0.001) 0.275 (0.010) 0.469 (0.001)
“I trust my therapist”

Example trait: well qualified (not part of the model) 0.341 (<0.001) 0.324 (0.002) 0.218 (0.042) 0.479 (<0.001)
“I have confidence that my therapist is well qualified to treat me”

Example trait: competent (not part of the model) 0.372 (<0.001) 0.346 (0.001) 0.255 (0.017) 0.436 (0.002)
“My therapist is a competent provider of my treatment”

Example trait: expert (not part of the model) 0.314 (0.001) 0.272 (0.009) 0.185 (0.087) 0.265 (0.066)
“My therapist is an expert in my treatment”

Example trait: knows how to treat the patient's health problem (not part of the model) 0.333 (0.001) 0.286 (0.006) 0.264 (0.014) 0.237 (0.101)
“My therapist knows how to treat my health problem”

Example trait: strong reputation 0.121 (0.229) 0.113 (0.284) 0.183 (0.090) 0.124 (0.397)
“My therapist has a strong reputation”

Example trait: a good person 283.000 (0.107) (number of participants in each group: 92 versus 9) 239.000 (0.322) (number of participants in each group: 85 versus 7) 243.000 (0.543) (number of participants in each group: 80 versus 7) 89.500 (0.510) (number of participants in each group: 44 versus 5)
“My therapist is a good person” (Mann–Whitney U (p value))

Example trait: of the same culture as the patient 852.500 (0.007) (number of participants in each group: 41 versus 60) 707.500 (0.005) (number of participants in each group: 37 versus 55) 672.500 (0.031) (number of participants in each group: 35 versus 52) 274.000 (0.964) (number of participants in each group: 17 versus 32)
“My therapist is of the same culture” (Mann–Whitney U (p value))

Example trait: of the same gender as the patient 1209.000 (0.831) (number of participants in each group: 59 versus 42) 933.000 (0.361) (number of participants in each group: 53 versus 39) 775.000 (0.160) (number of participants in each group: 49 versus 38) 369.000 (0.132) (number of participants in each group: 26 versus 23)
“My therapist is of the same gender”(Mann–Whitney U (p value))

Patients having a therapeutic relationship with their practitioner 0.309 (0.002) 0.216 (0.039) 0.226 (0.036) 0.377 (0.008)
“I have a good relationship with my therapist”

Sharing the same views and values on health 0.282 (0.004) 0.260 (0.012) 0.333 (0.002) 0.232 (0.109)
“My therapist shares the same values as me“

Perception of therapist 0.483 (<0.001) 0.434 (<0.001) 0.401 (<0.001) 0.371 (0.009)
Summary score (not part of the model)

indicates a statistically significant association at p < 0.01.