Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 24;7(12):e17341. doi: 10.2196/17341

Table 7.

Multiple mediator model showing total, direct, and indirect effects of affective responsiveness on internet addiction.

Paths Path effect

B (SE) 95% CI
Direct path

(A1)AfResa→DEPb 0.29 (0.09) 0.10 to 0.48

(A2)AfRes→ANXc 0.15 (0.09) −0.04 to 0.34

(A3)AfRes→AvPd 0.32 (0.09) 0.13 to 0.50

(B1) DEP→IATe 1.86 (1.23) −0.59 to 4.32

(B2) ANX→IAT 0.60 (1.16) −1.69 to 2.91

(B3) AvP→IAT 1.84 (1.29) −0.73 to 4.42

(C’)AfRes→IAT 1.65 (0.95) −0.23 to 3.55
Indirect path (A*B)f

Total 1.24 (0.53) 0.28 to 2.38

AfRes→DEP→IAT 0.55 (0.42) −0.17 to 1.48

AfRes→ANX→IAT 0.09 (0.26) −0.33 to 0.76

AfRes→AvP→IAT 0.59 (0.47) −0.27 to 1.60
Total (C=A*B+C’)g

AfRes→IAT 2.90 (0.94) 1.01 to 4.78

aAfRes: affective responsiveness.

bDEP: depression.

cANX: anxiety.

dAvP: avoidant personality.

eIAT: internet addiction test.

fBootstrapped SE values and CI values.

gProportion mediated by specific indirect effect of AfRes→DEP→IAT is 0.24%, AfRes→ANX→IAT is 0.05%, and AfRes→AvP→IAT is 0.26%.