Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 8.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2020 Oct 22;128(1):76–88. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317839

Figure 4. β-adrenergic regulation of GGG and 9* Ca2+ channels in cardiomyocytes.

Figure 4.

(A, C, E) Current-voltage relationships before and after 10 μM forskolin in the presence of 300 nM nisoldipine. Representative of pseudo-wild-type α1C: n=20, GGG mutant: n= 22 and 9* n=22 cardiomyocytes. Insets: Exemplar whole-cell CaV1.2 currents recorded from freshly dissociated cardiomyocytes of pseudo-wild-type, GGG and 9* α1C transgenic mice. Pulses from −70 mV to +10 mV before (black traces) and 3 minutes after (red traces) 10 μM forskolin in presence of nisoldipine. (B, D, F) Graphs of conductance density-voltage relationship for nisoldipine-resistant Ca2+ channels recorded from pseudo-wild-type α1C, GGG-α1C, and 9*-α1C before (black trace) and after (red trace) forskolin. Mean ± SEM. P<1.0 ×10−4 by repeated measures ANOVA; Sidak’s multiple comparison test P-values are in panels. (G) Fold-change in Gmax. Shown are means ± SEM; P<1.0 ×10−4 by Kruskal-Wallis test; Dunn’s multiple comparison test P-values in panel. (H) Boltzmann function parameter, V50. Shown are means + SEM; Paired two-tailed t-test. (I) Ratio of Ca2+ current after forskolin treatment to Ca2+ current before treatment of cardiomyocytes with forskolin for pseudo-wild-type, 9* and GGG-α1C cardiomyocytes. Mean ± SEM. Pseudo-wild-type n=20, GGG mutant: n= 22 and 9* n=22 cardiomyocytes from at least 3 mice for each group. P<1.0 ×10−4 by Kruskal-Wallis test; Dunn’s multiple comparison test P-values in panel for pseudo-WT vs. GGG. * P<1.0 ×10-4.