Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 6.
Published in final edited form as: Neuron. 2020 Oct 23;109(1):177–188.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2020.09.039

Figure 3. Differences in pre-target population spiking are not associated with differences in response times.

Figure 3.

(A) While we observed significantly greater high frequency band (HFB) activity—a proxy for population spiking—during the cue-target delay when response fields (i.e., the LFP equivalent of receptive fields) overlapped the cued location (red lines) relative to when response fields overlapped the non-cued location (blue lines), (B) we observed no differences between trials that resulted in either faster (orange lines) or slower (black lines) response times (RTs). That is, we observed significant attention-related increases in HFB activity but no differences associated with behavioral performance (fast-RT versus slow-RT trials). The shaded area around each line represents the standard error of the mean. See also Figure S1.